Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd

Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms.

Legal Representation

Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Tan Peng Chin LLC	3 cases	Gopinath Pillai Jacqueline Teo Lin Jacqueline Teo
MPillay	1 case	Mohan R Pillay
Kelvin Chia Partnership	1 case	Glenn Cheng

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Spandeck Engineering (S) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	2(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	70,365.63	17,591.414 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 2	Partial: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2007-sgca-37 07 Aug 2007	07 Aug 2007	Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2006-sghc-229 11 Dec 2006	11 Dec 2006	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2005-sgca-59 26 Dec 2005	26 Dec 2005	Appellant	PartialAppeal dismissed subject to the qualification that the appellant is entitled to additional prolongation costs amounting to $10,035.46 in respect of its counterclaim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2005-sghc-86 28 Apr 2005	28 Apr 2005	Defendant	PartialDefendant's counterclaim allowed in part for prolongation costs and costs of employing a project manager and costs of rental of the gondola and external painting works (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).