Hri Kumar

Hri Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 75 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in defamation and bankruptcy. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 25 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hri Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 166 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	51 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 51 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	20 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 20 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	19 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	19 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 19 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	17 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	16 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defamation	14 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	11 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	11 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	10 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	10 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	10 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	9 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	8 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	8 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	7 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice16% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rescission	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Caveats	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Customer-Banker Relationship	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Standby letters of credit	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tag-along Rights	2 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interim injunctions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity and limitation of actions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Kompetenz-Kompetenz	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fixtures	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Voluntary Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Land Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment of Patents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Functus Officio	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Discharge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Libel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Documentary Credits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreign Exchange Transactions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Defamation Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Financial Investment Advice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Restructuring	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banker's Books	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security Memorandum	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
McKenzie Friend	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bank Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director Disqualification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Advice Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Security Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgagee in Possession	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forbearance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Want of Prosecution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Economic Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lending and security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Right of first refusal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formalities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Service Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stockbroking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
SWIFT message	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warrants	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Lodgment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Securities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hri Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Hri Kumar has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 36 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	36 cases	48% of cases	Ching Chew Weng Paul v Ching Pui Sim: Setting Aside Judgment for Fraud in Trust Asset Recovery(Mar 2011) Lee Chang-Rung v Standard Chartered Bank: Striking Out for Failure to Disclose Investment Experience(Sep 2010) Merrill Lynch v Harjani: Tort of Deceit & Contract Breach over Indonesian Shares(Aug 2010)
Drew and Napier LLC	18 cases	24% of cases	UBS AG v Telesto Investments: Forum Non Conveniens, Anti-Suit Injunction, Contractual Obligations(Jul 2011) Riduan bin Yusof v Khng Thian Huat: Tenant's Obligations & Fixtures Removal After Tenancy Termination(Aug 2005) OCBC v Infocommcentre: Overdraft Facility Recall & Misrepresentation in Compromise Agreements(Jul 2005)
Drew & Napier	18 cases	24% of cases	De Lacy Richard QC: Ad Hoc Admission & Costs in Legal Profession Act Application(Mar 2003) Wee v UBS AG: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel Denied(Nov 2002) Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel(Jan 2002)
Cheo Yeoh & Associates LLC	1 cases	1% of cases	Goh Eng Wah v Daikin Industries: Incentive Scheme Dispute & Contractual Obligations(Oct 2008)
Godwin Campos LLC	1 cases	1% of cases	Kikla v Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction(Feb 2013)
Drew and Napier	1 cases	1% of cases	Mak Chik Lun v Loh Kim Her: Enforceability of Deed of Settlement under Moneylenders Act(Sep 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hri Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.2
Complex Cases: 25 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	73.7 parties avg	3.7	9%
Neutral	96.4 parties avg	6.4	12%
Other	12.0 parties avg	2.0	1%
Partial	73.6 parties avg	3.6	9%
Unknown	34.3 parties avg	4.3	4%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	1%
Won	485.4 parties avg	5.4	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	62.7 parties avg	2.7
2001	154.2 parties avg	4.2
2002	113.7 parties avg	3.7
2003	93.6 parties avg	3.6
2004	94.3 parties avg	4.3
2005	62.8 parties avg	2.8
2006	53.4 parties avg	3.4
2007	512.1 parties avg	12.1
2008	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hri Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(9%)	9%
Neutral	9(12%)	12%
Other	1(1%)	1%
Partial	7(9%)	9%
Unknown	3(4%)	4%
Withdrawn	1(1%)	1%
Won	48(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	129,537,373.30	3,159,448.1341 cases	41
USD	10,462,687.18	5,231,343.592 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	6 114	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 4 cases (66.7%)
2001	16 231118	Lost: 2 cases (12.5%) Neutral: 3 cases (18.8%) Other: 1 cases (6.3%) Partial: 1 cases (6.3%) Unknown: 1 cases (6.3%) Won: 8 cases (50.0%)
2002	11 1316	Lost: 1 cases (9.1%) Neutral: 3 cases (27.3%) Unknown: 1 cases (9.1%) Won: 6 cases (54.5%)
2003	9 117	Lost: 1 cases (11.1%) Unknown: 1 cases (11.1%) Won: 7 cases (77.8%)
2004	9 27	Partial: 2 cases (22.2%) Won: 7 cases (77.8%)
2005	6 114	Lost: 1 cases (16.7%) Neutral: 1 cases (16.7%) Won: 4 cases (66.7%)
2006	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2007	5 113	Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)
2008	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2009	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 75 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kikla v Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corp: Forum Non Conveniens & Service Out of Jurisdiction 18 Feb 2013 Dinesh Kishin Kikla (as Administrator of the Estate of Lalitha Kishin Kikla also known as Lalita Kishin Kikla, Deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	18 Feb 2013	Dinesh Kishin Kikla (as Administrator of the Estate of Lalitha Kishin Kikla also known as Lalita Kishin Kikla, Deceased) (Plaintiff): Application by defendants dismissedThe defendants' applications for a stay of proceedings and to set aside the order for service out of jurisdiction were dismissed.
2	UBS AG v Telesto Investments: Forum Non Conveniens, Anti-Suit Injunction, Contractual Obligations 13 Jul 2011 UBS AG (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	13 Jul 2011	UBS AG (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the stay applications was dismissed. Appeal against the anti-suit injunction was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ching Chew Weng Paul v Ching Pui Sim: Setting Aside Judgment for Fraud in Trust Asset Recovery 27 Mar 2011 Ching Chew Weng Paul, deceased (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Mar 2011	Ching Chew Weng Paul, deceased (Plaintiff): Applications dismissed with costsThe applications to set aside the judgment were dismissed with costs of $40,000 excluding disbursements.
4	Lee Chang-Rung v Standard Chartered Bank: Striking Out for Failure to Disclose Investment Experience 16 Sep 2010 Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant, Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2010	Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; plaintiffs to pay the defendant’s costs of the appeal, such costs to be taxed or agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Merrill Lynch v Harjani: Tort of Deceit & Contract Breach over Indonesian Shares 25 Aug 2010 Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc (Plaintiff)Won	25 Aug 2010	Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of US$9,437,687.18, reduced by any amounts received by the plaintiff due to the disposal of the PT Colorpak shares. Interest awarded at 5.33% per annum on the purchase price of US$14,318,301.84 from 26 June 2008.
6	Abedeen Abdulkader Tyebally v Tyebally Akhtarhusein Hatim: Dispute over Ownership of Reliance Industries Shares 02 Apr 2009 Abedeen Abdulkader Tyebally (Plaintiff)Neutral	02 Apr 2009	Abedeen Abdulkader Tyebally (Plaintiff): Application converted to writ actionApplication converted to writ action.
7	Goh Eng Wah v Daikin Industries: Incentive Scheme Dispute & Contractual Obligations 30 Oct 2008 Goh Eng Wah (Plaintiff)Partial	30 Oct 2008	Goh Eng Wah (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim allowed against the third defendant (Robert Chua Teck Chew) for breach of the terms of the Incentive Scheme. Monetary amount is in Singapore Dollars, the currency of the jurisdiction.
8	CIMB Bank v Dresdner Kleinwort: Forum Non Conveniens & Choice of Law in Restitution Claim 07 Aug 2008 Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Aug 2008	Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against Dresdner's action was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Dresdner Kleinwort v CIMB Bank: Stay of Proceedings & Forum Non Conveniens 13 Apr 2008 Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Apr 2008	Dresdner Kleinwort Ltd (Plaintiff): Temporary stay granted with variationTemporary stay granted with variation to allow the defendant to proceed with third party actions.
10	Reindeer Developments v Mindpower Innovations: Land Sale Contract Dispute 03 Oct 2007 Mindpower Innovations Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	03 Oct 2007	Mindpower Innovations Pte Ltd (Defendant): Caveat to remain on registerThe caveat lodged by the defendant is to remain on the register of the Singapore Land Authority pending cross-examination of affidavits.
11	Travista Development v Tan Kim Swee: Breach of Contract & Estoppel in Property Redevelopment 17 Jun 2007 Kwan Mee Sin (Defendant)Won	17 Jun 2007	Kwan Mee Sin (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedThe defendants' counterclaim was allowed, rescinding the sale and purchase agreement and forfeiting the deposit.
12	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Bankruptcy Discharge Application & Garnishment Validity 31 May 2007 Pakir Maideen (Respondent)Neutral	31 May 2007	Pakir Maideen (Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, with a conditional discharge granted to the appellant.
13	Sysma Construction v EK Developments: Winding Up Dispute & Liquidator Appointment 20 Mar 2007 EK Developments Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	20 Mar 2007	EK Developments Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for leave to petition for the company to be wound up was dismissed.
14	Re Jeyaretnam: Appeal Dismissed on Bankruptcy Discharge Application \| Singapore Insolvency Law 25 Jan 2007 Other Creditors (Respondent, Creditor)Won	25 Jan 2007	Other Creditors (Respondent, Creditor): Objection UpheldObjection to the discharge application was upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Kea Meng Kwang v Merrill Lynch: Examination of Witnesses Outside Jurisdiction 11 Sep 2006 Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (Asia Pacific) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	11 Sep 2006	Merrill Lynch Investment Managers (Asia Pacific) Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal WonAppeal dismissed with costs in favour of the defendant.
16	OCBC v Ang Thian Soo: Guarantee, Summary Judgment & Director's Liability 14 Aug 2006 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Aug 2006	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff): Security OrderedThe defendant was ordered to provide security for $9 million as part of the sum claimed, as well as $500,000 as security for costs on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken v Asia Pacific Breweries: Legal Advice & Litigation Privilege in Fraud Investigation 30 May 2006 Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 May 2006	Asia Pacific Breweries (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAPBS's appeal against the order to produce the PWC Draft Reports was allowed.
18	Candid Water Cooler v United Overseas Bank: Completion Date Dispute in Property Sale 15 May 2006 United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 May 2006	United Overseas Bank Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of UOB; entitled to $128,499.69 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Ho Seek Yueng Novel v J & V Development: Oral Loan & Right of First Refusal Dispute 17 Apr 2006 J & V Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Apr 2006	J & V Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was granted in favor of the defendant.
20	Riduan bin Yusof v Khng Thian Huat: Tenant's Obligations & Fixtures Removal After Tenancy Termination 16 Aug 2005 Choy Mei Har (Respondent)Lost	16 Aug 2005	Choy Mei Har (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; required to bear a portion of the costs.
21	OCBC v Infocommcentre: Overdraft Facility Recall & Misrepresentation in Compromise Agreements 28 Jul 2005 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	28 Jul 2005	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of $34,668,133.72 with interest thereon as at 12 April 2004. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Riduan bin Yusof v Khng Thian Huat: Striking Out Notice of Appeal & Court-Appointed Expert Decision 06 Feb 2005 Choy Mei Har (Respondent)Neutral	06 Feb 2005	Choy Mei Har (Respondent): Application dismissedThe respondents' application to strike out the Notice of Appeal was dismissed with no order on costs.
23	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Appeal Dismissal & Time to File Appeal 16 Jan 2005 UBS AG (Respondent)Won	16 Jan 2005	UBS AG (Respondent): Application to strike out appeal grantedApplication to strike out appeal granted with costs to be taxed and security deposit to be paid equally to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. Calculated amount is UBS AG's share of the security deposit.
24	Goh Chok Tong v Chee Soon Juan: Defamation Damages Assessment - Alleged Mishandling of National Funds 05 Jan 2005 Goh Chok Tong (Plaintiff)Won	05 Jan 2005	Goh Chok Tong (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $300,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan: Defamation Damages Assessment - Alleged Mishandling of National Funds 05 Jan 2005 Lee Kuan Yew (Plaintiff)Won	05 Jan 2005	Lee Kuan Yew (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $200,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Citibank NA v Lim Soo Peng: Summary Judgment, Economic Duress & Undue Influence 29 Nov 2004 Citibank NA (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Nov 2004	Citibank NA (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissed vis-à-vis the prayer for unconditional leave to defend the plaintiff’s claim, affirmed the decision of the assistant registrar on conditional leave to defend, but varied her order on security.Appeal dismissed vis-à-vis the prayer for unconditional leave to defend the plaintiff’s claim, affirmed the decision of the assistant registrar on conditional leave to defend, but varied her order on security. The security to be furnished by the second defendant was reduced from $12,643,654.22 to 25% thereof amounting to $3,160,913.56 ($12,643,654.22 x 25%). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Nguyen Michael Anh v Serial System Ltd: Patent Assignment Dispute over Invention Ownership 25 Nov 2004 Serial System Ltd (Defendant)Won	25 Nov 2004	Serial System Ltd (Defendant): Preliminary issue decided in favor of the defendantThe court found that the plaintiff did not have full title to the Invention or the Patent Application that he purported to assign to the defendant.
28	Jeyaretnam v Krishnan: Appeal Dismissed in Bankruptcy Discharge Case 24 Nov 2004 Indra Krishnan (Respondent)Won	24 Nov 2004	Indra Krishnan (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal against the decision to refuse discharge from bankruptcy was dismissed in favor of the respondent.
