Lim Yong Yeow, Thomas

Lim Yong Yeow, Thomas is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Lim Yong Yeow, Thomas has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Selvam LLC	3 cases	Sarbjit Singh Chopra Yuen Zi Gui Roshan Singh Chopra Sakthi Vel s/o Raman

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lim Yong Yeow, Thomas's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33.3%
Neutral	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33.3%
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	27.0 parties avg	7.0
2022	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lim Yong Yeow, Thomas's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Neutral	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghc-359 28 Dec 2023	28 Dec 2023	Defendant	WonThe application against the defendant was dismissed. No monetary amount was specified. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2023-sghc-234 22 Aug 2023	22 Aug 2023	Defendant	NeutralNo specific outcome recorded for this party.
3	2022-sghc-309 08 Dec 2022	08 Dec 2022	Defendant	LostAppeal to strike out the suit was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.