DBS Bank v Ong Yew Huat: Scope of Charge over Fixed Deposit for Overdraft Facility

In The Development Bank of Singapore Limited v Ong Yew Huat and Others, the Court of Appeal of Singapore heard an appeal regarding the scope of a charge over a fixed deposit account. The Development Bank of Singapore Limited (DBS) appealed a decision regarding a charge over a fixed deposit account maintained by Tararone Investments Pte Ltd (Tararone) to secure an overdraft facility granted to Sogo Department Stores (S) Pte Ltd (Sogo). The court allowed the appeal, declaring that the charge secured further facilities extended by DBS to Sogo after the initial overdraft facility was terminated, entitling DBS to recover the outstanding amount from Tararone's fixed deposit.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

Court of Appeal

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Allowed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

The Court of Appeal addressed whether a charge over a fixed deposit secured liabilities beyond the initial overdraft facility. The court held that the charge covered all debts from any account owed by Sogo to DBS.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
The Development Bank of Singapore LimitedAppellantCorporationAppeal AllowedWonLeslie Chew, Chan Kia Pheng
Ong Yew HuatRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedLostRonald Choo, Chio Yuen-Lyn
Nagaraj SivaramRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedLostRonald Choo, Chio Yuen-Lyn
Fang (nee Ho) Ai LianRespondentIndividualAppeal DismissedLostRonald Choo, Chio Yuen-Lyn
The Judicial Managers of Tararone Investments Pte Ltd jointly and severallyRespondentCorporationAppeal DismissedLostRonald Choo, Chio Yuen-Lyn

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Chao Hick TinJudge of AppealYes
L P TheanJudge of AppealNo
Yong Pung HowChief JusticeNo

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Leslie ChewKhattar Wong & Partners
Chan Kia PhengKhattar Wong & Partners
Ronald ChooRajah & Tann
Chio Yuen-LynRajah & Tann

4. Facts

  1. Sogo was indebted to DBS for $18 million in an overdraft account.
  2. DBS agreed to continue the overdraft facility subject to a repayment schedule and security.
  3. Tararone executed a charge over a $18 million fixed deposit to secure Sogo's facilities.
  4. Sogo made payments, and Tararone made corresponding withdrawals from the fixed deposit.
  5. DBS terminated the overdraft facility due to Sogo's financial difficulties.
  6. DBS honored certain cheques after termination, provided the total outstanding did not exceed the security held.
  7. Sogo and Tararone were placed under interim judicial management.

5. Formal Citations

  1. The Development Bank of Singapore Limited v Ong Yew Huat and Others, CA 600022/2001, [2001] SGCA 58

6. Timeline

DateEvent
DBS informed Sogo of overdraft facility terms.
Tararone executed a charge in respect of a $18 million fixed deposit.
DBS terminated Sogo's overdraft facility.
DBS notified Tararone of Sogo's overdraft facility termination.
Sogo protested DBS's decision to terminate the overdraft facility.
DBS agreed to honor specific cheques drawn on the loan accounts.
Sogo and Tararone placed under interim judicial management.
Interim judicial managers instructed DBS to close all of Sogo's accounts.
A sum of $46,889.54 was deducted from the overdraft facility.
A judicial management order was made against Tararone.
Sogo owed $2,878.586.28 in the overdraft account.
DBS sought consent to enforce the charge on the fixed deposit.
Interim judicial managers explained they had to consider questions before replying.
Originating summons was filed.
Judgment delivered by Court of Appeal.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Scope of Charge
    • Outcome: The court held that the charge was an 'all money' charge, securing all debts from any account owed by Sogo to DBS, including those incurred after the termination of the initial overdraft facility.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Interpretation of 'all moneys' clause
      • Effect of termination of overdraft facility on charge
  2. Estoppel
    • Outcome: The court held that the elements of estoppel were not satisfied, as the letter of termination did not constitute a clear and unambiguous representation, and there was no evidence of reliance or detriment.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Sub-Issues:
      • Representation by conduct
      • Reliance and detriment

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Declaration
  2. Recovery of Debt

9. Cause of Actions

  • Enforcement of Charge
  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Banking Litigation

11. Industries

  • Banking
  • Retail

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Bank of India v Trans Continental Commodity Merchants' Ltd & PatelEnglish Court of AppealYes[1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 298England and WalesCited for the purposive and practical approach taken by the court in relation to a wide "all money" clause in a guarantee given to a bank.
Re Rudd & Son LtdEnglish Court of AppealYes(1986) 2 BCC 98,955England and WalesCited to gauge judicial attitudes in relation to such "all money" clauses and the court's consideration of commercial sense in arriving at its decisions.
Estoril Investments Pty Ltd v Westpac Banking CorporationAustralian CourtYes(1993) 6 BPR 13,146AustraliaCited by counsel for Tararone to contend that the present charge should sensibly be read down to circumscribe its application.
Habibullah Mohamed Yousuff v Indian BankCourt of AppealYes[1999] 3 SLR 650SingaporeCited by Tararone to support the argument that a bank must disclose to a surety "unusual features" relating to a transaction.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
Companies ActSingapore

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Charge
  • Fixed Deposit
  • Overdraft Facility
  • All Moneys Charge
  • Banking Facilities
  • Repayment Schedule
  • Termination
  • Judicial Management
  • Continuing Security

15.2 Keywords

  • charge
  • fixed deposit
  • overdraft
  • banking facilities
  • security
  • DBS
  • Sogo
  • Tararone

16. Subjects

  • Banking
  • Finance
  • Security

17. Areas of Law

  • Banking Law
  • Contract Law
  • Security Law
  • Construction Law