Alvin Yeo

Alvin Yeo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 109 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and trust law. Their track record shows a 36.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 41 complex cases, representing 38% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Alvin Yeo has demonstrated expertise across 283 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	80 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 80 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	40 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 40 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	29 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 29 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	26 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 26 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	26 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 26 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	22 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 22 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	16 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 16 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	14 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	14 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	14 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	14 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	14 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	13 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 13 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	11 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	11 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	10 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	10 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	9 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	8 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	8 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	6 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	4 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	4 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	4 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	4 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	4 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	4 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	4 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	4 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	4 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	4 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	4 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	4 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duty	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunctions	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patents	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mistake	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	3 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debt Restructuring	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
UNCITRAL Model Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice7% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction of Arbitral tribunal	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized94% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Professional Privilege	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional conduct	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Income taxation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Contracts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tax Avoidance	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Subrogation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loss of Chance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnerships	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legitimate expectations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Separate legal personality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indian Contract Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Crisis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Advice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Blackmail	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extortion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tortious Interference	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hotel Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Differential Premium Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Doctor's Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trustee's right of indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bribery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Case Disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit-linked notes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Good Faith	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring Expenses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rent Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Reverse Dutch Auction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Medical Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Overcharging of fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Founder's Benefits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Neurology	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement and Compromise	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Right of Set-Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Validity of arbitration agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building Industry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable subrogation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Non-circumvention agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sales Representative Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Account of Profits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contextual approach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Enterprises	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Domestic Violence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Services Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Healthcare Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Acquisition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent powers	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intention to create legal relations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of disclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint and Several Liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sham Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mareva Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Claim Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Invalidity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Specification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patent Revocation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investment Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stare Decisis	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Quistclose trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legitimate Expectation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Investor-State Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Acceptance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nominal damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Assignment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remoteness	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lis alibi pendens	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Scope of agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Double Separability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Procedural fraud	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting aside arbitral awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Thai Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Set-Off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employees’ Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Alvin Yeo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Alvin Yeo has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 59 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	59 cases	54% of cases	IIa Technologies v Element Six: Patent Invalidity & Infringement in CVD Diamond Production(Feb 2023) BTN v BTP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Earn Out Consideration Dispute(Nov 2021) CEF & CEG v CEH: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Exceeding Scope of Arbitration(May 2021)