29	Oei Hong Leong v Ban Song Long David: Defamation Claim over NatSteel Shareholder Dispute 09 Nov 2004 98 Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	09 Nov 2004	98 Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim dismissedThe defamation claim against the defendant was dismissed.
30	Khng Thian Huat v Riduan bin Yusof: Tenancy Dispute over Property Condition and Costs Allocation 20 Oct 2004 Choy Mei Har (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Oct 2004	Choy Mei Har (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim for double rent dismissed; claim for damages and loss of usage allowed in part. Damages awarded in the sum of $79,170.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
31	Jeyasegaram David v Ban Song Long David: Defamation Claim over 'Playing to the Gallery' Remark 30 Sep 2004 Ban Song Long David (Defendant)Won	30 Sep 2004	Ban Song Long David (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's defamation claim was dismissed with costs to be agreed or taxed by the registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
32	Godfrey Gerald QC v UBS AG: Costs Allocation & Court's Power to Clarify Orders 26 Aug 2004 UBS AG (Respondent)Won	26 Aug 2004	UBS AG (Respondent): WonCosts awarded to UBS (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
33	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Appeal on Misrepresentation & Duty of Care in Foreign Exchange Transactions 28 Jul 2004 UBS AG (Respondent)Won	28 Jul 2004	UBS AG (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of UBS AG, with costs awarded to UBS AG.
34	Salim Anthony v Sumitomo: Assignment of Creditors' Rights & Guarantee Discharge 03 Jun 2004 Salim Anthony (Plaintiff)Won	03 Jun 2004	Salim Anthony (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the court declared the assignment invalid and affirmed the plaintiff's discharge of obligations under the guarantee, entitling him to subrogation rights. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
35	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Misrepresentation in Foreign Exchange Transactions and Banker's Duty of Care 07 Dec 2003 UBS AG (Defendant)Won	07 Dec 2003	UBS AG (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Mak Chik Lun v Loh Kim Her: Enforceability of Deed of Settlement under Moneylenders Act 24 Sep 2003 Goh Lan Kiaw (Defendant)Lost	24 Sep 2003	Goh Lan Kiaw (Defendant): Application DismissedPlaintiffs’ application to exclude certain affidavits of evidence-in-chief allowed, resulting in a setback for the defendants.
37	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Amendment of Statement of Claim During Trial 05 Jun 2003 UBS AG (No 2) (Defendant)Won	05 Jun 2003	UBS AG (No 2) (Defendant): WonDefendant was awarded costs of $5000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
38	Deutsche Bank v Asia Pulp & Paper: Judicial Management Order Dispute 28 Apr 2003 Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (Respondent)Won	28 Apr 2003	Asia Pulp & Paper Co Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
39	Godfrey Gerald QC v UBS AG: Ad Hoc Admission & Legal Representation in Banking Dispute 14 Apr 2003 UBS AG (Respondent)Won	14 Apr 2003	UBS AG (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts of $5000 awarded to UBS AG. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
40	De Lacy Richard QC: Ad Hoc Admission & Costs in Legal Profession Act Application 12 Mar 2003 UBS AG (Respondent, Defendant)Won	12 Mar 2003	UBS AG (Respondent, Defendant): Costs AwardedUBS AG was awarded costs of $5,000, to be paid by Anthony Wee (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
41	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore: Review of Taxation of Costs 20 Feb 2003 Davinder Singh and another, proposed interveners (Third Party)	20 Feb 2003	Davinder Singh and another, proposed interveners (Third Party): -
42	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Discovery of Banker's Books and Relevancy in Fraud/Negligence Claim 09 Feb 2003 UBS AG (Respondent)Won	09 Feb 2003	UBS AG (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be released to the respondent UBS to account of its costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
43	Elis Tjoa v United Overseas Bank: Forgery, Bank's Duty of Care & Contractual Terms 01 Jan 2003 United Overseas Bank (Defendant)Won	01 Jan 2003	United Overseas Bank (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
44	ICB Ltd v P. D. International: Rectification of Security Memorandum for MEP Facilities 14 Nov 2002 Industrial & Commercial Bank Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Nov 2002	Industrial & Commercial Bank Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedICB's claim for a declaration that the Twinwood shares stand as security for PDI's liability to ICB under the PDMI guarantee was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
45	Wee v UBS AG: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel Denied 01 Nov 2002 UBS AG (Defendant)Won	01 Nov 2002	UBS AG (Defendant): Costs AwardedCosts of $5,000 awarded against the Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
46	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Right to Legal Representation for Litigants in Person 15 Sep 2002 UBS AG (Defendant, Respondent)Won	15 Sep 2002	UBS AG (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's attempt to have a lawyer argue on his behalf as a friend.
