Tan Mui Keow Claire
Tan Mui Keow Claire is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 1 counsel. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 25.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Tan Mui Keow Claire has been represented by 2 law firms and 1 counsel.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC | 1 case |
Cheo Yeoh and Associates LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Tan Mui Keow Claire's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.5
- Complex Cases
- 1 (25.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 15.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 13.0 parties avg |
13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2010 | 23.0 parties avg |
2008 | 15.0 parties avg |
2004 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Tan Mui Keow Claire's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(25.0%) |
Neutral | 1(25.0%) |
Won | 1(25.0%) |
1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2010 | 2 11 |
2008 | 1 1 |
2004 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
21 Dec 2010 | Defendant | NeutralThe outcome for Tan Mui Keow Claire is neutral as the focus of the appeal was on the second defendant, Mainstream Limited. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
02 May 2010 | Defendant | Unknown |
27 Mar 2008 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Oct 2004 | Defendant | WonThe application against the defendant was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction. |