Wong Partnership	29 cases	27% of cases	Asia Hotel Investments v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Lost Hotel Opportunity(Apr 2007) Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak: Costs in Withdrawn Enforcement Proceedings(Oct 2006) Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan: Setting Aside Ex Parte Order in Arbitration Enforcement(Aug 2006)
Wong Partnership LLP	16 cases	15% of cases	Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Wrongful Termination & Fraud in Singapore Arbitration Enforcement(Jan 2020) Sanum Investments v ST Group: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction(Jun 2018) Accent Delight v Bouvier: Forum Non Conveniens & Conflict of Laws(Mar 2016)
WongPartnership	3 cases	3% of cases	SetClear Pte Ltd v Ashlock William Grover: Enforceability of Termination Agreement and Anti-Suit Injunction(May 2011) Sin Yong v United Engineers: Illegality & Enforceability of Contracts Affected by Bribery(Mar 2008) Murakami v Wiryadi: Foreign Judgment Enforcement & Limitation in Estate Dispute(Aug 2007)
WongPartnership LLC	1 cases	1% of cases	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and Infringement(Feb 2020)
Wong Partership	1 cases	1% of cases	Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries: Pre-Action Discovery & Fraud(Jul 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alvin Yeo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.1
Complex Cases: 41 (38%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	1%
Lost	506.5 parties avg	6.5	46%
Neutral	63.0 parties avg	3.0	6%
Partial	124.9 parties avg	4.9	11%
Unknown	16.0 parties avg	6.0	1%
Won	398.4 parties avg	8.4	36%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	412.0 parties avg	12.0
2001	214.8 parties avg	14.8
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	711.8 parties avg	11.8
2004	39.0 parties avg	9.0
2005	74.3 parties avg	4.3
2006	52.8 parties avg	2.8
2007	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	77.7 parties avg	7.7
2009	33.8 parties avg	3.8
2010	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	82.4 parties avg	2.4
2012	64.8 parties avg	4.8
2013	74.5 parties avg	4.5
2014	63.6 parties avg	3.6
2015	84.7 parties avg	4.7
2016	87.5 parties avg	7.5
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2018	36.6 parties avg	6.6
2019	34.4 parties avg	4.4
2020	109.2 parties avg	9.2
2021	27.5 parties avg	7.5
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alvin Yeo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(1%)	1%
Lost	50(46%)	46%
Neutral	6(6%)	6%
Partial	12(11%)	11%
Unknown	1(1%)	1%
Won	39(36%)	36%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
CHF	9,500,000.00	9,500,000.001 cases	1
HKD	13,139,273.78	6,569,636.892 cases	2
SGD	127,217,016.00	2,271,732.4356 cases	56
USD	5,000,000.00	5,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	7 1123	Dismissed: 1 cases (14.3%) Lost: 1 cases (14.3%) Partial: 2 cases (28.6%) Won: 3 cases (42.9%)
2004	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2005	7 511	Lost: 5 cases (71.4%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 1 cases (14.3%)
2006	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 2 cases (40.0%)
2007	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	7 313	Lost: 3 cases (42.9%) Neutral: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 3 cases (42.9%)
2009	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%)
2011	8 314	Lost: 3 cases (37.5%) Neutral: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 4 cases (50.0%)
2012	6 2211	Lost: 2 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 2 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 1 cases (16.7%)
2013	7 313	Lost: 3 cases (42.9%) Partial: 1 cases (14.3%) Won: 3 cases (42.9%)
2014	6 114	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 4 cases (66.7%)
2015	8 5111	Lost: 5 cases (62.5%) Partial: 1 cases (12.5%) Unknown: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 1 cases (12.5%)
2016	8 314	Lost: 3 cases (37.5%) Partial: 1 cases (12.5%) Won: 4 cases (50.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2019	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	10 712	Lost: 7 cases (70.0%) Partial: 1 cases (10.0%) Won: 2 cases (20.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 109 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	IIa Technologies v Element Six: Patent Invalidity & Infringement in CVD Diamond Production 16 Feb 2023 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	16 Feb 2023	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Patent RevokedThe patent SG 872 was revoked due to insufficiency.
2	BTN v BTP: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Earn Out Consideration Dispute 29 Nov 2021 BTN (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Nov 2021	BTN (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.
3	CEF & CEG v CEH: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Exceeding Scope of Arbitration 18 May 2021 CEG (Plaintiff)Lost	18 May 2021	CEG (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside arbitral award dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	CBX v CBZ: Costs Dispute After Dismissal of Application to Set Aside Arbitration Awards 07 Oct 2020 CBX (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Oct 2020	CBX (Plaintiff): Costs to be paid to DefendantsPlaintiffs are to pay the Defendants’ costs of S$150,000 (all-in). Simple interest at 5.33% per annum is to run on the amount of S$150,000 from the date of this judgment until payment by the Plaintiffs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute 21 Jul 2020 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	21 Jul 2020	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffPlaintiff was awarded costs of the action on a standard basis. Costs for the costs hearing were ordered in favor of the Plaintiff and fixed at $3,000, including disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	CBX v CBZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Awards for Exceeding Jurisdiction and Public Policy 15 Jul 2020 CBX (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Jul 2020	CBX (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe Plaintiff's application to set aside parts of two Partial Awards and the whole of a Final Award was dismissed.
7	Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Singapore Arbitration Award on Wrongful Termination 28 May 2020 Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels Inc (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	28 May 2020	Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels Inc (Plaintiff, Respondent): Applications dismissedApplication to set aside the Final Award and resist enforcement of the Final Award were dismissed.
8	BBA v BAZ: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Alleged Misrepresentation in Pharmaceutical Stake Sale 27 May 2020 BBM (Appellant)Lost	27 May 2020	BBM (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $100,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid to BAZ. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Independent State of Papua New Guinea v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Contract Formation & Corporate Governance 29 Apr 2020 Independent State of Papua New Guinea (Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2020	Independent State of Papua New Guinea (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; appellant's claims not supported by evidence. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Baker v BCS: Oral Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Loan Dispute over Ethocyn Rights 28 Apr 2020 BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	28 Apr 2020	BCS Business Consulting Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe court dismissed the Defendant's arguments and found in favor of the Plaintiff.
11	Oei Hong Leong v Chew Hua Seng: Contract Formation, Intention, Breach & Damages 23 Feb 2020 Chew Hua Seng (Defendant)Won	23 Feb 2020	Chew Hua Seng (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Element Six Technologies Ltd v IIa Technologies Pte Ltd: CVD Diamond Patents, Validity, and Infringement 06 Feb 2020 Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	06 Feb 2020	Element Six Technologies Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partSG 872 found valid and infringed.
