The Bank of East Asia, Limited

The Bank of East Asia, Limited is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

The Bank of East Asia, Limited has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Chua Beng Chye Raelene Pereira Chan Min Hui Tan Shu Ying Cherie
Rajah & Tan Singapore LLP	1 case	Chua Beng Chye Cherie Tan Raelene Pereira

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of The Bank of East Asia, Limited's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.8
Complex Cases: 2 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Won	38.3 parties avg	8.3	75.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	211.5 parties avg	11.5
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of The Bank of East Asia, Limited's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Won	3(75.0%)	75.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,000.00	1,500.002 cases	2
USD	1,789,398.56	1,789,398.561 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sghc-261 22 Oct 2017	22 Oct 2017	Plaintiff, Respondent	WonAppeals by the defendants were dismissed. Costs of $3000 for each appeal plus disbursements were awarded to the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2017-sghc-38 01 Mar 2017	01 Mar 2017	Defendant	WonEntitled to claim proceeds from the sale of pepper stock in proportion to their contribution. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2016-sgca-66 28 Nov 2016	28 Nov 2016	Respondent	LostThe court dismissed the appeal.
4	2015-sghc-328 23 Dec 2015	23 Dec 2015	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff for US$1,154,414.65 and US$634,983.91, plus interest and costs on an indemnity basis. The currency is specified in the judgment.