Novelty Pte Ltd
Novelty Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm.
Legal Representation
Novelty Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Lee & Lee | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Novelty Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 23.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2009 | 13.0 parties avg |
2007 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Novelty Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2009 | 1 1 |
2007 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
30 Mar 2009 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs; the court upheld the High Court's decision that the Respondents' passing off claim and claim under Section 55(3)(a) of the Trade Marks Act had been made out. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
26 Nov 2007 | Defendant | LostInjunction granted to restrain the defendant from using the plaintiffs’ trade marks, in particular, Amanusa, in relation to any form of accommodation. The defendant was further ordered to apply to the Street and Building Names Board for a change of name for the Yio Chu Kang project and to inform the said board about my orders within 4 weeks from the date of pronouncement (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |