Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd

Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd has been represented by 1 law firm and 1 counsel.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Ng & Koh	2 cases	Ng Yuen

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Chiang Brother's Marble (S) Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,226.40	4,113.202 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2002-sgca-21 03 Apr 2002	03 Apr 2002	Applicant, Appellant	WonApplication to review and set aside the ruling made by Rajendran J was allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2001-sghc-386 29 Nov 2001	29 Nov 2001	Plaintiff	PartialThe plaintiffs are entitled to final judgment in the sum of $5,035.84 and GST on the contract sum of $3.2m, equivalent to $96,000. The plaintiffs are awarded interlocutory judgment for the 33 variation claims admitted by the defendants, which claims shall be assessed by the Registrar with costs of assessment reserved to him. Their claims for variation orders nos. 8, 12 and 14 are dismissed with costs. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.