Bebe bte Mohammad

Bebe bte Mohammad is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Bebe bte Mohammad has been represented by 2 law firms and 2 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Pereira & Tan LLC	1 case	Tee Lee Lian George Pereira
Pereira and Tan	1 case	George Pereira

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bebe bte Mohammad's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bebe bte Mohammad's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2006-sgca-30 24 Sep 2006	24 Sep 2006	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed. The court found no wilful blindness akin to fraud on the part of UOB’s solicitors, no fraud, omission or mistake by UOB in obtaining the registration of the Mortgage under s 160(1) of the Land Titles Act, and that the respondent had no personal equity on the facts to set aside the Mortgage arising from the use of the original Certificate of Title to register the Mortgage.
2	2005-sghc-113 29 Jun 2005	29 Jun 2005	Defendant	WonMortgage dated 3 November 2000 registered by the plaintiff against the property belonging to the defendant comprised in Certificate of Title Volume 495 Folio 160 is null and void and is set aside as against the defendant.