MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 3322
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 3322 is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 3322 has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Legal Solutions LLC | 2 cases |
Lumen Law Corporation | 2 cases |
Samuel Seow Law Corporation | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 3322's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 8.0
- Complex Cases
- 2 (66.7%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 38.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2016 | 38.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of MANAGEMENT CORPORATION STRATA TITLE PLAN NO 3322's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 1,750.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2016 | 1 3 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
12 Jun 2016 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondent. |
15 Mar 2016 | Plaintiff | LostThe court found that Tiong Aik and RSP were independent contractors of Mer Vue, the DSCs and NSCs were independent contractors of Tiong Aik, Squire Mech and Sitetectonix were independent contractors of RSP, Tiong Aik and RSP had limited statutory non-delegable duties under the Building Control Act with no apparent implications on their independent contractor defenses, RSP had not unreasonably delegated any of its professional duties, Mer Vue, Tiong Aik and RSP had taken proper care in the selection and appointment of their respective independent contractors, and that no private right of action is available to the Plaintiff for the alleged breach of statutory duty by Mer Vue under the BMSMA. |
01 Mar 2016 | Plaintiff, Appellant | LostAppeal against the dismissal of its application to amend its pleadings was dismissed; costs of $3,500 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the 1st Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |