Highway Video Pte Ltd v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Highway Video Pte Ltd and others appealed to the High Court of Singapore against their conviction and sentence. The case was heard on 11 December 2001, with Yong Pung How CJ presiding. The judgment extract does not provide details of the legal issues or the court's ultimate decision.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
No outcome information provided in the judgment extract.
1.3 Case Type
Criminal
1.4 Judgment Type
Judgment
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
Appeal against conviction and sentence by Highway Video Pte Ltd. The High Court heard the case on 11 December 2001.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Highway Video Pte Ltd | Appellant | Corporation | No outcome information provided in the judgment extract. | Neutral | |
Public Prosecutor | Respondent | Government Agency | No outcome information provided in the judgment extract. | Neutral |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Yong Pung How | Chief Justice | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|
4. Facts
5. Formal Citations
- Highway Video Pte Ltd & 2 Ors v Public Prosecutor (Lim Tai Wah), MA No 203-205 of 2001, [2001] SGHC 371
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Decision Date |
7. Legal Issues
8. Remedies Sought
- No remedies sought
9. Cause of Actions
- No cause of actions
10. Practice Areas
- Criminal Law
11. Industries
- Video
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
No cited cases |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
No applicable statutes |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- No key terms specified
15.2 Keywords
- Criminal
- Appeal
- Conviction
- Sentence
16. Subjects
- No subjects specified
17. Areas of Law
- Criminal Law