Tng Eng Chye v Chia Kim Chua: Application to Vacate Trial Dates in Trust Monies Dispute
In Tng Eng Chye alias Tng Eng Chye, Robert v Chia Kim Chua and Kong Kai Cheong, the High Court of Singapore, presided over by Judicial Commissioner Amarjeet Singh on 18 January 2000, dismissed the defendants' application to vacate the trial dates. The plaintiff claimed for an account and inquiry regarding trust monies withdrawn by the defendants without his consent. The court found that the defendants had sufficient time to prepare their case and file an amended defense and counterclaim.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Defendants' application to vacate trial dates dismissed.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Application to vacate trial dates in a dispute over trust monies withdrawn without consent. The court dismissed the application, citing sufficient time for preparation.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tng Eng Chye alias Tng Eng Chye, Robert | Plaintiff | Individual | Costs awarded | Won | |
Chia Kim Chua | Defendant | Individual | Application to vacate trial dates dismissed | Lost | |
Kong Kai Cheong | Defendant | Individual | Application to vacate trial dates dismissed | Lost |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Amarjeet Singh | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
K Jayabalan | Cooma Lau & Loh |
Leung Wing Wah | B T Tan & Company |
4. Facts
- The Plaintiff claimed for an account and inquiry regarding monies held in trust by the Defendants.
- The Defendants allegedly withdrew monies from the trust without the Plaintiff's knowledge and consent.
- The Defendants sought to file an amended defense and counterclaim.
- The trial dates had already been vacated once before.
- The Defendants' Counsel applied to vacate the new trial dates shortly before the trial.
- The Registry vacated the trial dates due to the unavailability of a judge.
5. Formal Citations
- Tng Eng Chye alias Tng Eng Chye, Robert v Chia Kim Chua and Another, Suit 512/1999, SIC Entered No 7568 of 1999, [2000] SGHC 11
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Trial dates vacated by the trial judge. | |
Pre-Trial Conference held; new trial dates fixed. | |
Defendants' Counsel received legal papers from previous solicitors. | |
Defendants' Counsel appointed and instructed. | |
Defendants' solicitor's Affidavit dated. | |
Summons for Directions filed by Defendants' Counsel. | |
Hearing on Summons for Directions. | |
Trial dates vacated by the Registry. | |
Scheduled trial date. | |
Scheduled trial date. | |
Appeal filed by the Defendants' solicitors. | |
Decision date. |
7. Legal Issues
- Application to Vacate Trial Dates
- Outcome: The court dismissed the application to vacate the trial dates.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Account of monies
- Inquiry of monies
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Trust
10. Practice Areas
- Litigation
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Trust monies
- Vacate trial dates
- Amended defence
- Counterclaim
- Summons for Directions
15.2 Keywords
- trust
- monies
- trial
- vacate
- application
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Civil Procedure | 70 |
Trust Law | 60 |
Duty to Account | 50 |
Evidence Law | 40 |
Administrative Law | 30 |
Costs | 30 |
16. Subjects
- Civil Litigation
- Trusts