13	Bloomberry v Global Gaming: Wrongful Termination & Fraud in Singapore Arbitration Enforcement 02 Jan 2020 Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels Inc (Plaintiff)Lost	02 Jan 2020	Bloomberry Resorts and Hotels Inc (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to resist enforcement of the Partial Award is dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Re Gearing: Ad Hoc Admission for Investor-State Arbitration - Legal Profession Act 17 Oct 2019 State (Plaintiff)Won	17 Oct 2019	State (Plaintiff): Costs AwardedCosts of the application were awarded to the State, fixed at $6,000 inclusive of disbursements, to be paid by the Investor. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Independent State of Papua New Guinea v PNG Sustainable Development Program Ltd: Corporate Governance Dispute 01 Apr 2019 Independent State of Papua New Guinea (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Apr 2019	Independent State of Papua New Guinea (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe State's claim was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Thio Syn Pyn v Thio Syn Kym Wendy: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation 26 Mar 2019 Thio Syn Kym Wendy (Respondent)Won	26 Mar 2019	Thio Syn Kym Wendy (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; costs of $28,000 (all-in) were to be paid by each Appellant to the Respondents. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Thio Syn Kym Wendy v Thio Syn Pyn: Minority Oppression in Family-Owned Companies 07 Aug 2018 Thio Syn Kym Wendy (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	07 Aug 2018	Thio Syn Kym Wendy (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; entitled to a buyout order in respect of their shares in both MDI and THPL. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Sanum Investments v ST Group: Enforcement of Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction 17 Jun 2018 Sanum Investments Limited (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Jun 2018	Sanum Investments Limited (Plaintiff): Partial WinSummons dismissed against ST Group Co., Ltd., Sithat Xaysoulivong, and ST Vegas Co.
19	Harish Salve v BPW: Ad Hoc Admission for Foreign Counsel in ICC Arbitration Dispute 24 Jan 2018 Harish Salve (Appellant, Applicant)Won	24 Jan 2018	Harish Salve (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeals, reversing the High Court's decision to dismiss the applications for ad hoc admission.
20	Sit Kwong Lam v MCST Plan No 2645: Strata Titles, Common Property, By-Laws Dispute 26 Mar 2017 SIT KWONG LAM (Appellant)Lost	26 Mar 2017	SIT KWONG LAM (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Comptroller of Income Tax v ARW: Discovery, Legal Professional Privilege & Investigatory Audit 30 Jan 2017 Comptroller of Income Tax (Plaintiff)Neutral	30 Jan 2017	Comptroller of Income Tax (Plaintiff): Discovery OrderedDiscovery of documents in Groups 1, 2, and 3 ordered.
22	ARX v Comptroller of Income Tax: Legal Professional Privilege & In-House Counsel 29 Sep 2016 The Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2016	The Comptroller of Income Tax (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with modifications made to the order to elect.
23	Sanum Investments v. Government of Lao: Treaty Interpretation & Arbitration Jurisdiction 28 Sep 2016 Sanum Investments Limited (Appellant, Defendant)Won	28 Sep 2016	Sanum Investments Limited (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in CA 139/2015 and CA 167/2015Appeal allowed in CA 139/2015 and CA 167/2015. Costs of the High Court hearing and the appeal awarded to Sanum (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Ngee Ann Development v Takashimaya: Lease Renewal, Prevailing Market Rental Value & Contractual Interpretation 12 Sep 2016 Takashimaya Singapore Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 Sep 2016	Takashimaya Singapore Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantCourt declared that the 'prevailing market rental value' should be based on the existing configuration of the Demised Premises.
25	Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Equitable Compensation 08 Sep 2016 Lee Howe Yong (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	08 Sep 2016	Lee Howe Yong (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. Lee and Sia should be jointly and severally liable for the sum of HKD6,569,636.89 plus post-judgment pre-liquidation and post-liquidation interest in respect of the Commerzbank pledge.
26	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Corporate Governance 28 Jul 2016 Koh Oon Bin (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Jul 2016	Koh Oon Bin (Plaintiff): Shares to be purchased by defendantsThe court ordered the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs.
