ATZ

ATZ is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

ATZ has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Allen & Gledhill LLP	1 case	Loo Ming Nee Bernice Bernice Loo Khoo Seok Leng Sarah-Anne Sarah Ann Khoo

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of ATZ's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of ATZ's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	103,375.00	34,458.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sgca-41 11 Jul 2016	11 Jul 2016	Respondent	PartialThe court upheld the orders regarding maintenance and care and control but reversed the order regarding the division of matrimonial assets.
2	2015-sghc-182 13 Jul 2015	13 Jul 2015	Plaintiff	WonPlaintiff to receive a monthly sum of $3,375 as maintenance for the child, with $1,500 for the child’s maintenance and $1,875 being half share of the current rent of $3,750. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2015-sghc-161 23 Jun 2015	23 Jun 2015	Plaintiff	PartialThe Deed of Separation was upheld, but the court varied the terms to award the plaintiff $100,000 for her indirect contributions to the marriage and welfare of the child, deducting previous payments. The court also made orders for child maintenance and custody, granting joint custody to both parents, care and control to the plaintiff, and liberal access to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.