Windsor Holdings Pte Ltd: Winding Up Petition for Inability to Pay Debts

Overseas Chinese Banking Corp (OCBC) petitioned the High Court of Singapore to wind up Windsor Nursing Holdings Pte Ltd due to its inability to pay debts arising from two loan facilities. The company, represented by Loo Choon Beng and Chay Kwok Kee, directors holding 57% of the shares, argued that OCBC should exhaust its mortgage on a property valued above $6 million and that the 1997 facility was illegal. The court, presided over by Justice Choo Han Teck, found the company unable to secure fresh financing despite its assets and granted the winding-up petition.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Petition granted.

1.3 Case Type

Insolvency

1.4 Judgment Type

Judgment

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

OCBC petitioned to wind up Windsor Holdings for inability to pay debts. The court granted the petition, finding the company unable to secure financing despite having assets.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Overseas Chinese Banking CorpPetitionerCorporationPetition grantedWon
Windsor Nursing Holdings Pte LtdRespondentCorporationWinding up order grantedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. Overseas Chinese Banking Corp petitioned to wind up Windsor Nursing Holdings Pte Ltd.
  2. The company owed debt arising from two facilities granted by the petitioners.
  3. The 1995 facility comprised an overdraft of $2m and a term loan of $1.5m.
  4. The 1997 facility comprised an overdraft of $1.5m and a term loan of $500,000.
  5. The petitioners terminated the overdraft facility and demanded payment.
  6. The company was unable to raise fresh financing despite having security worth $5.7m.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Re Windsor Holdings Pte Ltd, CWU 303/2000, [2001] SGHC 22

6. Timeline

DateEvent
1995 facility granted
1997 facility granted
Overdraft facility activated
Term loan disbursed
Overdraft facility terminated
Event of default declared
Company's solicitors asked for indulgence
Petitioners granted extension of time
Valuation report by Colliers Jardine
Statutory demand issued
Company's solicitors stated 'in principle' approval for new loan
Petition filed
Company's solicitors stated financing obtained from two banks
Petition heard
Hearing resumed
Decision Date

7. Legal Issues

  1. Inability to Pay Debts
    • Outcome: The court found the company unable to pay its debts and granted the winding-up petition.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Winding Up Order

9. Cause of Actions

  • Winding Up

10. Practice Areas

  • Insolvency
  • Commercial Litigation

11. Industries

  • Banking
  • Healthcare

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Cornhill Insurance v Improvement ServicesN/AYes[1986] 1 WLR 114N/ACited for the principle that companies who do not pay their debts have only themselves to blame if it is thought that they cannot pay them.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Winding up
  • Inability to pay debts
  • Statutory demand
  • Overdraft facility
  • Term loan
  • Personal guarantees

15.2 Keywords

  • Winding up
  • Insolvency
  • Debts
  • Petition
  • Banking
  • Singapore

17. Areas of Law

Area NameRelevance Score
Winding Up95
Company Law60
Bankruptcy30
Contract Law20

16. Subjects

  • Insolvency
  • Winding Up
  • Banking