27	Eng Chiet Shoong v Cheong Soh Chin: Quantum Meruit & Implied Contracts Dispute 12 Jul 2016 Lee Siew Yuen Sylvia (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	12 Jul 2016	Lee Siew Yuen Sylvia (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe Engs are entitled to compensation for work done with regard to Project Plaza (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Maybank Kim Eng Securities v Lim Keng Yong: Stay of Court Proceedings & Arbitration 19 Apr 2016 Maybank Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	19 Apr 2016	Maybank Kim Eng Securities Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs fixed at $10,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
29	Accent Delight v Bouvier: Forum Non Conveniens & Conflict of Laws 16 Mar 2016 Xitrans Finance Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Mar 2016	Xitrans Finance Ltd (Plaintiff): Summonses dismissedSummonses filed by the defendants were dismissed. Costs of application to the plaintiffs to be taxed unless otherwise agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	AKN v ALC: Setting Aside Arbitral Award & Tribunal Jurisdiction 26 Nov 2015 ALE (Respondent)	26 Nov 2015	ALE (Respondent): -
31	AUF v AUG: Challenge to Arbitral Award on Defective External Wall System 25 Nov 2015 AUG (Defendant, Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	25 Nov 2015	AUG (Defendant, Plaintiff, Appellant): Applications dismissed with costsApplications to set aside arbitral award and ex parte order dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	Dynasty Line Ltd v Sukamto Sia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Director Liability 05 Nov 2015 Lee Howe Yong (Defendant)Lost	05 Nov 2015	Lee Howe Yong (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against Lee for HK$6,569,636.89 jointly and severally with Sia for the Commerzbank Pledge, plus pre-liquidation interest of 5% per annum over four years. Post-liquidation interest will only be claimable if Dynasty has a surplus of assets after paying all claims in its liquidation. Assumed HKD as the case was heard in relation to CDC shares, a company listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.
33	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Private Equity Investments & Accounting 09 Jul 2015 C S Partners Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	09 Jul 2015	C S Partners Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed except for agreed management fees.
34	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Undue Influence, and Appointment of Deputies 18 May 2015 Re BKR (Respondent)Lost	18 May 2015	Re BKR (Respondent): Finding of Lack of CapacityCourt found that BKR lacked the capacity to make decisions regarding her property and affairs due to a combination of mental impairment and undue influence.
35	PwC v Celestial Nutrifoods: Appeal on Liquidator's Information Powers Under Section 285 07 Apr 2015 PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Appellant)Lost	07 Apr 2015	PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal and previous stay applications fixed at $60,000 plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
36	AKN v ALC: Arbitration Award Set Aside for Breach of Natural Justice and Excess of Jurisdiction 30 Mar 2015 Liquidator (Respondent)Partial	30 Mar 2015	Liquidator (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, with portions of the award set aside.
37	Koh Kim Teck v Credit Suisse: Breach of Duty in Investment Advice Claim 25 Feb 2015 Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	25 Feb 2015	Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe Defendant's appeal to strike out the Plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
38	SH Cogent Logistics v Singapore Agro: Conspiracy to Injure & Reinstatement Dispute 14 Oct 2014 SH Cogent Logistics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Oct 2014	SH Cogent Logistics Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff for damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
39	AKM v AKN: Setting Aside SIAC Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Jurisdictional Excess 30 Jul 2014 AKM (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jul 2014	AKM (Plaintiff): Applications AllowedApplication to set aside the arbitration award was allowed.
40	ADP v ADT: Executors' Duties and Interim Distribution of Estate Assets Amid Mental Capacity Dispute 29 May 2014 ADT and others (Defendant)Neutral	29 May 2014	ADT and others (Defendant): NeutralThe court made no order in respect of the originating summons.
41	Ting Siew May v Boon Lay Choo: Enforceability of Backdated Option to Purchase & Illegality 25 May 2014 Ting Siew May (Appellant)Won	25 May 2014	Ting Siew May (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed with costs and consequential orders.
42	ADG v ADI: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Failure to Present Case & Breach of Natural Justice 14 Apr 2014 ADG (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Apr 2014	ADG (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
43	KS Energy v BR Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement & Endeavours Clauses 25 Feb 2014 KS Energy Services Ltd (Appellant)Won	25 Feb 2014	KS Energy Services Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; KSE was not in breach of contract. No damages awarded. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
44	EFT Holdings v Marinteknik: Conspiracy by Unlawful Means, Mental Element, Pleading & Proof of Foreign Law 28 Nov 2013 EFT Holdings, Inc (Appellant)Lost	28 Nov 2013	EFT Holdings, Inc (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found no conspiracy by unlawful means.