47	Anthony Wee v UBS AG: Discovery, Banking Act, and Evidence Act in Foreign Exchange Transactions 06 Sep 2002 UBS AG (Defendant, Respondent)Won	06 Sep 2002	UBS AG (Defendant, Respondent): Application GrantedDefendant's application for orders under section 175 of the Evidence Act to inspect bank records was granted.
48	KLW Holdings v SPH: Newspaper Rule & Pre-Trial Discovery in Libel Suit 15 Jul 2002 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Respondent, Defendant)Won	15 Jul 2002	Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. (Respondent, Defendant): Application DismissedApplication for pre-trial discovery was dismissed in favor of Singapore Press Holdings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
49	Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan: Applications for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel 06 Jun 2002 Goh Chok Tong (Plaintiff)Neutral	06 Jun 2002	Goh Chok Tong (Plaintiff): NeutralThe application for ad hoc admission of Queen's Counsel to represent the defendant was dismissed.
50	Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel in Defamation Suit 17 Apr 2002 Goh Chok Tong (Plaintiff)Neutral	17 Apr 2002	Goh Chok Tong (Plaintiff): NeutralPlaintiff in the underlying defamation suit. The outcome of this application does not directly impact the outcome of the underlying suit.
51	Bayerische Landesbank v Kong Kok Keong: Forum Non Conveniens & Jurisdiction in Loan Contract Dispute 18 Mar 2002 Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	18 Mar 2002	Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
52	Tai Sea Nyong v Overseas Union Bank: Mortgagee's Duty of Sale & Property Valuation 27 Feb 2002 Overseas Union Bank Ltd (Defendant)Won	27 Feb 2002	Overseas Union Bank Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
53	Lee Kuan Yew v Chee Soon Juan: Application for Ad Hoc Admission of Queen's Counsel 30 Jan 2002 Lee Kuan Yew (Plaintiff)Neutral	30 Jan 2002	Lee Kuan Yew (Plaintiff): NeutralThe court made no orders against Lee Kuan Yew in this application for ad hoc admission.
54	Littlemore Stuart QC v Chee Soon Juan: Ad Hoc Admission & Disparagement of Singapore Judiciary 30 Jan 2002 Lee Kuan Yew (Other)	30 Jan 2002	Lee Kuan Yew (Other): -
55	Aberdeen Asset Management v Fraser & Neave: Oppression of Minority Shareholders 10 Oct 2001 Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd (Applicant, Respondent)Other	10 Oct 2001	Aberdeen Asset Management Asia Ltd (Applicant, Respondent): -
56	Aberdeen Asset Management v Fraser & Neave: Appeal Timing & Interlocutory Orders in Defamation Case 10 Oct 2001 Hugh Young (Appellant, Respondent)Won	10 Oct 2001	Hugh Young (Appellant, Respondent): Motion AllowedThe court allowed the motion of Aberdeen & Young for an extension of time to file their notice of appeal. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
57	Lee Huay Kok v Attorney General: Director Disqualification after Corruption Conviction 30 Sep 2001 Lee Huay Kok (Applicant)Lost	30 Sep 2001	Lee Huay Kok (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to act as a director was dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
58	Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Lee Kuan Yew: Striking Out Action for Want of Prosecution in Defamation Case 21 Aug 2001 Lee Kuan Yew (Respondent)Won	21 Aug 2001	Lee Kuan Yew (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs; deposit in court to be paid to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
59	Jeyaretnam v Lee Kuan Yew: Striking Out Action for Want of Prosecution in Defamation Case 21 Aug 2001 Lee Kuan Yew (Respondent)Won	21 Aug 2001	Lee Kuan Yew (Respondent): Application to Strike Out Action DismissedThe appellant's application to strike out the respondent's action was dismissed, and this decision was upheld on appeal. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
60	Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Indra Krishnan: Bankruptcy Order Appeal for Default on Debt Instalments 06 Aug 2001 Indra Krishnan (Respondent)Won	06 Aug 2001	Indra Krishnan (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent successfully defended the appeal against the bankruptcy order.
