Hainan Hui Bang Construction Investment Group Ltd

Hainan Hui Bang Construction Investment Group Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Hainan Hui Bang Construction Investment Group Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Premier Law LLC	2 cases	Toh Yunyuan Selina Lin Yuankai Boey Swee Siang Suchitra Suresh Kumar

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hainan Hui Bang Construction Investment Group Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hainan Hui Bang Construction Investment Group Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,784,350.00	1,784,350.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghca-37 26 Oct 2022	26 Oct 2022	Respondent, Plaintiff	LostThe court overturned the Judge’s finding that the Investment Agreement exists and set aside his orders for Mr Ma to return the Sum and Investment Returns to HHBC and for the Investment Returns to be assessed. The court also set aside the Judge’s order for Mr Ma to return the RMB680,000 allegedly paid to him in reimbursement of part of his personal income taxes and the order for the assessment of the remuneration and expenses of Mr Ma.
2	2022-sghc-13 17 Jan 2022	17 Jan 2022	Plaintiff	WonThe defendant is to return the principal sum of S$1,784,350, the RMB680,000 payment, and the investment returns – which are to be assessed – to the plaintiff, less the HK$2,785,000 which has already been returned. Against these sums owing to the plaintiff, the defendant is entitled to set off both his reasonable remuneration and his actual expenses (inclusive of (a) any tax he has in fact paid or will have to pay to the PRC tax authorities as a result of his performance of his duties under the Investment Agreement and (b) any interest accrued on these expenses, in accordance with Art 398 of the PRC Contract law). Both his remuneration and his expenses are to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.