45	Chiu Teng v SLA: Judicial Review of Differential Premium Assessment for Lifting Title Restrictions 26 Nov 2013 Chiu Teng @ Kallang Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	26 Nov 2013	Chiu Teng @ Kallang Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed; applicant to pay costs of the SLA and Attorney-General (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
46	Re BKR: Mental Capacity Act Application, Appointment of Deputies, Undue Influence 30 Sep 2013 BKR (Appellant, Defendant)Won	30 Sep 2013	BKR (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; original decision set aside; costs reversed in appellant's favor (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
47	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Priority of Unsecured Trust Creditors and Trust Beneficiary Claims 18 Jul 2013 Thomas Chan (Intervener)Partial	18 Jul 2013	Thomas Chan (Intervener): Entitled to subrogation and share pari passuThomas Chan is entitled to step into the shoes of Ridout by way of subrogation and claim the indemnity that Ridout possesses against the trust property and share pari passu.
48	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct and Ethical Obligations of Medical Practitioners 27 Jun 2013 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	27 Jun 2013	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Decision UpheldThe Disciplinary Committee's decision to suspend the appellant was upheld.
49	Morgan Stanley v Hong Leong Finance: Anti-Suit Injunction & Pinnacle Notes Failure 18 Apr 2013 Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte (formerly known as Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asia (Singapore) Pte) (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Apr 2013	Morgan Stanley Asia (Singapore) Pte (formerly known as Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asia (Singapore) Pte) (Plaintiff): Application RefusedThe plaintiffs' application for an anti-suit injunction was refused, and they were ordered to pay costs of $35,000 plus reasonable disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
50	Chng Bee Kheng v Chng Eng Chye: Trust Deed Validity & Beneficial Ownership Dispute 25 Feb 2013 Chng Bee Kheng (Plaintiff)Won	25 Feb 2013	Chng Bee Kheng (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiffs' claim allowed; costs of the Plaintiffs are to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
51	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Breach of Directors' Duties & Conspiracy 30 Oct 2012 Lim Eng Hock Peter (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant)Partial	30 Oct 2012	Lim Eng Hock Peter (Respondent, Defendant, Appellant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartPeter Lim's claim of conspiracy against Margaret Tung and Lin Jian Wei was partially allowed.
52	Royal Bank of Scotland v TT International: Duty to Disclose Value-Added Fee in Scheme of Arrangement 26 Sep 2012 TT International Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	26 Sep 2012	TT International Ltd (Respondent): Order to negotiate feesThe Court directed the parties to reach an agreement on the appropriate amount of professional fees for the scheme manager; otherwise, the fees will be assessed by a High Court Judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
53	HSBC v Toshin: Good Faith, Rent Review, and Valuer Independence 26 Aug 2012 HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd (trustee of Starhill Global Real Estate Investment Trust) (Appellant)Lost	26 Aug 2012	HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Singapore) Ltd (trustee of Starhill Global Real Estate Investment Trust) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; each party to bear its own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
54	Sembcorp Marine v PPL Holdings: Joint Venture Dispute over Share Transfer and Contractual Obligations 29 May 2012 PPL Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	29 May 2012	PPL Shipyard Pte Ltd (Defendant): NeutralPPL Shipyard's participation in the proceedings was essentially confined to that of holding a watching brief on the developments.
55	Ashlock William Grover v SetClear Pte Ltd: Anti-Suit Injunction & Contract Interpretation 18 Mar 2012 SetClear Inc (Respondent)Won	18 Mar 2012	SetClear Inc (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentJudgment for the Respondent; appeal dismissed with costs.
56	RBS v TT International: Scheme of Arrangement - Creditor Classification, Voting Rights, Scheme Manager Duties 30 Jan 2012 TT International Ltd (Respondent)Lost	30 Jan 2012	TT International Ltd (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeals allowed; the court set aside the sanction of the Scheme and ordered Further Meetings to be called for the same Scheme to be put to a re-vote, subject to the directions as explained above.
57	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Disciplinary Proceedings & Bias 29 Nov 2011 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2011	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
58	EC Investment v Ridout Residence: Specific Performance & Property Sale Dispute 27 Sep 2011 Thomas Chan Ho Lam (Respondent)Neutral	27 Sep 2011	Thomas Chan Ho Lam (Respondent): NeutralCited as having been granted an option to purchase the property. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
59	LW Infrastructure v Lim Chin San: Liquidated Damages & Sub-Contract Termination 04 Jul 2011 Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	04 Jul 2011	Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed on the first and second questions of law. The Award was remitted to the Arbitrator for reconsideration.
