Ma Hongjin

Ma Hongjin is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Ma Hongjin has been represented by 2 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eversheds Harry Elias LLP	1 case	Tan Chau Yee Seet Yao Dong
Cairnhill Law LLC	1 case	Derek Kang Yu Hsien Derek Kang Lim Shi Zheng Lucas Lucas Lim Kathy Chu

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ma Hongjin's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.7 parties avg	2.7	75.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ma Hongjin's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75.0%)	75.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	63,000.00	15,750.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2021-sghc-84 21 Apr 2021	21 Apr 2021	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim for fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation was dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
2	2020-sgca-106 27 Oct 2020	27 Oct 2020	Appellant, Plaintiff	LostAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $38,000, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2019-sghc-277 12 Dec 2019	12 Dec 2019	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's claim against the first defendant was dismissed due to a lack of consideration for the supplemental agreement. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2017-sghc-319 14 Dec 2017	14 Dec 2017	Plaintiff, Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; summary judgment granted for the Plaintiff; costs fixed at $25,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).