Mah Kiat Seng

Mah Kiat Seng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Their track record shows a 11.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 44.4% of their total caseload.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mah Kiat Seng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 4 (44.4%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.4 parties avg	2.4	55.6%
Partial	33.3 parties avg	3.3	33.3%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	11.1%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mah Kiat Seng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(55.6%)	55.6%
Partial	3(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(11.1%)	11.1%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	39,820.00	9,955.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghc-52 02 Mar 2023	02 Mar 2023	Plaintiff	PartialCosts awarded to the plaintiff for successful claim against Rosli.
2	2023-sghc-14 18 Jan 2023	18 Jan 2023	Plaintiff	WonGeneral damages of $20,000 awarded for false imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2021-sghc-202 26 Aug 2021	26 Aug 2021	Plaintiff, Appellant	PartialAppeal dismissed except for order of inspection of CCTV footage.
4	2021-sgca-79 10 Aug 2021	10 Aug 2021	Applicant, Appellant	LostThe applicant's motion for leave to raise questions of law of public interest was dismissed.
5	2019-sghc-108 28 Apr 2019	28 Apr 2019	Plaintiff	LostThe originating summons was dismissed with no order on costs.
6	2013-sghc-172 11 Sep 2013	11 Sep 2013	Defendant	LostThe defendant was declared a vexatious litigant and is restricted from filing further proceedings related to his conviction without leave of court.
7	2011-sgca-28 29 May 2011	29 May 2011	Applicant	LostApplication for leave to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
8	2011-sghc-47 28 Feb 2011	28 Feb 2011	Applicant	LostApplication to reserve questions of law to the Court of Appeal was dismissed.
9	2010-sghc-320 27 Oct 2010	27 Oct 2010	Appellant	PartialAppeal against conviction under s 13E(5)(a) of the Registration of Criminals Act allowed, and fine of $500 to be refunded. Appeal against conviction under s 13(2)(a) of the Registration of Criminals Act dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.