61	Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam v Indra Krishnan: Defamation Claim 06 Aug 2001 Indra Krishnan (Respondent)	06 Aug 2001	Indra Krishnan (Respondent): -
62	Industrial & Commercial Bank Ltd v Banco Ambrosiano Veneto S.P.A.: Standby Letters of Credit & Banking Fraud 30 May 2001 Industrial & Commercial Bank Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 May 2001	Industrial & Commercial Bank Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff as claimed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
63	Fraser & Neave v Aberdeen Asset Management: Defamation Claim over CMB Asia Takeover 23 May 2001 Ian Alastair Maclean (Plaintiff, Respondent)Neutral	23 May 2001	Ian Alastair Maclean (Plaintiff, Respondent): Order accordinglyCourt determined the natural and ordinary meaning of the words in the letter.
64	Fraser and Neave v Aberdeen: Defamation Claim over CMB Asia Takeover 23 May 2001 Ian Alastair Maclean (Plaintiff, Respondent)Neutral	23 May 2001	Ian Alastair Maclean (Plaintiff, Respondent): NeutralThe court ruled that whether there is a sufficient nexus between Mr. Maclean and the allegedly defamatory words should be determined at trial.
65	Fraser and Neave v Aberdeen Asset Management: Defamation Claim over Minority Shareholder Treatment 23 May 2001 Ian Alastair Maclean (Plaintiff, Respondent)Neutral	23 May 2001	Ian Alastair Maclean (Plaintiff, Respondent): Meaning of words determinedThe court determined the meaning of the words in the letter.
66	Pacific Century v Canadian Imperial: Tag-Along Clause & Share Transfer Dispute 05 Apr 2001 Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	05 Apr 2001	Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd (Respondent, Appellant): Claim DismissedClaim for damages in respect of a breach of clause 11(E) dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
67	Lee Kuan Yew v Joshua Benjamin Jeyaretnam: Defamation Claim over Election Rally Remarks 19 Mar 2001 Lee Kuan Yew (Plaintiff)Won	19 Mar 2001	Lee Kuan Yew (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal to strike out the action was dismissed.
68	Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin v Judgment Creditor: Bankruptcy Order Appeal for Failure to Pay Instalments 11 Mar 2001 Judgment Creditor (Respondent, Creditor)Won	11 Mar 2001	Judgment Creditor (Respondent, Creditor): Bankruptcy order upheldThe appeal against the bankruptcy order was dismissed, upholding the original order. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
69	Windsor Holdings Pte Ltd: Winding Up Petition for Inability to Pay Debts 12 Feb 2001 Overseas Chinese Banking Corp (Petitioner)Won	12 Feb 2001	Overseas Chinese Banking Corp (Petitioner): Petition grantedPetition to wind up the company was granted.
70	OCBC v Tan Geok Ser: Guarantee, Loan Agreement & Bank's Duty of Good Faith 01 Dec 2000 Overseas-Chinese Bank Corporation Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	01 Dec 2000	Overseas-Chinese Bank Corporation Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and final judgment awarded to the plaintiffs with costs against both defendants on an indemnity basis. The judgment amount is based on the loan of S$80.8m. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
71	Tong Guan Food Products v Ong: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Share Ownership Dispute 30 Oct 2000 Tong Guan Food Products Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Oct 2000	Tong Guan Food Products Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; costs to be agreed upon or taxed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
72	Canadian Imperial v Pacific Century: Breach of Tag-Along Clause in Joint Venture Agreement 17 Sep 2000 Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	17 Sep 2000	Canadian Imperial Investment Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiffs' claim allowed; damages awarded based on the market price of Tricom shares as at date of judgment and US$1,025,000 for shareholder's loans (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts).
73	Industrial & Commercial Bank v Banco Ambrosiano: Forum Non Conveniens & Standby Letters of Credit 15 Sep 2000 Industrial & Commercial Bank Limited (Plaintiff)Won	15 Sep 2000	Industrial & Commercial Bank Limited (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedThe defendant's appeal for a stay of proceedings was dismissed.
74	Tiang Ming Sing v Datuk Ambrose Joseph Lee: Stock Trading, Moneylending, and Fiduciary Duty 25 May 2000 Tiang Ming Sing (Plaintiff)Lost	25 May 2000	Tiang Ming Sing (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim against all three defendants was dismissed with costs.
75	Jeyaretnam Joshua Benjamin: Appeal Against Bankruptcy Order Based on Statutory Debt Threshold and Instalment Agreement 15 May 2000 Ravindran s/o Ramasamy (Petitioning Creditor, Respondent)Withdrawn	15 May 2000	Ravindran s/o Ramasamy (Petitioning Creditor, Respondent): Petition WithdrawnBankruptcy petition withdrawn.