Bonnet Esculier Servane Michele Thais

Bonnet Esculier Servane Michele Thais is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Bonnet Esculier Servane Michele Thais has been represented by 4 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Colin Liew LLC	3 cases	Colin Liew
Duxton Hill Chambers (Singapore Practice Group)	1 case	Colin Liew
Essex Court Chambers Duxton (Singapore Practice Group)	1 case	Colin Liew
Legal Clinic LLC	5 cases	Kam Su Cheun Aurill Lim Rui Hsien Esther Valerie Thio Shu Jun

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bonnet Esculier Servane Michele Thais's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 5 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	54.0 parties avg	4.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bonnet Esculier Servane Michele Thais's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,093,065.60	364,355.203 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sgcai-2 01 Mar 2023	01 Mar 2023	Respondent, Defendant	WonAppeal upheld; respondents awarded costs of $150,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2022-sghci-13 28 Aug 2022	28 Aug 2022	Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim	WonDefendants awarded costs and disbursements in the sum of S$1,093,065.60. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2022-sghci-10 14 Jul 2022	14 Jul 2022	Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim	WonJudgment for Defendant; awarded damages under cross-undertaking (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2021-sgcai-5 18 Oct 2021	18 Oct 2021	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed; the CPO and CLPA claims did not fall within the ambit of the Court’s interpleader jurisdiction, and there was no basis to permit the joinder of LG Ltd. Similarly, the consequential relief sought in the form of adding the IRDA claim to the pleadings fell away given the failure of the substantive appeal. Therefore, OS 16 was also dismissed.
5	2020-sghci-22 29 Oct 2020	29 Oct 2020	Defendant	WonThe claim for unjust enrichment in paragraph 39 of the Statement of Claim and the consequential prayer for relief were struck out.