VTV
VTV is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm.
Legal Representation
VTV has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Damodara Ong LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of VTV's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.0
- Complex Cases
- 0 (0.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 12.0 parties avg |
Partial | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 12.0 parties avg |
2021 | 12.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of VTV's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(50.0%) |
Partial | 1(50.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 1,264,562.382 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2022 | 1 1 |
2021 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
16 Aug 2022 | Defendant | PartialEntitled to 50% of the total matrimonial assets valued at $5,058,249.50. The court ordered each party to retain assets under their own name, [EE] Tax, [EE] PLT and [Property A] Unit No. 3A to be given to the Husband, and the sale proceeds of the Matrimonial Home to be transferred to the Wife. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
09 Aug 2021 | Defendant | LostHusband's application to vary care and control orders was not allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |