Samuel Chacko

Samuel Chacko is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 27 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and corporate restructuring. Their track record shows a 36.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 30% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Samuel Chacko has demonstrated expertise across 90 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	22 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 22 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	7 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Express trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Anton Piller Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third party proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Management Consultancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Power of Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty of confidentiality	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Privity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of opportunity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Securities Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Samuel Chacko has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 18 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legis Point LLC	18 cases	67% of cases	Chainani v Singh: Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties in Dormant Companies(May 2024) Ambihathevi v Jeevarajah: Interlocutory Injunction for Property Transfer & Exclusion(Jun 2021) Ho Yew Kong v ERC Holdings: Trust, Disclaimer, Quistclose Trust & Constructive Trust(Nov 2018)
Colin Ng & Partners	5 cases	19% of cases	Irawan Darsono v Ong Soon Kiat: Enforceability of Illegal Share Purchase Agreement under Securities Industry Act(Jun 2002) Momentum Creations v Tan Eng Koon: Passing Off & Furniture Design Dispute(Jun 2001) Specialty Laboratories Asia Pte Ltd: Validity of Statutory Demand & Winding Up Petition(Mar 2001)
Colin Ng and Partners	3 cases	11% of cases	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order(Apr 2005) Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals(Sep 2004) XACCT Technologies Ltd v Orient Telecommunication Networks: Discovery of Internal Documents(Jun 2004)
LegisPoint LLC	1 cases	4% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Tan Phuay Khiang: Professional Misconduct and Conflict of Interest(Jun 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Samuel Chacko's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 8 (30%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	123.5 parties avg	3.5	44%
Neutral	25.5 parties avg	5.5	7%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Partial	34.3 parties avg	4.3	11%
Won	103.1 parties avg	3.1	37%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2001	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2004	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2010	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	35.7 parties avg	5.7
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Samuel Chacko's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(43%)	43%
Neutral	2(7%)	7%
Other	1(4%)	4%
Partial	3(11%)	11%
Won	10(36%)	36%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	427,453.12	35,621.0912 cases	12
USD	4,496,409.00	1,498,803.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Other: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2018	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 27 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chainani v Singh: Shareholder Oppression & Director's Duties in Dormant Companies 05 May 2024 Tarun Hotchand Chainani (Plaintiff)Won	05 May 2024	Tarun Hotchand Chainani (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court ordered the winding up of both companies and directed the Defendant to provide a detailed account of the investments made with company funds. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ambihathevi v Jeevarajah: Interlocutory Injunction for Property Transfer & Exclusion 27 Jun 2021 Jeevarajah Nithiananthan (Defendant)Lost	27 Jun 2021	Jeevarajah Nithiananthan (Defendant): Injunction granted against defendantInterlocutory injunction granted against the defendant, excluding him from the property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ho Yew Kong v ERC Holdings: Trust, Disclaimer, Quistclose Trust & Constructive Trust 26 Nov 2018 Ho Yew Kong (Plaintiff)Neutral	26 Nov 2018	Ho Yew Kong (Plaintiff): NeutralFiled interpleader action; no direct win or loss.
4	Sakae Holdings Ltd v Gryphon Real Estate: Oppression of Minority Shareholders & Director's Fiduciary Duties 03 May 2017 Ho Yew Kong (Defendant)Lost	03 May 2017	Ho Yew Kong (Defendant): Unsuccessful in defending the claimsHo Yew Kong was unsuccessful in defending the claims against him.
5	Siva Industries v Foreguard Shipping: Security for Costs Application 26 Apr 2017 Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff)Other	26 Apr 2017	Siva Industries and Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff): Security for costs to be providedPlaintiff to provide security for Defendant's costs, conditional on Defendant discontinuing counterclaim if Plaintiff's claim is struck out.
6	Metropole Pte Ltd v Designshop Pte Ltd: Building & Construction Industry Security of Payment Act Dispute 06 Mar 2017 Designshop Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	06 Mar 2017	Designshop Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedMetropole's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and the sum of $111,807.12 which Metropole paid into court under s 27(5) of the Act together with all interest accrued thereon was released to Designshop Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Sports Connection v Asia Law Corp: Professional Negligence, Trademark, Damages Assessment 13 Aug 2015 Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Aug 2015	Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action against the defendants was dismissed in its entirety. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	PT Central Investindo v Franciscus Wongso: Challenge to Arbitrator's Impartiality and Setting Aside of Award 29 Sep 2014 PT Central Investindo (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	29 Sep 2014	PT Central Investindo (Applicant, Respondent): Application DismissedApplication to remove arbitrator and set aside award dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Dynasty Line v. Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director's Liability in Share Pledge 28 Apr 2014 Sukamto Sia (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	28 Apr 2014	Sukamto Sia (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedCivil Appeal No 103 of 2013 dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	eSys Technologies v nTan: Contractual Interpretation, Value Added Fee, and Restructuring 24 Mar 2013 eSys Technologies Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	24 Mar 2013	eSys Technologies Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs.
