Chiang Dong Pheng
Chiang Dong Pheng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Chiang Dong Pheng has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
UniLegal LLC | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Chiang Dong Pheng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.0
- Complex Cases
- 2 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 16.0 parties avg |
Partial | 24.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2017 | 12.0 parties avg |
2016 | 16.0 parties avg |
2015 | 24.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Chiang Dong Pheng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(25.0%) |
Neutral | 1(25.0%) |
Partial | 2(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2017 | 1 1 |
2016 | 1 1 |
2015 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
04 Jan 2017 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay interest at 5.33% per annum on the sum of $219,816.43 from 3 January 2015 to the date he either set-off or paid the Appellant the sums due to her. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 May 2016 | Defendant | PartialOrdered to pay 10% of the plaintiff's costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
21 Apr 2015 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific outcome mentioned for this party. |
09 Apr 2015 | Defendant | PartialThe defendant's counterclaim was largely dismissed, except that the plaintiff is ordered to refrain from interfering with the issue of grant of probate to the defendant in respect of the Estate and to forthwith remove all caveats in respect of the Estate. |