Spectramed Pte Ltd

Spectramed Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Spectramed Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	Lai Yew Fei Melissa Marie Tan Shu Ling Melissa Tan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Spectramed Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	18.0 parties avg	8.0	50.0%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Spectramed Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	602,276.54	301,138.272 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2011-sghc-43 24 Feb 2011	24 Feb 2011	Plaintiff, Respondent	PartialClaim allowed against Samantha, Jimmy and Absolute in Suit 681 for breach of fiduciary duties. Claim against Karen dismissed. Judgment against Samantha for $2,276.54 for unauthorized petrol claims (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2010-sghc-112 13 Apr 2010	13 Apr 2010	Plaintiff	WonMareva injunction granted against the first, second, and fourth defendants on their assets up to the value of S$600,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).