11	eSys Technologies v nTan Corporate Advisory: Dispute over Consultancy Fees and Value-Added Fee Entitlement 28 Jun 2012 eSys Technologies Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jun 2012	eSys Technologies Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for a refund of the balance of the deposit is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Rainforest Trading Ltd v State Bank of India: Enforceability of Equitable Mortgage and Conversion of Originating Summons 20 Mar 2012 Rainforest Trading Ltd (Appellant)Lost	20 Mar 2012	Rainforest Trading Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
13	SBI Singapore v Rainforest Trading: Enforcement of Share Pledge & Fraud Allegations 03 Aug 2011 eSys Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	03 Aug 2011	eSys Technologies Pte Ltd (Defendant): Defense UnsuccessfulThe defendant's allegations of fraud were rejected, and the plaintiff was granted the declarations sought. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Chua June Ching Michelle v Chai Hoi Tong: Adverse Possession Claim Over Amoy Street Property 28 Jul 2011 Chai Hoi Tong (Defendant)Lost	28 Jul 2011	Chai Hoi Tong (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe Defendant's counterclaim for the removal of the Caveat against the Property, direction to the Registrar of Land Titles to remove the Caveat, and damages was dismissed.
15	Sports Connection v Asia Law Corp: Taxation of Legal Fees & Special Circumstances 22 Jul 2010 Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	22 Jul 2010	Sports Connection Pte Ltd (Applicant): Partial Order for Taxation GrantedTaxation ordered for some invoices but not others.
16	RBS Coutts Bank v Kothari: Summary Judgment & Conclusive Evidence Clauses in Forex Trading Dispute 02 Dec 2009 Shishir Tarachand Kothari (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2009	Shishir Tarachand Kothari (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Defendant owes Plaintiff USD 569,109.
17	PT Jaya v Kristle: Guarantee, Indemnity & Limitation Act Dispute 27 May 2009 Kristle Trading Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Won	27 May 2009	Kristle Trading Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	International Coal v Kristle Trading: Arbitration Confidentiality & Issue Estoppel 21 Oct 2008 Kazushi Toyoshige (Defendant)Won	21 Oct 2008	Kazushi Toyoshige (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe claim against the defendant was dismissed with costs.
19	Law Society of Singapore v Tan Phuay Khiang: Professional Misconduct and Conflict of Interest 25 Jun 2007 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	25 Jun 2007	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application GrantedApplication granted; respondent suspended from practice for two years (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
20	CHS CPO GmbH v Vikas Goel: Fortification of Undertakings for Mareva Injunction & Anton Piller Order 25 Apr 2005 Esys Distribution Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	25 Apr 2005	Esys Distribution Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Application allowed in partApplication for fortification of undertakings as to damages allowed in part in the amount of S$315,646 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Sumitomo v Salim: Applications to Adduce Further Evidence and File Single Case at Substantive Appeals 02 Sep 2004 The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	02 Sep 2004	The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co Ltd (Respondent): Application adjournedThe court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to hear the applications for the adduction of fresh evidence and directed that they be adjourned to be heard before the full Court of Appeal.
22	XACCT Technologies Ltd v Orient Telecommunication Networks: Discovery of Internal Documents 30 Jun 2004 XACCT Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Jun 2004	XACCT Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's request for specific discovery was set aside, and the defendant's appeal was allowed. The plaintiff's claim for US$427,300 was not addressed in the judgment extract.
23	Irawan Darsono v Ong Soon Kiat: Enforceability of Illegal Share Purchase Agreement under Securities Industry Act 25 Jun 2002 Arhawishanto International Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	25 Jun 2002	Arhawishanto International Holdings Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims made by Arhawishanto International Holdings Pte Ltd were dismissed.
24	Momentum Creations v Tan Eng Koon: Passing Off & Furniture Design Dispute 19 Jun 2001 Momentum Creations Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Jun 2001	Momentum Creations Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; an injunction was granted and the Defendant is to account to the Plaintiffs for profits made by the Defendant in the sale of L-shape sofas, coffee tables and sideboards similar to the "Case" or "Globe" sofas, "Graves" coffee tables or the "Catena" sideboards sold by the Plaintiffs which sale is due to the use of: (a) any of the Plaintiffs’ said leaflets and/or, (b) any of the names "Case" or "Globe" for the L-shape sofas, "Graves" for the coffee tables and "Catena" for the sideboards and/or, (c) any representation made by the Defendant, his agents or servants that the L-shape sofas, coffee tables or sideboards sold for or on behalf of the Defendant and which are similar in design to the Plaintiffs’ "Case", "Globe", "Catena" or "Graves" furniture is from the same manufacturer or supplier as the Plaintiffs’ or that the Defendant is in any way connected with the Plaintiffs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
25	Specialty Laboratories Asia Pte Ltd: Validity of Statutory Demand & Winding Up Petition 27 Mar 2001 Paul Frank Fasi (Respondent)Won	27 Mar 2001	Paul Frank Fasi (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts awarded to Paul Frank Fasi. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
26	Hatton National Bank v Ocean Gourmet: Validity of Bills of Exchange & Estoppel 05 Dec 2000 Hatton National Bank Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	05 Dec 2000	Hatton National Bank Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffAppeal dismissed with costs. The court upheld the assistant registrar's decision to grant summary judgment in favor of Hatton National Bank. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Doshi v Doshi: Revocation of Probate in Singapore after Malaysian Revocation 27 Sep 2000 Jogesh Kantilal Doshi (Respondent)Won	27 Sep 2000	Jogesh Kantilal Doshi (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. The Court directed the respondents to furnish a full report of all the assets of the estate in Singapore and give a full and complete account of the administration of the estate in Singapore at regular intervals to the Public Trustee.