Haniffa Pte Ltd

Haniffa Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Haniffa Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Mallal & Namazie	1 case	Namazie Mirza Mohamed Ong Ai Weern
ATMD Bird & Bird LLP	1 case	Alban Kang Deryne Sim Lifen
Wee Swee Teow LLP	1 case	Tan Hsuan Boon

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Haniffa Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33.3%
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Haniffa Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,500.00	2,166.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghc-270 31 Oct 2017	31 Oct 2017	Respondent	LostThe respondent was ordered to pay the applicant $6,500 and costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2017-sghc-248 05 Oct 2017	05 Oct 2017	Defendant, Respondent	DismissedClaim against the third defendant was struck out because it was a company that had never any interest in the Property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2012-sghc-69 29 Mar 2012	29 Mar 2012	Defendant	LostThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was successful, resulting in the invalidation of the defendant's trademarks and the defendant being ordered to pay costs to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).