Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd

Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	2 cases	Low Chai Chong Foo Maw Jiun Vernon Chua Gilbert Leong Huang Wenshan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sgca-28 25 May 2015	25 May 2015	Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; the Respondent's rights as a licensee cannot be asserted against the Appellants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2013-sghc-250 17 Nov 2013	17 Nov 2013	Defendant	WonJudgment for the defendant; the plaintiffs' action was dismissed.
3	2011-sghc-136 25 May 2011	25 May 2011	Defendant	LostDefendant's application to strike out portions of the plaintiff's statement of claim was dismissed with costs to the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).