Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd

Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Infinitus Law Corporation	2 cases	Leo Cheng Suan Teh Ee-Von

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%
Partial	26.5 parties avg	6.5	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2013	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Fu Loong Lithographer Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2016-sghc-3 10 Jan 2016	10 Jan 2016	Defendant	LostThe Defendant’s counterclaims concerning double rent, New Tokyo, Doka, Chin Ping and LV Automation were dismissed.
2	2014-sgca-30 22 May 2014	22 May 2014	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part; rulings on Motions 8 and 9 invalidated; rejection of Contested Votes on Motion 2 invalidated; direction on amendments to Motions 1(b) and 1(e) set aside. Costs awarded to the Appellants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2013-sghc-226 27 Oct 2013	27 Oct 2013	Plaintiff	PartialApplication to invalidate the 1st Defendant’s ruling on Motions 1(b) and 1(e) was granted, subject to the proviso that any future amendments should not touch on the legal representatives already appointed by the 2nd Defendant to defend itself in S 311/2012.