60	Lim Chin San Contractors v LW Infrastructure: Appeal on Extension of Time and Termination in Construction Sub-Contract 04 Jul 2011 Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	04 Jul 2011	Lim Chin San Contractors Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
61	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Revocation 25 May 2011 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	25 May 2011	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Discovery application dismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's discovery application.
62	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Committee Appointment 25 May 2011 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Won	25 May 2011	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Application DismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's application for judicial review.
63	Lim Mey Lee Susan v Singapore Medical Council: Application for Quashing and Prohibiting Orders 25 May 2011 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	25 May 2011	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Leave GrantedLeave granted to the applicant to apply for a Quashing Order and a Prohibiting Order.
64	SetClear Pte Ltd v Ashlock William Grover: Enforceability of Termination Agreement and Anti-Suit Injunction 23 May 2011 SetClear Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	23 May 2011	SetClear Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; costs awarded in the amount of $15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
65	Zain Asif Fancy v Soon Chia Chuen: Option to Purchase Dispute & Specific Performance 18 Oct 2010 Zain Asif Fancy (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Oct 2010	Zain Asif Fancy (Plaintiff): Application dismissedPlaintiff's application for specific performance and other remedies was dismissed, and the plaintiff was ordered to pay costs of $5000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
66	Lim Eng Hock Peter v Lin Jian Wei: Defamation Damages for Business Mismanagement 27 Jul 2010 Lim Eng Hock Peter (Appellant)Partial	27 Jul 2010	Lim Eng Hock Peter (Appellant): Appeal dismissed; damages awardedAppeal dismissed; damages awarded in the amount of $210,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
67	Over & Over Ltd v Bonvests Holdings: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Rights Issue Dispute 23 Feb 2010 Bonvests Holdings Ltd (Respondent)Lost	23 Feb 2010	Bonvests Holdings Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Bonvests must allow O&O to realize the value of its shares at a fair value. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
68	Gobinathan Devathasan v Singapore Medical Council: Professional Misconduct & Therapeutic Ultrasound 09 Feb 2010 Singapore Medical Council (Respondent)Lost	09 Feb 2010	Singapore Medical Council (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe High Court allowed the appeal, overturning the Disciplinary Committee's decision.
69	Lim Eng Hock Peter v Lin Jian Wei: Defamation & Qualified Privilege 07 Oct 2009 Lim Eng Hock Peter (Appellant)Won	07 Oct 2009	Lim Eng Hock Peter (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; judgment for the Appellant for damages and costs. Damages awarded on an aggravated basis. Costs awarded on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
70	Insigma v Alstom: Validity of Arbitration Agreement & Institutional Rules 01 Jun 2009 Alstom Technology Ltd (Respondent)Won	01 Jun 2009	Alstom Technology Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed in Alstom's favour. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
71	Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute 25 May 2009 Chesney Real Estate Group LLP (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	25 May 2009	Chesney Real Estate Group LLP (Defendant, Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Chesney Real Estate Group LLP against Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd for $8,284,000.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
72	NCC International AB v Land Transport Authority: SIAC Rules & Arbitrator Appointment 27 Oct 2008 Land Transport Authority of Singapore (Defendant)Won	27 Oct 2008	Land Transport Authority of Singapore (Defendant): WonOriginating summons dismissed; costs reserved to the arbitrator in the arbitration proceedings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
73	CIMB Bank v Dresdner Kleinwort: Forum Non Conveniens & Choice of Law in Restitution Claim 07 Aug 2008 CIMB Bank Bhd (Appellant)Lost	07 Aug 2008	CIMB Bank Bhd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedCIMB's appeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
74	Lim Eng Hock Peter v Lin Jian Wei: Defamation Claim & Striking Out Application 08 Jul 2008 Lim Eng Hock Peter (Plaintiff)Neutral	08 Jul 2008	Lim Eng Hock Peter (Plaintiff): Application to strike out dismissedThe plaintiff successfully opposed the defendants' application to strike out the defamation action.
75	Dongwoo Mann+Hummel v Mann+Hummel: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Breach of Natural Justice 07 May 2008 Dongwoo Mann+Hummel Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 May 2008	Dongwoo Mann+Hummel Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Action dismissedDongwoo's action to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed.
76	Petroval SA v Stainby Overseas Ltd: Mareva Injunctions & Court Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Fraud 01 May 2008 Fiortino Investments Limited (Defendant)Won	01 May 2008	Fiortino Investments Limited (Defendant): Interlocutory relief set asideThe court set aside the interlocutory relief sought by the plaintiff against the defendant.
