Irregular Judgment

Irregular Judgment is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 1 cases from 2007 to 2007.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Irregular Judgment, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Lin Yan Yan (1 cases) Harpreet Singh SC (1 cases)	Canberra Development v Mercurine: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Excessive Sum(Jun 2007)
Legal Solutions LLC100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Kelvin Teo (1 cases) Christopher Chong (1 cases)	Canberra Development v Mercurine: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Excessive Sum(Jun 2007)

Leading lawyers practicing in Irregular Judgment, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Kelvin Teo100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Canberra Development v Mercurine: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Excessive Sum(Jun 2007)
Christopher Chong100.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Canberra Development v Mercurine: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Excessive Sum(Jun 2007)
Lin Yan Yan0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Canberra Development v Mercurine: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Excessive Sum(Jun 2007)
Harpreet Singh SC0.00% success rate	1 cases100.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Canberra Development v Mercurine: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Excessive Sum(Jun 2007)

Displaying 1 most recent judgments out of 1 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Canberra Development v Mercurine: Setting Aside Default Judgment for Excessive Sum	High Court	27 Jun 2007	Default Judgment set aside.