Daewoo Singapore Pte Ltd
Daewoo Singapore Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms.
Legal Representation
Daewoo Singapore Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Tan Cheng Yew & Partners | 3 cases |
Tan JinHwee, Eunice & Lim ChooEng | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Daewoo Singapore Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.2
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 52.2 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2003 | 12.0 parties avg |
2001 | 32.0 parties avg |
2000 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Daewoo Singapore Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 5(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.003 cases |
USD | 7,014,104.511 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2003 | 1 1 |
2001 | 1 3 |
2000 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 5 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
30 Mar 2003 | Plaintiff | LostPlaintiff's action was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
19 Aug 2001 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Security deposit released to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
19 Aug 2001 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. The security deposit together with the interest, if any, will be released to the respondents or their solicitors to account of costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
13 Apr 2001 | Respondent | LostDaewoo's objection to the scheme of arrangement was dismissed, and the scheme was approved. |
04 Jun 2000 | Defendant | LostClaim dismissed against the defendant; required to pay US$7,014,104.51 (assumed USD, as the loan was denominated in US dollars). |