Shaik Abu Bakar Bin Abdul Sukol

Shaik Abu Bakar Bin Abdul Sukol is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Shaik Abu Bakar Bin Abdul Sukol has been represented by 3 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
S K Kumar Law Practice LLP	1 case	Udeh Kumar s/o Sethuraju Krishna Morthy
S K Kumar & Associates	1 case	Krishna Morthy
Frontier Law Corporation	1 case	Krishna Morthy SV

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Shaik Abu Bakar Bin Abdul Sukol's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Shaik Abu Bakar Bin Abdul Sukol's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sghc-251 17 Dec 2012	17 Dec 2012	Plaintiff	PartialJudgment for the plaintiff for 50% of damages to be assessed by the Registrar, due to contributory negligence. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2012-sgca-7 29 Jan 2012	29 Jan 2012	Respondent	LostAppeal allowed, precluding the respondent from pursuing common law claims for damages. No order as to costs here and below.
3	2011-sghc-181 01 Aug 2011	01 Aug 2011	Plaintiff	WonPlaintiff’s causes of action in Suit No 717 of 2009 against the Company, assuming that his receipt of part payment from the Scheme Manager was not in full and final settlement of his claim and causes of action, either in or apart from the Scheme, have not been extinguished and/or barred and/or precluded from being maintained.