B T Tan & Company
B T Tan & Company is a law firm operating in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The firm has handled 11 cases in Singapore's courts. Supported by a team of 7 counsels. The firm demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and construction law. Their track record shows a 36.4% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 27.3% of their total caseload.
Areas of Practice and Expertise
B T Tan & Company has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and property law.
| Practice Area | Case Volume |
|---|---|
| Breach of Contract | 3 cases |
| Property Law | 3 cases |
| Building and Construction Contracts | 2 cases |
| Administrative Law | 2 cases |
| Construction Law | 2 cases |
| Child Support | 1 cases |
| Child Custody | 1 cases |
| Construction Contracts | 1 cases |
| Civil Practice | 1 cases |
| Business Law | 1 cases |
Legal Team and Representation
B T Tan & Company has 7 notable counsels who have represented clients in various cases. The most active counsel has handled 7 cases.
| Counsel Name | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Tan Bar Tien | 7 cases |
| Winston Quek Seng Soon | 2 cases |
| Winston Quek | 2 cases |
| Leung Wing Wah | 1 cases |
| Sylvia Tan | 1 cases |
| Tan Xin Er, Sylvie | 1 cases |
| Tan Xin Er, Slyvie | 1 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of B T Tan & Company's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.5
- Complex Cases
- 3 (27.3%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 42.7 parties avg |
| Won | 44.2 parties avg |
| Partial | 32.3 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2000 | 13.0 parties avg |
| 2001 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2003 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2008 | 23.8 parties avg |
| 2012 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2013 | 14.0 parties avg |
| 2017 | 16.0 parties avg |
| 2018 | 12.0 parties avg |
| 2019 | 22.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of B T Tan & Company's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 4(36.4%) |
| Won | 4(36.4%) |
| Partial | 3(27.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 371199.718 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2000 | 01 1 |
| 2001 | 01 1 |
| 2003 | 01 1 |
| 2008 | 011 11 |
| 2012 | 01 1 |
| 2013 | 01 1 |
| 2017 | 01 1 |
| 2018 | 01 1 |
| 2019 | 011 11 |
Represented Parties
List of parties represented by B T Tan & Company in various cases
| Party Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| UTMDefendant Partial (1) | 1 case |
| Ong Beng ChongAppellant Won (1) | 1 case |
| Edmund Tie & Company (SEA) Pte LtdApplicant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| DEVAGI D/O NARAYANAN @ DEVAKI NAIRPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
| SHAIKH ANWAR ISHAKPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
| Public ProsecutorRespondent Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Tan Kim GuanPlaintiff Won (1) | 1 case |
| Yap Boon Keng SonnyPlaintiff Partial (1) | 1 case |
| Lai Shit HarAppellant Won (1) | 1 case |
| Wong Yiat Hong RaymondAppellant Won (1) | 1 case |
| Lim Ek KianAppellant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| AL Stainless Industries Pte LtdPlaintiff Partial (1) | 1 case |
| Chia Kim ChuaDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
| Kong Kai CheongDefendant Lost (1) | 1 case |
Case History
Displaying all 11 cases
| Case |
|---|
06 May 2019 UTMPartial |
04 Apr 2019 Ong Beng ChongWon |
18 Apr 2018 Edmund Tie & Company (SEA) Pte LtdLost |
28 Jun 2017 DEVAGI D/O NARAYANAN @ DEVAKI NAIRWon SHAIKH ANWAR ISHAKWon |
26 Sep 2013 Public ProsecutorLost |
13 Mar 2012 Tan Kim GuanWon |
22 Sep 2008 Yap Boon Keng SonnyPartial |
27 Jul 2008 Lai Shit HarWon Wong Yiat Hong RaymondWon |
17 Mar 2003 Lim Ek KianLost |
27 Aug 2001 AL Stainless Industries Pte LtdPartial |
17 Jan 2000 Chia Kim ChuaLost Kong Kai CheongLost |