Cosco-Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd

Cosco-Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm.

Legal Representation

Cosco-Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Ang & Partners	1 case	Goh Kok Leong Chan Leng Sun Daniel Goh Anna Quah Yu Siew Fun

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cosco-Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	66.7%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cosco-Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Neutral	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2001-sghc-223 14 Aug 2001	14 Aug 2001	Third Party	LostOrdered to indemnify the Defendants against damages and costs payable to the Plaintiffs, and to pay the costs of the Defendants' defense against the Plaintiffs' claim on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2001-sghc-224 14 Aug 2001	14 Aug 2001	Defendant	NeutralNo outcome information provided in the text.
3	2000-sgca-24 07 May 2000	07 May 2000	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; the respondents were not duly served with the writ at their registered office, and the service was not proper and valid in accordance with Singapore law. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.