Doshi v Doshi: Revocation of Probate in Singapore after Malaysian Revocation

In Jigarlal Kantilal Doshi v Damayanti Kantilal Doshi, the Singapore Court of Appeal addressed an appeal by Jigarlal Kantilal Doshi seeking the revocation of a grant of probate issued to Damayanti Kantilal Doshi and Jogesh Kantilal Doshi by the District Court in Singapore, concerning the will of the late Kantilal Prabhulal Doshi. The application was initially dismissed by the High Court. The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, directing the respondents to furnish a full report of all the assets of the estate in Singapore and give a full and complete account of the administration of the estate in Singapore at regular intervals to the Public Trustee.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal dismissed. The Court directed the respondents to furnish a full report of all the assets of the estate in Singapore and give a full and complete account of the administration of the estate in Singapore at regular intervals to the Public Trustee.

1.3 Case Type

Probate

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Singapore Court of Appeal considers revoking a grant of probate in Singapore after the Malaysian courts revoked the grant due to improper administration.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Jigarlal Kantilal DoshiAppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost
Damayanti Kantilal Doshi (Executrix)RespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWon
Jogesh Kantilal DoshiRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJustice of AppealYes
L P TheanJustice of AppealNo
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeNo

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The deceased, Kantilal Prabhulal Doshi, died domiciled in Malaysia.
  2. The deceased made a will on 30 April 1991, appointing his wife and youngest son as executors and trustees.
  3. The respondents were granted probate of the will by the High Court of Malaya at Johor Bahru on 15 October 1991, but the grant was later revoked.
  4. The Malaysian Court of Appeal affirmed the revocation of the grant of probate in Malaysia.
  5. The respondents obtained a grant of probate in Singapore without disclosing the revocation in Malaysia.
  6. The appellant sought to revoke the grant of probate in Singapore.
  7. The Public Trustee Incorporated (Amanah Raya Berhad) was appointed to administer the estate of the deceased in Malaysia.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Jigarlal Kantilal Doshi v Damayanti Kantilal Doshi (Executrix) and Another, CA 101/1997, [2000] SGCA 54

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Will made by Kantilal Prabhulal Doshi
Kantilal Prabhulal Doshi killed
Probate of will granted by High Court of Malaya at Johor Bahru
Originating motion filed in High Court of Malaya at Johor Bahru to revoke grant
High Court revokes grant and appoints Official Administrator
Stay of execution of revocation order obtained from Court of Appeal
Grant of probate made by District Court in Singapore
Originating motion filed in High Court seeking order to revoke grant
High Court dismisses application
Malaysian Court of Appeal dismisses appeal, affirming revocation of grant
Second respondent filed affidavit
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Revocation of Grant of Probate
    • Outcome: The Court dismissed the appeal, declining to revoke the grant of probate in Singapore, but directed the respondents to furnish a full report of all the assets of the estate in Singapore and give a full and complete account of the administration of the estate in Singapore at regular intervals to the Public Trustee.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Undue and improper administration of the estate
      • Disregard of the interests of the beneficiaries

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Revocation of the grant of probate

9. Cause of Actions

  • No cause of actions

10. Practice Areas

  • Probate Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Damayanti Kantilal Doshi & Ors v Jigarlal Kantilal Doshi & OrsCourt of Appeal of MalaysiaYes[1998] 4 MLJ 268MalaysiaThe Malaysian Court of Appeal affirmed the decision of the High Court in Johor Bahru, which revoked the respondents’ grant of probate. The Singapore court gave due recognition to the findings and determination of the courts in the principal jurisdiction.
Fazil Rahman & Ors v Nachiappa ChettiarN/ANo[1963] MLJ 309N/ACited for the definition of 'sufficient cause' to mean 'undue and improper administration of the estate in total disregard of the interests of the beneficiaries'.
Re Khoo Boo Gong, deceasedN/ANo[1981] 2 MLJ 68N/ACited for the definition of 'sufficient cause' to mean 'undue and improper administration of the estate in total disregard of the interests of the beneficiaries'.
Tan Khay Seng v Tan Kay Choon & AnorN/ANo[1990] 1 MLJ 51N/ACited for the definition of 'sufficient cause' to mean 'undue and improper administration of the estate in total disregard of the interests of the beneficiaries'.
Re Shaik Abdullah, deceasedN/ANo[1941] MLJ 6N/ACited to support the point that the court has discretion in exercising its power under s 32 of the Probate and Administration Act (Cap 251).
Damayanti Kantilal Doshi & Anor v Shobhana J DoshiN/ANo[1998] 1 SLR 530SingaporeRelated to the action in Suit 707/93 in respect of the moneys in the account with Banque Luxembourg.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Probate and Administration Act (Cap 251, 2000 Rev Ed) s 32Singapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Probate
  • Grant of probate
  • Revocation
  • Executors
  • Trustees
  • Sufficient cause
  • Principal jurisdiction
  • Ancillary jurisdiction
  • Public Trustee

15.2 Keywords

  • Probate
  • Revocation
  • Executors
  • Trustees
  • Singapore
  • Malaysia
  • Estate
  • Administration

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Probate
  • Estate Administration
  • Conflict of Laws