How Weng Fan

How Weng Fan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

How Weng Fan has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Netto & Magin LLC	3 cases	Netto Leslie

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of How Weng Fan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	110.0 parties avg	10.0	33.3%
Partial	210.0 parties avg	10.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2022	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of How Weng Fan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sgca-42 28 Nov 2023	28 Nov 2023	Appellant, Respondent	PartialAppeal allowed in part in that the Employees succeeded in reversing some of the heads on which they had been found liable by the Judge but were held liable to STC in negligence for permitting the control failures in the System to exist.
2	2023-sgca-21 06 Jul 2023	06 Jul 2023	Appellant, Respondent	LostLiable to AHTC in negligence for permitting the control failures in the System. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2022-sgca-72 08 Nov 2022	08 Nov 2022	Appellant, Respondent	PartialAppeal allowed in part; the Court found that the Town Councillors and Employees did not owe fiduciary duties to AHTC.