77	Dresdner Kleinwort v CIMB Bank: Stay of Proceedings & Forum Non Conveniens 13 Apr 2008 CIMB Bank Bhd (Defendant)Lost	13 Apr 2008	CIMB Bank Bhd (Defendant): Permanent stay application dismissedDefendant's application for a permanent stay of proceedings was dismissed.
78	Sin Yong v United Engineers: Illegality & Enforceability of Contracts Affected by Bribery 24 Mar 2008 Sin Yong Contractor Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	24 Mar 2008	Sin Yong Contractor Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the Senior Assistant Registrar's order. The court found that the case warranted a full trial.
79	Murakami v Wiryadi: Foreign Judgment Enforcement & Limitation in Estate Dispute 29 Aug 2007 Murakami Takako (Appellant)Lost	29 Aug 2007	Murakami Takako (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
80	Asia Hotel Investments v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Lost Hotel Opportunity 09 Apr 2007 Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	09 Apr 2007	Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffAwarded THB110,839,006 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) plus interest.
81	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak: Costs in Withdrawn Enforcement Proceedings 24 Oct 2006 Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Applicant)Partial	24 Oct 2006	Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Applicant): Partial Costs Awarded AgainstThe applicant is to pay the respondent's costs after 30 March 2006. Each party is to bear its own costs from the commencement of proceedings until 30 March 2006. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
82	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Perusahaan Pertambangan: Setting Aside Ex Parte Order in Arbitration Enforcement 17 Aug 2006 Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Applicant)Won	17 Aug 2006	Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Applicant): Application grantedThe court set aside the ex parte order on the oral application made by the applicant.
83	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Pertamina Energy Trading: Contempt of Court & Mareva Injunction 18 Jun 2006 Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	18 Jun 2006	Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for contempt of court dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
84	GYC Financial Planning v Prudential: Oral Contract Breach & CMA Termination 27 Apr 2006 Goh Yang Chye (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Apr 2006	Goh Yang Chye (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe claim for breach of the oral agreement was dismissed.
85	CS Bored Pile System v Evan Lim: Formation of Contract & Acceptance in Construction Subcontract 19 Jan 2006 CS Bored Pile System Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Jan 2006	CS Bored Pile System Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
86	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Chor Pee & Partners: Legal Fee Agreement Dispute 05 Dec 2005 Chor Pee & Partners (Respondent)Lost	05 Dec 2005	Chor Pee & Partners (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the court found that an agreement existed for a lump sum fee. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
87	Karaha Bodas Co LLC v Pertamina Energy Trading Ltd: Amendment of Pleadings & Mareva Injunctions 11 Oct 2005 Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Appellant)Lost	11 Oct 2005	Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed due to lack of locus standi to seek declaratory relief and Mareva injunction.
88	United Overseas Bank v Bank of China: Estoppel & Subrogation in Mortgage Dispute 27 Sep 2005 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Appellant)Lost	27 Sep 2005	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
89	PP v Juminem: Diminished Responsibility & Provocation in Maid's Murder Case 04 Sep 2005 Siti Aminah (Defendant)Partial	04 Sep 2005	Siti Aminah (Defendant): PartialFound not guilty of murder but guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
90	Bank of China v Yong Tze: Estoppel & Subrogation in Mortgage Dispute 13 Apr 2005 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	13 Apr 2005	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed.
91	Karaha Bodas v Pertamina: Setting Aside Mareva Injunction & Service Out of Jurisdiction 21 Mar 2005 Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Mar 2005	Karaha Bodas Co LLC (Plaintiff): Application DismissedThe plaintiff's application for a Mareva injunction and service out of jurisdiction was dismissed.
92	Harrisson v Jones: Tanglin Club Voting Dispute over Capital Expenditure 06 Mar 2005 Petrie Christopher Harrisson (Plaintiff)Won	06 Mar 2005	Petrie Christopher Harrisson (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; Resolutions 1A and 1B are invalid and of no effect.
