Tan Poh Leng Stanley v Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey: Arbitrator's Power to Reverse Final Award
In Tan Poh Leng Stanley v Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey, the Singapore High Court considered whether an arbitrator has the power to revisit and reverse a final award. The arbitrator initially dismissed the claimant's claim and the respondent's counterclaim in a January award. Subsequently, the arbitrator issued a March award reversing the decision on the respondent's counterclaim. The High Court, in a decision by G P Selvam J, set aside the March award, holding that the arbitrator was functus officio and lacked the authority to reverse the initial final award. The court ordered the respondent to pay the applicant's costs.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
March Award set aside; January Award to stand.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court addressed whether an arbitrator has the power to recall and reverse a final award. The court set aside the arbitrator's second additional award, reinforcing the principle of functus officio.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey | Respondent | Individual | Motion dismissed | Lost | |
Tan Poh Leng Stanley | Applicant | Individual | Motion granted | Won |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
G P Selvam | Judge | Yes |
4. Counsels
4. Facts
- The arbitrator made a final award on 10 January 2000, dismissing both the claimants' claim and the respondents' counterclaim.
- On 17 January 2000, the arbitrator added a clarification award.
- On 31 January 2000, the arbitrator held a fresh hearing at the request of the respondent.
- On 6 March 2000, the arbitrator made another award, reversing the decision on the respondent's counterclaim.
- Stanley Tan filed a notice of motion on 29 April 2000 to set aside the March award.
5. Formal Citations
- Tan Poh Leng Stanley v Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey, OM 14/2000, [2000] SGHC 260
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Settlement agreement signed | |
Supplemental agreement evidenced by exchange of letters | |
Arbitrator made the January award | |
Arbitrator added the clarification award | |
Fresh hearing held at the request of Jeffrey Tang | |
Arbitrator made the March Award | |
Stanley Tan filed notice of OM 14/2000 | |
Judgment issued |
7. Legal Issues
- Power of Arbitrator to Recall and Reverse Final Award
- Outcome: The court held that the arbitrator did not have the power to recall and reverse the final award after becoming functus officio.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Functus officio
- Termination of mandate
- Time Limit for Application to Set Aside Award
- Outcome: The court held that the three-month time limit stipulated in art 34 of the Model Law applied, and the application to set aside was not filed out of time.
- Category: Procedural
8. Remedies Sought
- Setting aside of arbitral award
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of contract
10. Practice Areas
- Arbitration
11. Industries
- No industries specified
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Montan | N/A | Yes | [1984] 1 Lloyd`s Rep 389 | N/A | Cited for the principle that the power to correct a clerical error must not be converted into a power to reconsider and reverse the substantive decision. |
Fidelitas Shipping Co Ltd v V/O Exportchleb | N/A | Yes | [1966] 1 QB 630 | N/A | Cited as authority for the proposition that once the arbitrator has made a formal award on a specific matter he has no power to reconsider that award. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Arbitration
- Arbitral tribunal
- Arbitrator
- Functus officio
- Final award
- International Arbitration Act
- UNCITRAL Model Law
- Jurisdiction
- Mandate
15.2 Keywords
- Arbitration
- Arbitrator
- Functus officio
- International Arbitration Act
- UNCITRAL Model Law
- Singapore
17. Areas of Law
Area Name | Relevance Score |
---|---|
Functus Officio | 98 |
Arbitration | 95 |
International Arbitration Act | 90 |
International Commercial Contracts | 60 |
16. Subjects
- Arbitration
- Civil Procedure