Louis Vuitton Malletier

Louis Vuitton Malletier is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 20.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Louis Vuitton Malletier has been represented by 4 law firms and 11 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Infinitus Law Corporation	2 cases	Wong Siew Hong G Radakrishnan
Ravindran Associates LLP	1 case	Chan Wenqiang Ravindran s/o Muthucumarasamy Jevon Louis
Ravindran Associates	1 case	Ravindran s/o Muthucumarasamy Jevon Louis Teo Kwan Soon Paul Yuen Kit Kuan
One Legal LLC	1 case	Anthony Soh Regina Quek Shawn Poon

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Louis Vuitton Malletier's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 1 (20.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60.0%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Louis Vuitton Malletier's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60.0%)	60.0%
Won	2(40.0%)	40.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	80,000.00	20,000.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2019-sgca-1 06 Jan 2019	06 Jan 2019	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs of SGD 45,000 to be paid to the respondent (includes disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2017-sghc-305 23 Nov 2017	23 Nov 2017	Plaintiff	LostClaim for trade mark infringement dismissed; costs awarded to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2015-sghcr-15 19 Jul 2015	19 Jul 2015	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; statutory damages awarded in the amount of $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2009-sgca-53 05 Nov 2009	05 Nov 2009	Respondent	LostThe respondent's claims for trade mark infringement, passing off, and breach of Section 55 of the Trade Marks Act were dismissed.
5	2009-sghc-24 28 Jan 2009	28 Jan 2009	Plaintiff	WonThe plaintiff succeeded in its claims on the grounds of infringement of trade mark under s 27(1) and (2) of the Act, in passing off and under s 55 of the Act. Injunctions as claimed are issued accordingly. There be an inquiry as to damages or an account of profits at the option of the plaintiff. There be delivery up of infringing articles within 14 days from the date of judgment or, alternatively, the defendant’s solicitors to confirm to the plaintiff’s solicitors by letter that there are no further infringing articles in the possession of the defendant. The defendant is to pay the plaintiff costs of the civil action. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.