93	Asia Hotel v Starwood: Breach of Contract & Loss of Chance in Hotel Share Acquisition 19 Sep 2004 Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	19 Sep 2004	Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; damages for loss of chance to acquire Lai Sun stake to be assessed. Costs of appeal and trial awarded to Asia Hotel (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
94	Bayerische Hypo- und Vereinsbank AG v Asia Pacific Breweries: Pre-Action Discovery & Fraud 27 Jul 2004 Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	27 Jul 2004	Bayerische Hypo-und Vereinsbank AG (Applicant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the order for pre-action discovery was allowed, resulting in the dismissal of the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
95	Koh Keow Neo v Chee Johnny: Privatisation of HUDC Estate Dispute 05 May 2004 Chee Johnny (Defendant)Won	05 May 2004	Chee Johnny (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
96	Asia Hotel v Starwood: Breach of Non-Circumvention Agreement & Loss of Chance in Hotel Acquisition 26 Nov 2003 Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Nov 2003	Asia Hotel Investments Ltd (Plaintiff): Nominal damages awardedNominal damages of $10 awarded. The currency is assumed to be Singapore Dollars (SGD) as the judgment originates from Singapore.
97	Re Econ Corp Ltd: Scheme of Arrangement Approval Dispute 23 Nov 2003 Jurong Readymix Concrete Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Nov 2003	Jurong Readymix Concrete Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for sanction of the scheme of arrangement was dismissed.
98	Pacific Rim Palm Oil v PT Asiatic Persada: Breach of Loan Agreement & Quistclose Trust 16 Oct 2003 Pacific Rim Palm Oil Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	16 Oct 2003	Pacific Rim Palm Oil Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe court declared that the US$5 million in the Citibank account is held on trust for the Plaintiffs and ordered the 2nd and 3rd Defendants to pay the US$5 million to the Plaintiffs. Interest at 6% per annum was also awarded from the date of the writ of summons until the date of payment.
99	Cain Sales v Beyonics: Commission Dispute over Seagate Contract Manufacturing 27 Jul 2003 Beyonics Technology Limited (Defendant)Won	27 Jul 2003	Beyonics Technology Limited (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
100	Shepherd Andrew v BIL International Ltd: Employment Contract, Severance Payments & Right of Set-Off 07 Jul 2003 Shepherd Andrew (Plaintiff)Dismissed	07 Jul 2003	Shepherd Andrew (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for severance payments and bonus was dismissed.
101	ABC Co v XYZ Co Ltd: Setting Aside Interim Arbitral Award - Amending Originating Motion 07 May 2003 XYZ Co Ltd (Respondent)Partial	07 May 2003	XYZ Co Ltd (Respondent): Application to amend originating motion partially dismissedThe application to amend the originating motion was partially dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
102	Deutsche Bank v Asia Pulp & Paper: Judicial Management Order Dispute 28 Apr 2003 Deutsche Bank AG (Appellant)Lost	28 Apr 2003	Deutsche Bank AG (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
103	Deutsche Bank v Asia Pulp & Paper: Judicial Management Order Dispute 30 Oct 2002 Deutsche Bank AG (Petitioner)Lost	30 Oct 2002	Deutsche Bank AG (Petitioner): Petition dismissedThe petition for a judicial management order was dismissed.
104	Tan Cheong Leong v Lim Chun Chuan: Trust, Joint Accounts & Directors' Duties 23 Sep 2001 Hiap Lee (Cheong Leong & Sons) Brickmakers Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	23 Sep 2001	Hiap Lee (Cheong Leong & Sons) Brickmakers Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Application to amend Statement of Claim was dismissed.Application by the 15th, 16th and 17th defendants to amend their Statement of Claim was dismissed.
105	AMS Securities v Thio Gwan Choon: Stockbroking Losses & CEO Liability 22 Feb 2001 AMS Securities (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Feb 2001	AMS Securities (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against the defendant was dismissed.
106	Tan Poh Leng Stanley v Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey: Arbitrator's Power to Reverse Final Award 29 Nov 2000 Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey (Respondent)Lost	29 Nov 2000	Tang Boon Jek Jeffrey (Respondent): Motion dismissedThe respondent's contention that the motion was filed out of time was dismissed. The respondent shall pay the costs of the applicant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
107	Low Hua Kin v Kumagai-Zenecon: Director's Breach of Duty & Provisional Liquidator's Sale of Shares 27 Jul 2000 Low Hua Kin (Appellant)Lost	27 Jul 2000	Low Hua Kin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
108	Lum Chang v Anderson Land: Challenging Arbitration Award Under Section 22 of the Arbitration Act 04 Apr 2000 Anderson Land Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	04 Apr 2000	Anderson Land Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of Anderson Land Pte Ltd.
109	Chau Kwok Fun Kevin v Etons Management: Rectification of Settlement Agreement 06 Mar 2000 Chan Kung Git (Defendant)Won	06 Mar 2000	Chan Kung Git (Defendant): Application for Rectification AllowedThe application of the 4th to 13th Defendants to rectify the agreement was allowed.