Ramesh s/o Krishnan

Ramesh s/o Krishnan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Ramesh s/o Krishnan has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eugene Thuraisingam LLP	1 case	Cheong Jun Ming Mervyn Suang Wijaya Eugene Singarajah Thuraisingam

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ramesh s/o Krishnan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ramesh s/o Krishnan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,026,000.00	4,026,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghc-197 13 Aug 2017	13 Aug 2017	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $4,026,000 (SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2016-sgca-47 26 Jul 2016	26 Jul 2016	Appellant, Plaintiff	PartialAppeal allowed in part regarding the claim against AXA Life in relation to his application to join Prudential. The matter is to be remitted to the Judge for damages to be assessed. The Appellant is to have the costs of the appeal and of the trial in respect of only the negligence claim pertaining to his application to join Prudential, but not the negligence claim pertaining to his application to join Tokio Marine nor the defamation and the malicious falsehood claims. These costs are to be taxed if not agreed, and the usual consequential orders are to apply. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.