BNP Paribas Wealth Management

BNP Paribas Wealth Management is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 20.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

BNP Paribas Wealth Management has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	2 cases	Luo Qinghui K. Muralidharan Pillai Andrea Tan
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Luo Qinghui K. Muralidharan Pillai Sim Wei Na Ng Chun Ying

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of BNP Paribas Wealth Management's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (20.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20.0%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20.0%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	60.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of BNP Paribas Wealth Management's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Neutral	1(20.0%)	20.0%
Won	3(60.0%)	60.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
JPY	29,062,179.35	29,062,179.351 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghci-2 16 Feb 2017	16 Feb 2017	Plaintiff	NeutralBNP Paribas SA substituted as plaintiff.
2	2016-sghci-5 27 Oct 2016	27 Oct 2016	Plaintiff	WonApplication granted; the defendants' application for a stay of proceedings was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2012-sghc-28 06 Feb 2012	06 Feb 2012	Defendant	WonJudgment in favor of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2010-sghc-264 31 Aug 2010	31 Aug 2010	Defendant	LostThe court granted the plaintiff's prayer for an account of all sums due from the defendant bank to the plaintiff in respect of Account 1 and Account 2.
5	2009-sghc-117 14 May 2009	14 May 2009	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonJudgment for the plaintiff for JPY 29,062,179.35, contractual compound interest and costs of SD 4,000 and disbursements.