Ram Niranjan

Ram Niranjan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Ram Niranjan has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Mallal & Namazie	3 cases	Tan Teng Muan Loh Li Qin

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ram Niranjan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33.3%
Partial	25.0 parties avg	5.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2019	25.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ram Niranjan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	920,000.00	460,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 2	Partial: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sgca-31 05 Apr 2020	05 Apr 2020	Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff	LostCA 205/2018 is dismissed.
2	2019-sghc-145 06 Jun 2019	06 Jun 2019	Plaintiff, Defendant	PartialCosts fixed at S$200,000, with disbursements allowed save for handwriting expert fees and 50% of hearing fees. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2019-sghc-138 28 May 2019	28 May 2019	Plaintiff, Defendant	PartialNavin was ordered to pay Ram S$720,000, being arrears of the Annual Allowance for the years from 2014 to 2017. Navin was found to hold sum of US$3,442,378.29 being Ram’s share of the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds (plus accrued interest), on trust for Ram. Navin was ordered to pay this sum to Ram. Ram is entitled to trace this sum into any traceable product; alternatively, Ram is entitled to an equitable lien over any traceable product. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.