Tan Thiam Chye
Tan Thiam Chye is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 25.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Tan Thiam Chye has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
James Chai & Partners | 2 cases |
Circular Law Chambers LLP | 1 case |
Independent Practitioner | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Tan Thiam Chye's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.3
- Complex Cases
- 1 (25.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 33.3 parties avg |
Won | 13.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 13.0 parties avg |
2021 | 13.0 parties avg |
2020 | 15.0 parties avg |
2007 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Tan Thiam Chye's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(75.0%) |
Won | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 609,391.734 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 1 1 |
2021 | 1 1 |
2020 | 1 1 |
2007 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
05 Apr 2022 | Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant | LostAppeal against the Judge’s decision to (a) not award him loss of profits and/or dividends and (b) not order interest on the Sum to run from 13 August 2015, is dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Jul 2021 | Plaintiff | WonThe court awarded judgment to Tan Thiam Chye in Suit 1089. Tan Chin Hock is to pay Tan Thiam Chye S$2,314,041.39 with interest at 5.33% per annum from the date of the writ (i.e., 11 November 2020) until payment. Assumed SGD as the case is in Singapore. |
05 Oct 2020 | Defendant | LostObjection to collective sale dismissed; ordered to pay costs of S$70,000 and disbursements of S$53,525.54 to the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
09 Dec 2007 | Appellant | LostAppeal against maintenance orders dismissed, with a minor variation removing the words 'until Respondent secures employment' from the $1 per month maintenance order. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |