Sham Defence

Sham Defence is a specialized practice area in Singapore's legal system. This area encompasses 2 cases from 2000 to 2009.

Leading Law Firms

Analysis of law firms specializing in Sham Defence, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Law Firm	Cases	Success Rate	Key Lawyers	Recent Cases
Murthy & Co0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	A P Thirumurthy (1 cases)	Singapore Investments v Golden Asia: Appeal Dismissed for Counsel's Lack of Preparedness(Jun 2009)
KhattarWong100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Hee Theng Fong (1 cases) Noelle Seet (1 cases)	Singapore Investments v Golden Asia: Appeal Dismissed for Counsel's Lack of Preparedness(Jun 2009)

Leading lawyers practicing in Sham Defence, ranked by case volume and success rates.

Lawyer	Cases	Success Rate	Expertise Level	Recent Cases
Hee Theng Fong100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced50% relevance score	Singapore Investments v Golden Asia: Appeal Dismissed for Counsel's Lack of Preparedness(Jun 2009)
A P Thirumurthy0.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	0.00% success rate	Experienced50% relevance score	Singapore Investments v Golden Asia: Appeal Dismissed for Counsel's Lack of Preparedness(Jun 2009)
Noelle Seet100.00% success rate	1 cases50.0% of area	100.00% success rate	Experienced50% relevance score	Singapore Investments v Golden Asia: Appeal Dismissed for Counsel's Lack of Preparedness(Jun 2009)

Displaying 2 most recent judgments out of 2 total cases

No.	Title	Court	Decision Date	Outcomes
1	Singapore Investments v Golden Asia: Appeal Dismissed for Counsel's Lack of Preparedness	High Court	28 Jun 2009	Appeal dismissed with costs and disbursements fixed at $7,000 to be paid personally by Mr Thirumurthy.
2		-	13 Jan 2000	Unknown