Pritam Singh

Pritam Singh is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Pritam Singh has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Andre Jumabhoy LLC	1 case	Andre Darius Jumabhoy Eng Zheng Yang Aristotle Emmanuel
Tan Rajah & Cheah	3 cases	Chelva Retnam Rajah

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pritam Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 8.0
Complex Cases: 3 (75.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Partial	210.0 parties avg	10.0	50.0%
Won	110.0 parties avg	10.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	210.0 parties avg	10.0
2022	110.0 parties avg	10.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pritam Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Partial	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2024-sghc-233 08 Sep 2024	08 Sep 2024	Applicant	LostApplication to transfer the case from the State Courts to the High Court was dismissed.
2	2023-sgca-42 28 Nov 2023	28 Nov 2023	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part in that the Town Councillors succeeded in reversing some of the heads on which they had been found liable by the Judge but were held liable to STC in negligence for permitting the control failures in the System to exist and Ms Lim was held liable to STC for causing AHTC to award a contract to Red-Power.
3	2023-sgca-21 06 Jul 2023	06 Jul 2023	Appellant	WonNot liable to AHTC for the control failures in the System. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2022-sgca-72 08 Nov 2022	08 Nov 2022	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part; the Court found that the Town Councillors and Employees did not owe fiduciary duties to AHTC.