The Bank of East Asia Ltd
The Bank of East Asia Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 66.7% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
The Bank of East Asia Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Rajah & Tann LLP | 1 case |
Ho and Wee | 1 case |
Joseph Hoo Morris & Kumar | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of The Bank of East Asia Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.7
- Complex Cases
- 2 (66.7%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 33.7 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2014 | 12.0 parties avg |
2004 | 14.0 parties avg |
2000 | 15.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of The Bank of East Asia Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Won | 3(100.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 823,787.913 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2014 | 1 1 |
2004 | 1 1 |
2000 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
27 Mar 2014 | Plaintiff, Respondent | WonJudgment for the sum of S$1,832,070.53 as at 2 December 2013, and default interest on that sum at the rate of the plaintiff’s prevailing prime lending rate plus 6% per annum from 3 December 2013 until the date of payment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
12 Jul 2004 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the plaintiff against the three defendants together with interest and costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed. |
26 Nov 2000 | Plaintiff | WonPlaintiffs' claim allowed for the sum claimed less $400,000 received plus interest and costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |