Public Prosecutor
Public Prosecutor is a government agency in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 1898 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 802 counsels. Through 26 law firms. Their track record shows a 72.1% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 109 complex cases, representing 5.7% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Public Prosecutor has been represented by 26 law firms and 802 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Attorney-General’s Chambers | 3 cases |
| Deputy Public Prosecutors | 1 case |
| Tito Isaac & Co LLP | 1 case |
| Public Prosecutor | 1 case |
| Deputy Public Prosecutor | 4 cases |
| Prosecution | 1 case |
| Attorney-General’s Chambers (Criminal Justice Division) | 1 case |
| Attorney-General’s Chamber | 1 case |
| Independent Practitioner | 2 cases |
| Attorney–General’s Chambers | 1 case |
| DPPs | 1 case |
| Tan Peng Chin LLC | 1 case |
| B T Tan & Company | 1 case |
| Ministry of Manpower Legal Services Division | 1 case |
| District Attorney's Office | 1 case |
| AG's Chambers | 1 case |
| Tan See Swan & Co. | 1 case |
| The Attorney-General's Chambers | 1 case |
| Attorney’s General Chambers | 1 case |
| DPP | 1 case |
| Attorney-General Chambers | 1 case |
| Deputy Public Proseutor | 1 case |
| Liberty Law Practice LLP | 1 case |
| Attorney-Generael's Chambers | 1 case |
| Attorney-General's Cambers | 1 case |
| Principal Senior State Counsel | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Public Prosecutor's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 2.3
- Complex Cases
- 109 (5.7%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Dismissed | 12.0 parties avg |
| Lost | 2342.2 parties avg |
| Neutral | 372.5 parties avg |
| Other | 72.0 parties avg |
| Partial | 2372.4 parties avg |
| Remanded | 42.5 parties avg |
| Won | 1,3682.3 parties avg |
| 102.8 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 103.0 parties avg |
| 2024 | 912.3 parties avg |
| 2023 | 902.3 parties avg |
| 2022 | 992.2 parties avg |
| 2021 | 962.2 parties avg |
| 2020 | 812.3 parties avg |
| 2019 | 912.3 parties avg |
| 2018 | 842.3 parties avg |
| 2017 | 1022.3 parties avg |
| 2016 | 892.1 parties avg |
| 2015 | 732.2 parties avg |
| 2014 | 722.1 parties avg |
| 2013 | 442.5 parties avg |
| 2012 | 512.3 parties avg |
| 2011 | 632.6 parties avg |
| 2010 | 642.4 parties avg |
| 2009 | 632.2 parties avg |
| 2008 | 382.1 parties avg |
| 2007 | 372.2 parties avg |
| 2006 | 462.1 parties avg |
| 2005 | 562.2 parties avg |
| 2004 | 742.2 parties avg |
| 2003 | 1002.3 parties avg |
| 2002 | 992.3 parties avg |
| 2001 | 1042.1 parties avg |
| 2000 | 812.2 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Public Prosecutor's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| 10(0.5%) | |
| Other | 7(0.4%) |
| Won | 1368(72.1%) |
| Dismissed | 1(0.1%) |
| Partial | 237(12.5%) |
| Remanded | 4(0.2%) |
| Lost | 234(12.3%) |
| Neutral | 37(1.9%) |
Monetary Outcomes
| Currency | Average |
|---|---|
| SGD | 17,356.52177 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2025 | 2 19 |
| 2024 | 5 9111070 |
| 2023 | 3 111366 |
| 2022 | 4 86841 |
| 2021 | 5 446181 |
| 2020 | 4 921456 |
| 2019 | 4 1731853 |
| 2018 | 6 72113160 |
| 2017 | 4 1111971 |
| 2016 | 5 14211062 |
| 2015 | 5 10411147 |
| 2014 | 6 116141391 |
| 2013 | 5 1029221 |
| 2012 | 4 1315221 |
| 2011 | 4 104643 |
| 2010 | 4 1511137 |
| 2009 | 4 112842 |
| 2008 | 5 711227 |
| 2007 | 4 42427 |
| 2006 | 3 71128 |
| 2005 | 4 46451 |
| 2004 | 4 31763 |
| 2003 | 3 14581 |
| 2002 | 3 10782 |
| 2001 | 6 5716814 |
| 2000 | 4 55701 |
Case History
Displaying all 1,898 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
25 Feb 2025 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
18 Feb 2025 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Prosecution's appeals against the acquittal of Sim and Tjioe were allowed in the Conviction Judgment. |
13 Feb 2025 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's application for permission to make a review application. |
09 Feb 2025 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence of one week's imprisonment was upheld. |
04 Feb 2025 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence. |
03 Feb 2025 | Respondent | WonThe application for permission to make a review application and for a stay of execution was dismissed. |
22 Jan 2025 | Prosecution | WonThe court re-affirmed its original conviction of Muhammed Izwan bin Borhan for trafficking diamorphine and methamphetamine, and Ahmad Suhaimi bin Ismail for abetting those offenses. |
15 Jan 2025 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against conviction and sentence for forgery. |
08 Jan 2025 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 16 years’ imprisonment. |
07 Jan 2025 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
30 Dec 2024 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused convicted. |
15 Dec 2024 | Applicant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's application for a joint trial of the respondents was granted. |
15 Dec 2024 | Prosecution | WonDefendants convicted on all charges. |
11 Dec 2024 | Petitioner | PartialAppeal allowed in part; USD41,900 to be returned to the respondent and USD611.55 forfeited to the State. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
05 Dec 2024 | Respondent | PartialSentence reduced on appeal. |
05 Dec 2024 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended against the applicant's application. |
03 Dec 2024 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the court recalibrating the in-default imprisonment term upwards. |
02 Dec 2024 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; original sentence of eight months' imprisonment upheld. |
02 Dec 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Respondent successfully defended the appeal. |
28 Nov 2024 | Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction was dismissed. |
27 Nov 2024 | Respondent | PartialAppeal upheld in part with respect to Farid's sentence. |
27 Nov 2024 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's application. |
24 Nov 2024 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against imprisonment partially allowed; sentence reduced to three weeks' imprisonment. |
21 Nov 2024 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the original sentence was altered. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
07 Nov 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
05 Nov 2024 | Prosecution | WonIswan bin Ali was convicted of the altered charge. |
05 Nov 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
29 Oct 2024 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the imprisonment sentence was replaced with a fine of $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
28 Oct 2024 | Applicant | WonThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the fine imposed by the High Court and dismissing the respondent's appeal against sentence in the General Division of the High Court. |
22 Oct 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence of 16 years' imprisonment. |
21 Oct 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence of reformative training. |
20 Oct 2024 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on charges of rape, outrage of modesty, and harbouring a person who had escaped from a place of safety. |
15 Oct 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
14 Oct 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for a stay of execution. |
09 Oct 2024 | Respondent | WonThe six-week imprisonment term, disqualification, and prohibition orders were upheld. |
02 Oct 2024 | Prosecution | PartialThe Prosecution's sentencing position was partially adopted by the court. |
02 Oct 2024 | Respondent | WonThe application for stay of execution was dismissed. |
30 Sep 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 34 and a half years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane, with an additional six months’ imprisonment in lieu of caning. |
26 Sep 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor opposed the motion for review, and the motion was dismissed. |
24 Sep 2024 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence imposed was allowed. |
16 Sep 2024 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved all charges against the Accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
16 Sep 2024 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of trafficking 51.41g of diamorphine. |
12 Sep 2024 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's application to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal. |
08 Sep 2024 | Respondent | WonThe application to transfer the case from the State Courts to the High Court was dismissed. |
05 Sep 2024 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's motion. |
29 Aug 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
29 Aug 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
28 Aug 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
25 Aug 2024 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction for drug trafficking. |
22 Aug 2024 | Respondent | WonOriginal sentence upheld. |
14 Aug 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
13 Aug 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
07 Aug 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of murder under section 300(c) of the Penal Code. |
01 Aug 2024 | Respondent | WonApplication for stay of execution was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
31 Jul 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed BWJ's application for permission to review the Court of Appeal’s decision in CA/CCA 20/2020. |
29 Jul 2024 | Respondent | WonCriminal motion dismissed. |
29 Jul 2024 | Respondent | WonCosts of $5,000 awarded against the applicant's counsel, Ong Ying Ping (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Jul 2024 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was overturned. |
21 Jul 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed. |
18 Jul 2024 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended against the application for revision. |
08 Jul 2024 | Prosecution | WonConviction on all charges |
03 Jul 2024 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased. |
03 Jul 2024 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
02 Jul 2024 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Prosecution's cross-appeal against Sim's sentence for the Cheating Charges is allowed. The Prosecution’s appeal against Sim’s acquittal on the Companies Act Charge and Tjioe’s acquittal on the Abetment of Cheating Charges are allowed. |
30 Jun 2024 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of Salihin on the murder charge was allowed. |
30 Jun 2024 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal was allowed, and the Accused was convicted on all charges. |
25 Jun 2024 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court imposed a sentence of reformative training at Level 2 intensity for a minimum period of detention of 12 months. |
25 Jun 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
23 Jun 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
13 Jun 2024 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially successful as the appellant's sentence was reduced. |
29 May 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
20 May 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for permission to review. |
20 May 2024 | Prosecution | WonThe accused were found guilty and sentenced. |
20 May 2024 | Respondent | WonThe court enhanced the sentence to 14 months' imprisonment. |
19 May 2024 | Respondent | WonThe application for criminal reference was dismissed. |
16 May 2024 | Respondent | WonThe application for Justice Tay Yong Kwang to recuse himself from hearing CM 15 was dismissed. |
16 May 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
14 May 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment, backdated to the date of his arrest. |
07 May 2024 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's contestation of the application was dismissed. |
07 May 2024 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was set aside. |
29 Apr 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of abetment by conspiracy to commit rape. |
18 Apr 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on both charges. |
01 Apr 2024 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and convicted. |
27 Mar 2024 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended the appeal. |
20 Mar 2024 | Prosecution | LostAccused acquitted on all charges. |
20 Mar 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original sentence. |
18 Mar 2024 | Respondent | WonAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
17 Mar 2024 | Respondent | WonThe application for permission to refer the four questions to the Court of Appeal was refused in its entirety. |
17 Mar 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of drug trafficking. |
14 Mar 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted on all four charges. |
12 Mar 2024 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed and the original sentence was overturned. |
07 Mar 2024 | Prosecution | OtherThe Prosecution has appealed against the decision to sentence the accused to reformative training. |
29 Feb 2024 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence. |
04 Feb 2024 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to a global sentence of 13 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane. |
31 Jan 2024 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's application for the judge to recuse himself from hearing the s 394H Application. |
30 Jan 2024 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the DJ's decision to acquit the Accused was allowed. |
28 Jan 2024 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the Respondent was dismissed. |
16 Jan 2024 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original sentence. |
10 Jan 2024 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction for rioting allowed in part; altered charges framed. |
09 Jan 2024 | Respondent | PartialThe Prosecution's application in Criminal Revision No 3 of 2023 was allowed in part, revising the sentence for one of the charges. |
09 Jan 2024 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved the charge against Mr. Lim beyond a reasonable doubt. |
27 Dec 2023 | Prosecution | PartialThe Prosecution sought 12 to 16 years of imprisonment, and the court imposed a sentence of 16 years. |
17 Dec 2023 | Respondent | WonThe original sentence of eight weeks’ imprisonment, a fine of $10,000, and a lifetime disqualification order was affirmed. |
10 Dec 2023 | Respondent | PartialThe appellant's appeal against the sentence was partially successful. |
10 Dec 2023 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part in that the sentence of preventive detention was backdated to the date of his arrest. |
29 Nov 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Court dismissed the applicant's motion. |
28 Nov 2023 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant. |
05 Nov 2023 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed. |
02 Nov 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeals of both Lee and Yap. |
30 Oct 2023 | Respondent | WonCriminal Motion dismissed summarily. |
30 Oct 2023 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
30 Oct 2023 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to a total of 17 years’ imprisonment, with an additional 12 months’ imprisonment in lieu of caning. |
29 Oct 2023 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended against the applicant's applications. |
29 Oct 2023 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence overturned, original sentence of 16 months' imprisonment reduced to 12 months' imprisonment. |
26 Oct 2023 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant for house-breaking and theft was upheld. |
25 Oct 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 12 years and six months’ imprisonment and 13 strokes of the cane. |
19 Oct 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Criminal Motion filed by the applicant was dismissed. |
16 Oct 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against sentence was dismissed. |
11 Oct 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the Applicant's application for bail. |
02 Oct 2023 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence partially upheld, with the global sentence calibrated downwards to 18 years and 6 months’ imprisonment. |
02 Oct 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed. |
28 Sep 2023 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. |
19 Sep 2023 | Respondent | LostThe initial sentence of 16 weeks' imprisonment was reduced to 12 weeks' imprisonment. |
18 Sep 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor's requested sentence was largely imposed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
17 Sep 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of trafficking 269.1 grams of methamphetamine. |
13 Sep 2023 | Respondent | WonAppeal against sentence dismissed. |
10 Sep 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Court affirmed the decision of the trial judge and dismissed the appeal against conviction. |
07 Sep 2023 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed. |
06 Sep 2023 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended the appeal against the disqualification order. |
04 Sep 2023 | Respondent | WonThe District Court's orders for remand and access to counsel were upheld. |
24 Aug 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved the charges against both accused. |
21 Aug 2023 | Appellant | PartialAppeal allowed in part with respect to all but two of the charges. |
14 Aug 2023 | Prosecution | Won |
09 Aug 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original disposal orders. |
03 Aug 2023 | Respondent | LostThe court ruled against the Public Prosecutor, holding that the previously served sentence should be treated as going towards the default sentence. |
01 Aug 2023 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against the sentence of reformative training. |
30 Jul 2023 | Appellant, Respondent | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
26 Jul 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence. |
20 Jul 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence for drug trafficking. |
13 Jul 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the 21-month detention at Singapore Girl's Home was dismissed. |
13 Jul 2023 | Appellant | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed in part. The fine of $1m for each charge imposed by the DJ is to stand. However, the respondent is to serve 12 months’ imprisonment (instead of eight months) in default of payment for each charge or 36 months’ imprisonment in total. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
12 Jul 2023 | Appellant | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the sentence enhanced to 80 months. |
11 Jul 2023 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
05 Jul 2023 | Respondent | PartialThe Court of Appeal reduced the aggregate sentence. |
04 Jul 2023 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the application for criminal revision. |
02 Jul 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentences imposed by the District Judge was dismissed. |
29 Jun 2023 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty as charged and convicted accordingly. |
26 Jun 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Respondent successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence for the Drink-Driving Charge. |
20 Jun 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. |
18 Jun 2023 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused convicted on the charges against them. |
15 Jun 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original sentence. |
15 Jun 2023 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 29 years' imprisonment and caning. |
11 Jun 2023 | Plaintiff | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted three of the four accused. |
04 Jun 2023 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's application for permission to make a review application. |
04 Jun 2023 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's initial order for the appellant to reside in a JRC for 12 months was overturned. |
28 May 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured a guilty verdict against both accused. |
24 May 2023 | Prosecution | LostProsecution failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused intentionally inflicted the intra-abdominal injuries on the Victim. |
17 May 2023 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of murder. |
16 May 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for the release of funds. |
15 May 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved the charge against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
15 May 2023 | Respondent | WonApplication for permission to make a review application was dismissed summarily. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
15 May 2023 | Respondent | LostThe court allowed the applicant's criminal motion to rely on additional grounds of appeal. |
11 May 2023 | Respondent | LostAppeal against sentence was allowed, and the original sentence was substituted with a Probation Order. |
11 May 2023 | Prosecution | LostAll charges against the defendant were dismissed due to reasonable doubt. |
10 May 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
08 May 2023 | Respondent, Appellant, Applicant | PartialAppeal against sentence partially allowed; sentences adjusted. |
03 May 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions on all charges. |
26 Apr 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence of Dzulkarnain bin Khamis. |
25 Apr 2023 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part. Conviction on original charge substituted with a charge of attempted possession. |
24 Apr 2023 | Respondent | WonThe application for review was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
20 Apr 2023 | Respondent | WonThe original sentence of two weeks’ imprisonment was affirmed. |
19 Apr 2023 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the original order was substituted. |
13 Apr 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe court found both accused guilty of the charges. |
12 Apr 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's position to seek a discharge not amounting to an acquittal was upheld. |
12 Apr 2023 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal of Tan Chee Beng on three charges was allowed. |
30 Mar 2023 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane. |
29 Mar 2023 | Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction was successful; the Public Prosecutor's case was dismissed. |
22 Mar 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for review. |
16 Mar 2023 | Prosecution | WonThe court determined that s 33B(3)(b) of the Misuse of Drugs Act was not satisfied. |
16 Mar 2023 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent was sentenced to five weeks' imprisonment. |
27 Feb 2023 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's motion. |
22 Feb 2023 | Respondent | WonCriminal motion dismissed summarily without setting it down for hearing. |
21 Feb 2023 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; sentence increased to seven weeks' imprisonment and a nine-month driving disqualification order imposed. |
16 Feb 2023 | Respondent | PartialThe sentences imposed by the District Judge were set aside and substituted with a sentence of one week and three weeks’ imprisonment respectively, for an aggregate imprisonment of four weeks. |
06 Feb 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed. |
02 Feb 2023 | Respondent | WonThe application for leave to review the earlier judgment was dismissed. |
31 Jan 2023 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal against the imprisonment term was dismissed. The appeal against the caning sentence was partially allowed. |
25 Jan 2023 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Kong Wei Keong Marcus was dismissed. |
15 Jan 2023 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on both charges. |
11 Jan 2023 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
10 Jan 2023 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the Judge’s acquittal was allowed. |
01 Dec 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the District Court's decision. |
01 Dec 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane. |
30 Nov 2022 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part; death penalty set aside and re-sentenced to imprisonment for life. |
30 Nov 2022 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Prosecution's appeals in MA 9280 and MA 9008 were allowed in part. |
23 Nov 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of murder. |
20 Nov 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal dismissed the applications, upholding the convictions of the applicants. |
15 Nov 2022 | Prosecution | Unknown |
13 Nov 2022 | Respondent | WonThe application for bail was dismissed. |
10 Nov 2022 | Appellant, Respondent, Applicant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal on the Common Intention Charge was dismissed. |
02 Nov 2022 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the application for extension of time to appeal against sentence. |
01 Nov 2022 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the fines were substituted with imprisonment terms. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
30 Oct 2022 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; conviction overturned. |
26 Oct 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to the mandatory death penalty. |
26 Oct 2022 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
18 Oct 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant. |
18 Oct 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
17 Oct 2022 | Appellant | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed in part. Azlin was convicted of the alternative s 300(c) charge. Ridzuan's sentence was enhanced to life imprisonment, but the caning was removed. |
11 Oct 2022 | Respondent | WonThe court enhanced the sentence to 37 months and three weeks’ imprisonment. |
10 Oct 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed. |
09 Oct 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal. |
09 Oct 2022 | Respondent, Appellant | WonCosts of $3,000 awarded to the Prosecution. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Oct 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Saridewi's conviction and sentence. |
02 Oct 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted as charged. |
28 Sep 2022 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed and the appellant's sentence was reduced. |
27 Sep 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed, upholding the Public Prosecutor's position. |
26 Sep 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original decision. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Sep 2022 | Respondent | WonCosts of $2,000 awarded to the Prosecution (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
12 Sep 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on all charges. |
11 Sep 2022 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's motion for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal against his sentence. |
24 Aug 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
23 Aug 2022 | Prosecution | WonLee and Yap were convicted of their respective charges. |
22 Aug 2022 | Respondent | LostAppeal against sentence allowed; sentence reduced from 60 months to 48 months imprisonment. |
21 Aug 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted the Defendant on the 1st Charge (Amended) under s 5(1)(a) read with s 5(2) of the Misuse of Drugs Act. |
21 Aug 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the sentence of preventive detention. |
17 Aug 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to an aggregate of 45 years’ imprisonment. |
16 Aug 2022 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against sentence partially dismissed, with the remaining individual sentences upheld. |
09 Aug 2022 | Appellant | WonThe appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
26 Jul 2022 | Respondent | WonCosts of $1,000 awarded against Lawyers for Liberty and $4,000 against Mr. Yeo. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Jul 2022 | Respondent | WonOriginal sentence of six months' imprisonment and five-year disqualification order upheld. |
18 Jul 2022 | Respondent | WonThe applicant's criminal motion was dismissed. |
18 Jul 2022 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
14 Jul 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on all four charges of sexual assault. |
14 Jul 2022 | Respondent | WonAwarded costs of $3,000, to be paid by the applicant's former counsel. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
06 Jul 2022 | Respondent | WonApplication for stay of execution dismissed. |
06 Jul 2022 | Prosecution | LostAccused sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
06 Jul 2022 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
06 Jul 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
04 Jul 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the appellant's conviction and the mandatory death penalty imposed upon him. |
28 Jun 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed, upholding the original sentence. |
27 Jun 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe court upheld the original conviction and sentence. |
26 Jun 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
22 Jun 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant. |
14 Jun 2022 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against sentences and disqualification orders. |
26 May 2022 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's case against Raj Kumar and Ramadass was overturned on appeal. |
26 May 2022 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was overturned. |
25 May 2022 | Respondent | WonCosts awarded against the applicant's counsels. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 May 2022 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part; disqualification order reduced from 15 months to 12 months (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
22 May 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 18 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
22 May 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant. |
19 May 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
18 May 2022 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal for a higher sentence was allowed. |
17 May 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
16 May 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
12 May 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on the charge. |
10 May 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed. |
08 May 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of drug trafficking offence. |
05 May 2022 | Respondent | WonAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
03 May 2022 | Respondent | WonCriminal Motion dismissed in its entirety. |
28 Apr 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of the Charge. |
25 Apr 2022 | Respondent | WonCriminal motion dismissed. |
24 Apr 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of the charge. |
17 Apr 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on all three charges of importing controlled drugs. |
11 Apr 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant. |
06 Apr 2022 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
30 Mar 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
30 Mar 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, and the life imprisonment sentence was affirmed. |
30 Mar 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of 36 charges and sentenced to 29 years' imprisonment. |
28 Mar 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe court found that the matters raised by Mohd Noor did not affect his conviction. |
17 Mar 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 13 years, three months and four weeks’ imprisonment. |
17 Mar 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 33 years and two months’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
13 Mar 2022 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Prosecution's appeals against the sentences imposed on Chong Hock Yen and the three corporate entities were allowed. |
13 Mar 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and sentence of death. |
10 Mar 2022 | Respondent | WonThe application for leave to make an application to review the decision was dismissed. |
08 Mar 2022 | Respondent | WonThe application to adduce further evidence was dismissed. |
06 Mar 2022 | Respondent | WonApplication for review was dismissed. |
03 Mar 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
24 Feb 2022 | Prosecution | WonDefendants convicted on all charges. |
22 Feb 2022 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the murder conviction. |
22 Feb 2022 | Respondent | WonThe court upheld the conviction and sentence imposed by the Judge. |
21 Feb 2022 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane. |
07 Feb 2022 | Respondent | WonThe application for leave to review the concluded appeal was dismissed. |
03 Feb 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused on their respective charges. |
26 Jan 2022 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; original conviction and sentence upheld. |
23 Jan 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to five years’ detention. |
18 Jan 2022 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction and sentence. |
16 Jan 2022 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's application for an extension of time to file a notice of appeal against his sentence. |
12 Jan 2022 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment. |
12 Jan 2022 | Appellant | PartialAppeal allowed on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 11th charges. |
11 Jan 2022 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
30 Dec 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of all charges. |
29 Dec 2021 | Applicant, Respondent | NeutralThe Court answered the referred question in the negative, clarifying the interpretation of s 13(1) of the PCA. |
27 Dec 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for review. |
23 Dec 2021 | Respondent | WonApplication dismissed; applicant ordered to pay costs of $2,000 to the Prosecution (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
12 Dec 2021 | Respondent | NeutralOriginal finding that the Alleged Introductory Meeting took place on 12 October 2011 remains unaffected. |
30 Nov 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal, and the sentence was enhanced to eight years and five months' imprisonment and a fine of S$20,000 (in default one month’s imprisonment). |
29 Nov 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeals against the convictions and sentences. |
28 Nov 2021 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
25 Nov 2021 | Respondent | WonAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
18 Nov 2021 | Respondent | WonThe original sentence was upheld. |
17 Nov 2021 | Respondent | PartialThe constitutional challenge against the MTO Provisions failed. The case was remitted for further clarification regarding compliance with section 339(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code. |
16 Nov 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
14 Nov 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on the charge of drug trafficking. |
10 Nov 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Roshdi's conviction and sentence. |
10 Nov 2021 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially denied as the imprisonment term was only reduced from one week to five days. |
08 Nov 2021 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on the charge of murder under s 300(c) of the Penal Code. |
04 Nov 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. |
24 Oct 2021 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Ramendra Krishnan on charges related to drug trafficking and possession. |
21 Oct 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
19 Oct 2021 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
29 Sep 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
27 Sep 2021 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the disqualification order was dismissed. |
22 Sep 2021 | Respondent | PartialThe court ordered a joint retrial of both altered charges before a different judge of the General Division of the High Court. |
21 Sep 2021 | Respondent, Applicant | NeutralNo order was made on Criminal Motion No 23 of 2021. |
21 Sep 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of trafficking in diamorphine. |
20 Sep 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Applicant's application for leave to intervene was dismissed. |
13 Sep 2021 | Respondent | WonThe criminal motion brought by the applicant was dismissed. |
12 Sep 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and sentenced to death. |
09 Sep 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 22 years and six months’ imprisonment, with an additional six months’ imprisonment in lieu of caning. |
25 Aug 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
24 Aug 2021 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
15 Aug 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence. |
10 Aug 2021 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's motion. |
04 Aug 2021 | Respondent | WonThe application for leave to review the earlier judgment was dismissed. |
03 Aug 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 30 years’ imprisonment. |
02 Aug 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence. |
01 Aug 2021 | Prosecution | WonIsham is convicted of the Charge. |
29 Jul 2021 | Prosecution | LostThe court held that the statements were made involuntarily and should not be admitted into evidence. |
26 Jul 2021 | Prosecution | WonDefendant convicted on all charges. |
22 Jul 2021 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Prosecution’s appeals against the acquittals on the original charges were allowed. |
08 Jul 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal dismissed the application. |
06 Jul 2021 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution proved the two charges beyond a reasonable doubt. |
06 Jul 2021 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and caning. |
04 Jul 2021 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed on the grounds that the District Judge erred in law and fact in imposing a Short Detention Order and Mandatory Treatment Order. |
30 Jun 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. |
29 Jun 2021 | Respondent | WonThe appeals by Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar and Nazeeha binte Abu Hasan were dismissed. |
29 Jun 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
23 Jun 2021 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against Mohamed Affandi, who was sentenced to 28 years' imprisonment. |
21 Jun 2021 | Prosecution | PartialCapital Charge not made out; convicted of amended charge of importing 0.97g of methamphetamine. |
21 Jun 2021 | Respondent | WonThe application for leave to review the appeal was dismissed summarily. |
20 Jun 2021 | Respondent | WonThe court found that the prosecution was not frivolous or vexatious and dismissed the application for compensation. |
09 Jun 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted under Section 300(c) of the Penal Code. |
08 Jun 2021 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the appeals, endorsing the Prosecution's proposed sentencing framework. |
02 Jun 2021 | Respondent | WonThe application for leave to make a review application was dismissed. |
01 Jun 2021 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
18 May 2021 | Prosecution | LostThe accused was acquitted, and the case was dismissed. |
17 May 2021 | Respondent, Plaintiff | WonThe court affirmed the finding that the appellant committed the act of causing the deceased's death. |
13 May 2021 | Respondent | WonCosts order of $5,000 in favour of the Public Prosecutor, to be paid by Mr. Ravi (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 May 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 28 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
10 May 2021 | Respondent | RemandedCase remitted to the State Courts for a re-trial to be conducted in respect of the Passport. |
10 May 2021 | Respondent | WonCosts of $2,000 awarded to the Prosecution (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
06 May 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty and sentenced to 27 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
04 May 2021 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original sentence. |
03 May 2021 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part; retrial ordered. |
22 Apr 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction and sentence. |
20 Apr 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Court dismissed the application to re-open the appeal. |
20 Apr 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and the mandatory 15 strokes of the cane. |
19 Apr 2021 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's application for review. |
08 Apr 2021 | Respondent | WonThe application for leave to make a review application was dismissed summarily. |
06 Apr 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
05 Apr 2021 | Respondent | WonThe original sentence of 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane was upheld. |
04 Apr 2021 | Respondent | WonThe application for review was dismissed. |
30 Mar 2021 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed. |
29 Mar 2021 | Respondent | NeutralThe respondent associated itself with the court's concerns regarding the jurisdictional basis of the application, which was subsequently withdrawn. |
29 Mar 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
29 Mar 2021 | Respondent | WonThe court upheld the confiscation order for $167,429.51 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
28 Mar 2021 | Respondent | WonThe court upheld the forfeiture order of the Prime South vessel. |
25 Mar 2021 | Appellant, Respondent | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the SDO sentence was dismissed. |
21 Mar 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of murder. |
17 Mar 2021 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully resisted the applications for production of statements. |
14 Mar 2021 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
07 Mar 2021 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's criminal motion. |
28 Feb 2021 | Plaintiff | WonAccused convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and the mandatory minimum of 15 strokes of the cane. |
25 Feb 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant. |
24 Feb 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused persons were found guilty of the respective charges. |
24 Feb 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Criminal Motion was dismissed summarily. |
23 Feb 2021 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case, securing a conviction against the defendant. |
18 Feb 2021 | Respondent | WonThe applicant's application for leave to make a review application was dismissed. |
14 Feb 2021 | Prosecution | WonKannan was found guilty as charged. |
01 Feb 2021 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction and sentence. |
01 Feb 2021 | Plaintiff | WonConfiscation order granted for $167,429.51, being the value of benefits derived by the Defendant from drug trafficking. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
31 Jan 2021 | Prosecution | LostThe court found that Roszaidi does not satisfy the requirements under s 33B(3)(b) of the MDA and, consequently, cannot avail himself of the alternative sentencing regime under s 33B(1)(b) of the MDA. |
25 Jan 2021 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved the charges against all three accused persons. |
24 Jan 2021 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the sentence was allowed. |
21 Jan 2021 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on both charges. |
17 Jan 2021 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for review. |
29 Dec 2020 | Respondent | WonThe court affirmed its original verdict of guilt. |
17 Dec 2020 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal on the charge against Pragas was allowed and he was acquitted of this charge. |
02 Dec 2020 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed. |
02 Dec 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced. |
01 Dec 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed. |
01 Dec 2020 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against sentence allowed in part. Sentence adjusted. |
26 Nov 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
22 Nov 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appeals by Muhammad Abdul Hadi bin Haron and Muhammad Salleh bin Hamid were dismissed. |
15 Nov 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
12 Nov 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
05 Nov 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the constitutionality of s 16(1)(a) of the Public Order Act. |
03 Nov 2020 | Respondent | NeutralThe original charge of aggravated outrage of modesty was amended to outrage of modesty simpliciter. |
02 Nov 2020 | Plaintiff | PartialThe Prosecution sought a finding that Kok Meng committed the act and prayed for an order under 252 of the CPC. The court made a finding that Kok Meng committed the act of causing Mr Tan’s death. |
29 Oct 2020 | Plaintiff | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway. |
29 Oct 2020 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentences imposed by the District Judge were increased. |
28 Oct 2020 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against the six months’ imprisonment sentence. |
27 Oct 2020 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 22 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
26 Oct 2020 | Appellant, Applicant | LostThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
18 Oct 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Ng Jia Jie was dismissed. |
18 Oct 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the application for review of sentence. |
18 Oct 2020 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was partially allowed as the conviction on the capital charge was set aside, but the conviction on the amended charge was reinstated. |
15 Oct 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the review application. |
12 Oct 2020 | Respondent | LostThe conviction against Beh Chew Boo was reversed. |
11 Oct 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for leave to review the earlier decision. |
30 Sep 2020 | Prosecution | WonAll three accused persons were convicted of their respective charges. |
28 Sep 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted and sentenced. |
22 Sep 2020 | Applicant | PartialSentence of imprisonment enhanced from eight months to 14 months. |
20 Sep 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the applications to overturn the convictions. |
16 Sep 2020 | Respondent | LostThe Court of Appeal allowed the application, setting aside the conviction and affirming the High Court's original acquittal. |
13 Sep 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe court upheld the original conviction of the accused. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
03 Sep 2020 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the conviction was allowed. |
25 Aug 2020 | Respondent | PartialMotion allowed, but no costs were ordered against the Prosecution. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
20 Aug 2020 | Applicant | NeutralTwo questions answered in the affirmative, one question not answered. |
18 Aug 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Applicant's application for extension of time was dismissed. |
11 Aug 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted BSY for rape. |
10 Aug 2020 | Plaintiff | PartialMurder charge reduced to grievous hurt with a dangerous weapon. |
29 Jul 2020 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, but the conviction was upheld on an amended charge. |
23 Jul 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction of the appellant. |
15 Jul 2020 | Respondent | WonThe sentences imposed by the High Court were upheld. |
15 Jul 2020 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Prosecution's appeals were allowed, and the sentences imposed by the District Judge were substituted with enhanced sentences. |
05 Jul 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
14 Jun 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused. |
10 Jun 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted. |
09 Jun 2020 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal against Dr. Wee's acquittal on the Rape Charge was dismissed. |
02 Jun 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the District Judge's sentence was dismissed, upholding the original sentence. |
02 Jun 2020 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on all nine charges. |
01 Jun 2020 | Respondent | WonMotion denied; no monetary amount awarded. |
21 May 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Muhammad Ikrimah, leading to a sentence of 27 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
19 May 2020 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased to 12 months' imprisonment. |
17 May 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the disqualification order was dismissed. |
14 May 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution proved the charge against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
07 May 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Rizwan's conviction and sentence. |
05 May 2020 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of murder under s 300(c) of the Penal Code. |
28 Apr 2020 | Respondent, Applicant | PartialConviction for Importation of Cannabis Mixture Charge set aside. |
26 Apr 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence. |
26 Apr 2020 | Appellant | WonThe appeal was allowed, and the respondent was sentenced to two weeks imprisonment. |
22 Apr 2020 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was partially dismissed as Azli's appeal was allowed. |
20 Apr 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
30 Mar 2020 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part. Conviction for trafficking in diamorphine set aside, substituted with conviction for possession. Conviction for trafficking in cannabis set aside. |
29 Mar 2020 | Respondent | WonThe Court dismissed the application by the applicant. |
25 Mar 2020 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended against both appeals. |
22 Mar 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed, upholding the original sentence. |
18 Mar 2020 | Appellant, Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the original sentence was dismissed. |
18 Mar 2020 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of murder under section 300(c) of the Penal Code. |
17 Mar 2020 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
09 Mar 2020 | Plaintiff | WonLokman was convicted on amended charges and Mubin was convicted on charges of abetment and trafficking. |
05 Mar 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by International Placements (S) Pte Ltd was dismissed. |
03 Mar 2020 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and convicted on four charges of rape and two charges of sexual assault by penetration. |
02 Mar 2020 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by the appellant was dismissed. |
27 Feb 2020 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction of the Appellants, but the sentence was reduced on appeal. |
27 Feb 2020 | Respondent | LostThe Court of Appeal overturned the original conviction. |
18 Feb 2020 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
17 Feb 2020 | Respondent | PartialAppeal dismissed in part; convictions and sentences for the first four charges set aside. Appeal against conviction and sentence in respect of the fifth charge dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
16 Feb 2020 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of importing methamphetamine and sentenced to death. |
11 Feb 2020 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, setting aside the acquittal of the respondent. |
02 Feb 2020 | Respondent | WonThe order allowing the CAD to retain the seized funds for the purposes of investigations was sustained. |
29 Jan 2020 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence allowed in part. Aggregate sentence reduced from 39 months to 32 months. |
21 Jan 2020 | Respondent, Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
12 Jan 2020 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on three charges. |
09 Jan 2020 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused were found guilty. |
07 Jan 2020 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the original sentence was substituted with a lighter sentence. |
03 Dec 2019 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence of reformative training. |
01 Dec 2019 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended against the petitioner's application for criminal revision. |
27 Nov 2019 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Mohd Akebal was dismissed. |
24 Nov 2019 | Prosecution | PartialThe Prosecution sought a sentence of at least two years’ imprisonment and an order that the accused person be disqualified from driving for at least 12 years. The court imposed a sentence of one year imprisonment and a disqualification from driving for 12 years. |
24 Nov 2019 | Respondent, Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of Zuraimy on the original trafficking charge was dismissed. |
24 Nov 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to three years’ and three months’ imprisonment. |
18 Nov 2019 | Respondent | PartialThe court rejected the argument that the decision to stand down charges is a matter purely within the Prosecution’s discretion. |
13 Nov 2019 | Prosecution | PartialSome statements made by the accused were ruled inadmissible due to doubts about their voluntariness. |
12 Nov 2019 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against BPH's appeal. |
07 Nov 2019 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; sentence enhanced for abuse of process. |
03 Nov 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment. |
29 Oct 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to seven years' imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Oct 2019 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
23 Oct 2019 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; original sentence overturned (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
16 Oct 2019 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially successful in reducing the sentence and disqualification period. |
14 Oct 2019 | Prosecution | WonAll accused persons were convicted. |
29 Sep 2019 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court clarified the scope of litigation privilege for the prosecution and the approach to cross-examination. |
29 Sep 2019 | Respondent, Appellant | NeutralThe court will hear the parties before giving further directions. |
26 Sep 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
26 Sep 2019 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialProsecution's appeal against the sentence for the charge under Section 323 of the Penal Code was allowed. |
23 Sep 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of importing diamorphine. |
19 Sep 2019 | Respondent, Appellant | LostThe court declined to exercise its powers to make further directions in relation to compensation or to consider if any other orders should be made under s 360(1) of the CPC. |
17 Sep 2019 | Respondent | WonOriginal sentence of 29 months’ imprisonment upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
16 Sep 2019 | Plaintiff | WonThe defendant was convicted of murder. |
09 Sep 2019 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld as the appeal was dismissed. |
08 Sep 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
05 Sep 2019 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialProsecution's appeal against Kaur's sentences allowed. |
29 Aug 2019 | Prosecution | PartialAccused acquitted on rape charge, but convicted of sexual assault by penetration and outrage of modesty. |
27 Aug 2019 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction dismissed, appeal against sentence allowed. |
26 Aug 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted and the mandatory death penalty was imposed. |
18 Aug 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully secured convictions and sentences for all accused persons on various charges. |
13 Aug 2019 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
07 Aug 2019 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the High Court's decision to acquit the respondent was dismissed. |
04 Aug 2019 | Applicant | PartialHigh Court's acquittal of the respondent set aside; case remitted to the Judge. |
29 Jul 2019 | Respondent | PartialThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part, substituting the conviction to one under section 300(c) of the Penal Code and sentencing Chan to life imprisonment. |
25 Jul 2019 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence imposed by the District Judge was dismissed. |
18 Jul 2019 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant. |
15 Jul 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe court ordered sentences for the 24th, 47th and 50th charges to run consecutively, resulting in an aggregate sentence of 310 months (25.8 years) imprisonment, with the remaining sentences to run concurrently. |
11 Jul 2019 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against sentence was dismissed. |
08 Jul 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured convictions against all three accused individuals. |
04 Jul 2019 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court made findings on the terms of reference remitted by the Court of Appeal. |
01 Jul 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe accused were convicted and sentenced to death. |
27 Jun 2019 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed. |
27 Jun 2019 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original decision. |
25 Jun 2019 | Respondent, Applicant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
12 Jun 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
11 Jun 2019 | Appellant, Respondent | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the District Judge’s dismissal of its application for payment of arrears in contributions and interest under s 61B(1) CPFA was dismissed. |
05 Jun 2019 | Respondent, Appellant | WonProsecution's appeal against sentence was allowed, enhancing the sentence imposed to four months’ imprisonment. |
26 May 2019 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the conviction was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted. |
23 May 2019 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
20 May 2019 | Respondent | PartialThe High Court reduced the sentence for unlawful stalking but upheld the conviction and the sentence for theft. |
16 May 2019 | Respondent | WonThe Respondent successfully opposed the Criminal Motion, which was dismissed. |
08 May 2019 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's bail application. |
07 May 2019 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the community-based sentences was allowed. |
02 May 2019 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's application for an extension of time. |
24 Apr 2019 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence of imprisonment was overturned on appeal. |
22 Apr 2019 | Prosecution | PartialConviction of two of the three accused persons on some of the charges. |
22 Apr 2019 | Applicant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was dismissed. |
16 Apr 2019 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended the appeal. |
10 Apr 2019 | Appellant, Respondent | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
09 Apr 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of drug trafficking. |
07 Apr 2019 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; convictions of the applicants were quashed. |
02 Apr 2019 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution’s appeal against sentence was dismissed entirely. |
25 Mar 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane. |
19 Mar 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of the charge. |
18 Mar 2019 | Respondent | WonThe additional evidence would have no effect on the court's verdict. |
14 Mar 2019 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part for Ramesh, and his conviction was amended to possession simpliciter. |
14 Mar 2019 | Prosecution | WonConviction on all 50 charges. |
14 Mar 2019 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully opposed the criminal motion regarding the recall of witnesses. |
13 Mar 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted of the charge. |
28 Feb 2019 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; the order for continued seizure of property was overturned. |
27 Feb 2019 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's position to uphold the original sentence was partially dismissed, as the appeal was allowed in part (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
27 Feb 2019 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of both charges of rape. |
26 Feb 2019 | Prosecution | PartialConviction of Andi Ashwar and Mohd Akebal as charged. Conviction of Mohammed Rusli Bin Abdul Rahman on amended charge. |
26 Feb 2019 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, overturning the initial conviction. |
21 Feb 2019 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
17 Feb 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced. |
14 Feb 2019 | Prosecution | WonMoad Fadzir was found guilty as charged. |
12 Feb 2019 | Respondent | PartialAppeal partially unsuccessful; caning sentence set aside for the OM offence, and imprisonment sentence substituted with a fine for the s 509 offence (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 Feb 2019 | Appellant, Respondent | WonAppeals against conviction dismissed. |
10 Feb 2019 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
10 Feb 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt against Azwan as charged. |
06 Feb 2019 | Respondent | WonThe original sentence of two weeks' imprisonment was upheld. |
06 Feb 2019 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed and the conviction was overturned. |
27 Jan 2019 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted the accused. |
27 Jan 2019 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused was found guilty on the amended charge of possessing not less than 14.99g of diamorphine. |
23 Jan 2019 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed and the original sentence was overturned. |
20 Jan 2019 | Prosecution | WonAishamudin was found guilty of trafficking diamorphine. |
20 Jan 2019 | Respondent | WonOriginal judgment affirmed; appeal dismissed. |
13 Jan 2019 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, but the appeal against the sentence was allowed, reducing the fine from $200,000 to $160,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
06 Jan 2019 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal answered the question in the negative and affirmed the convictions. |
30 Dec 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and convicted of the charge. |
05 Dec 2018 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's original sentencing was partially dismissed as the appeal was allowed and the sentence was reduced. |
04 Dec 2018 | Respondent | LostThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction. |
02 Dec 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on both charges. |
29 Nov 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted the defendant. |
27 Nov 2018 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was reduced. |
22 Nov 2018 | Respondent | LostThe applicant's criminal revision was allowed, and the conviction was set aside. |
18 Nov 2018 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed by the District Judge. |
14 Nov 2018 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed. |
08 Nov 2018 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
01 Nov 2018 | Respondent, Appellant | WonCross-appeal against sentence allowed; sentence enhanced to 25 weeks' imprisonment. |
01 Nov 2018 | Appellant | WonAppeal against sentence allowed; original sentence of four weeks' imprisonment substituted with two months' imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
28 Oct 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both Lingkesvaran Rajendaren and Alfian bin Abdul Rahim on charges of drug trafficking. |
24 Oct 2018 | Appellant | WonThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and found the respondent guilty on the original charge. |
24 Oct 2018 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's criminal motion. |
21 Oct 2018 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on the capital charge. |
07 Oct 2018 | Respondent, Appellant | WonAppeals against sentences allowed; sentences increased for all respondents. |
04 Oct 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both accused on charges under the Misuse of Drugs Act. |
04 Oct 2018 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
02 Oct 2018 | Respondent | RemandedThe case was remanded for retrial before another High Court judge. |
02 Oct 2018 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions of Zainal and Rahmat. |
27 Sep 2018 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; the original fine was replaced with a 5-week imprisonment sentence (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
13 Sep 2018 | Prosecution | WonSaridewi was sentenced to the mandatory death penalty, and Haikal was sentenced to life imprisonment with 15 strokes of the cane. |
12 Sep 2018 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's request for imprisonment was not granted. |
02 Sep 2018 | Respondent | PartialAppeal partially successful; sentence reduced but conviction upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
02 Sep 2018 | Respondent, Applicant | WonThe Prosecution's application to admit the Affidavit as additional evidence in CM 12 was granted. |
15 Aug 2018 | Appellant | PartialThe prosecution's appeal was allowed in part, and the sentence for the first charge was increased to six months' imprisonment. |
05 Aug 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
05 Aug 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted of drug trafficking. |
01 Aug 2018 | Respondent | NeutralAppeal adjourned to an early date to be fixed, such date not to be before 16 August 2018. |
31 Jul 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty. |
29 Jul 2018 | Respondent | PartialAggregate sentence reduced to 19 years’ imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane. |
15 Jul 2018 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant. |
15 Jul 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured convictions against all three accused individuals. |
01 Jul 2018 | Respondent | WonThe application for an extension of time was dismissed. |
28 Jun 2018 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's case for reformative training was not upheld on appeal. |
28 Jun 2018 | Appellant | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed in part, with adjustments made to the sentences for the various charges. |
26 Jun 2018 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence of life imprisonment was substituted with the death sentence. |
26 Jun 2018 | Appellant | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed in part, with the High Court's sentence of two years' imprisonment enhanced to six years' imprisonment. |
25 Jun 2018 | Appellant | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed in part, with the sentences ordered to run consecutively, resulting in an aggregate sentence of four and a half years' imprisonment and nine strokes of the cane. |
25 Jun 2018 | Appellant | WonThe appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
07 Jun 2018 | Prosecution | WonSentence of 20 years and 6 months’ imprisonment, and 15 strokes of the cane imposed on the Accused. |
07 Jun 2018 | Respondent, Appellant | LostThe court dismissed the Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence. |
03 Jun 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Accused was sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment and six strokes of the cane. |
03 Jun 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on all charges. |
31 May 2018 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
20 May 2018 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of all seven charges. |
13 May 2018 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and a disqualification order was issued against the respondent. |
10 May 2018 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on 2nd to 6th charges and 8th to 12th charges (including the 7th charge in its amended form). |
10 May 2018 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, resulting in a reduced sentence for the appellant. |
07 May 2018 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal for compensation was partially allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
02 May 2018 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed. |
26 Apr 2018 | Prosecution | Won |
25 Apr 2018 | Prosecution | WonSentences of imprisonment and caning were imposed on all three accused persons. |
24 Apr 2018 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence of a fine was allowed, and a sentence of one week's imprisonment was imposed. The fine will be refunded. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
23 Apr 2018 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court determined the sentences for both Nimalan and Theyagarajan. |
19 Apr 2018 | Prosecution | OtherThe Prosecution has appealed against the decision to sentence the Accused to Reformative Training. |
18 Apr 2018 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; the conviction of the Appellant was overturned. |
16 Apr 2018 | Prosecution | WonBMR was sentenced to 14 years of imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for each of the 4th, 5th, and 6th charges (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
05 Apr 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused persons on charges of possessing diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking. |
27 Mar 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Accused was found guilty on all charges. |
26 Mar 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and convicted on the charge of trafficking diamorphine. |
21 Mar 2018 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
20 Mar 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused. |
20 Mar 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Mangalagiri Dhruva Kumar for drug trafficking. |
18 Mar 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused. |
15 Mar 2018 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on both charges and ordered to pay compensation of $76 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
14 Mar 2018 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's criminal motion. |
05 Mar 2018 | Prosecution | Won |
04 Mar 2018 | Respondent | WonConviction and sentence upheld. |
01 Mar 2018 | Respondent, Appellant | PartialAppeal against sentence allowed in part for Tay Wee Kiat, but dismissed for Chia Yun Ling. |
28 Feb 2018 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the probation order was allowed. |
13 Feb 2018 | Applicant | PartialThe Prosecution's application to admit the affidavits of Matin, Superintendent Chua, and Assistant Superintendent Jaga was dismissed. The application to admit the evidence of Ms. Ng was allowed in part. Ms. Ng's affidavit, section 7, and paragraphs 5.3.4 and 5.5 of the expert report are admitted as further evidence in this appeal. |
13 Feb 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Accused was convicted on the charge of attempted murder. |
11 Feb 2018 | Respondent | WonThe High Court’s decision to pass the sentence of death on the Appellant was upheld. |
11 Feb 2018 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, overturning the conviction. |
29 Jan 2018 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on two charges of trafficking in cannabis and cannabis mixture. |
28 Jan 2018 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
24 Jan 2018 | Respondent | WonThe original sentence of one week's imprisonment was upheld. |
18 Jan 2018 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's position was partially upheld, as the appeal was allowed only in part and the conviction was maintained. |
11 Jan 2018 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted the accused on both charges. |
10 Jan 2018 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
03 Jan 2018 | Respondent | PartialAppeal partially unsuccessful; sentence for Enhanced Possession Charge reduced, sentence of 12 weeks’ imprisonment in lieu of caning set aside, sentence for LT-2 Charge affirmed. |
01 Jan 2018 | Prosecution | WonBoth defendants convicted and sentenced to death. |
28 Dec 2017 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence of reformative training was dismissed, and the sentence was substituted with probation. |
07 Dec 2017 | Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
06 Dec 2017 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed by the District Court. |
30 Nov 2017 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence for the first charge was dismissed, but the appeal against the sentence for the second charge was allowed. The original sentence imposed for the second charge of a fine of SGD 5,000 is substituted with a three-week imprisonment term. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
28 Nov 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to 18 years' imprisonment. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) |
28 Nov 2017 | Appellant, Applicant | WonThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased to ten weeks' imprisonment. |
27 Nov 2017 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was upheld, and the applicant was deemed ineligible for reformative training. |
21 Nov 2017 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the disqualification order. |
20 Nov 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty. |
14 Nov 2017 | Respondent, Appellant | WonProsecution's cross-appeal against sentence was allowed, and the appellant's imprisonment term was increased. |
13 Nov 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved all charges against both accused persons beyond a reasonable doubt. |
12 Nov 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 24 years' imprisonment and 20 strokes of the cane. |
12 Nov 2017 | Respondent | WonApplications for re-sentencing dismissed. |
08 Nov 2017 | Respondent | WonThe application for stay of execution was dismissed. |
22 Oct 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted on both charges. |
15 Oct 2017 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor sought a sentence of nine years’ imprisonment, but the court imposed a sentence of two years’ imprisonment. |
12 Oct 2017 | Respondent | OtherThe Public Prosecutor's proposed sentencing framework was not adopted by the court. |
12 Oct 2017 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction. |
10 Oct 2017 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal dismissed the application. |
05 Oct 2017 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent's imprisonment term was enhanced. |
03 Oct 2017 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's opposition to the appeal was unsuccessful (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
28 Sep 2017 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
26 Sep 2017 | Respondent | WonThe forfeiture order for the seized funds was upheld. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore. |
25 Sep 2017 | Prosecution | PartialThe prosecution succeeded in convicting both accused on some charges but not all. |
25 Sep 2017 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed and the original judgment was upheld. |
24 Sep 2017 | Respondent | PartialConviction affirmed. Sentence for rape affirmed; sentence for digital penetration reduced. |
20 Sep 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against all three accused persons. |
20 Sep 2017 | Prosecution | PartialConviction of both accused, but different sentences imposed. |
14 Sep 2017 | Applicant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the sentences imposed by the District Judge were set aside. |
13 Sep 2017 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
13 Sep 2017 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the initial sentence of imprisonment was replaced with a fine of $35,000 (Singapore Dollars). |
05 Sep 2017 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's criminal motion. |
29 Aug 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
28 Aug 2017 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence enhancement was dismissed. |
27 Aug 2017 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the Respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
20 Aug 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of murder. |
16 Aug 2017 | Respondent, Appellant | PartialAppeal against sentence dismissed in part; individual sentences varied, aggregate sentence remains. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
01 Aug 2017 | Respondent | PartialThe court allowed the motion in part, ordering a review of its previous decision and remitting the matter to the trial judge to receive further evidence related to the psychiatric report. |
30 Jul 2017 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Prosecution’s appeal against acquittal on the first charge was allowed, and the sentences were increased. |
30 Jul 2017 | Respondent | LostThe Prosecution's application to temporarily stay the orders which I had made should be dismissed, and that the orders were to be carried out with immediate effect. |
27 Jul 2017 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially successful, resulting in a reduced imprisonment sentence for the appellant. |
23 Jul 2017 | Appellant, Applicant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeals against the sentences imposed on the respondents were allowed, and the sentences were enhanced. |
20 Jul 2017 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the District Judge’s sentence was allowed, and the imprisonment term was enhanced. |
20 Jul 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment with 15 strokes of the cane. |
19 Jul 2017 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the Respondent's sentence was changed from probation to imprisonment. |
16 Jul 2017 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's argument for a 12-month imprisonment sentence was rejected. |
13 Jul 2017 | Appellant | WonThe High Court allowed the appeal. |
13 Jul 2017 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed, and the convictions for the Conspiracy Charges were set aside. Liew was convicted on reduced charges. |
09 Jul 2017 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part; original conviction set aside, but appellant convicted of a lesser charge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
05 Jul 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused Ng Peng Chong and Cheng Pueh Kuang were convicted on drug charges. |
03 Jul 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all ten charges. |
02 Jul 2017 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
27 Jun 2017 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused persons were found guilty as charged. |
27 Jun 2017 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused was convicted on a reduced charge. |
26 Jun 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty of the charge against him. |
18 Jun 2017 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal affirmed the High Court's decision on conviction and sentence. |
31 May 2017 | Plaintiff, Applicant | PartialOrders granted for restraint of specific bank accounts and charging orders on properties. |
31 May 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
30 May 2017 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was reduced. |
25 May 2017 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittals was allowed. |
25 May 2017 | Respondent, Appellant | WonAppeal against sentence allowed; sentence increased. |
24 May 2017 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, resulting in a custodial sentence for the respondent. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
23 May 2017 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; aggregate imprisonment term enhanced from 14 months to 16 months. |
18 May 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on the first, second, third and sixth charges. |
14 May 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of importing cannabis and cannabis mixture. |
11 May 2017 | Respondent | PartialAppeal dismissed in respect of the MCRBA Charge. |
10 May 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on the charge he faced. |
10 May 2017 | Plaintiff | WonAccused was convicted and sentenced. |
02 May 2017 | Prosecution | WonNg and Cheng were convicted on the amended charge of joint possession of 10.17g of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking. |
02 May 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on Charge B1 and sentenced to death. Charge B2 withdrawn. |
25 Apr 2017 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's imprisonment term was increased. |
24 Apr 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on the charge. |
19 Apr 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution proved the charge against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
11 Apr 2017 | Prosecution | LostThe prosecution failed to prove any of the five charges against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
06 Apr 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe defendants were found guilty on all charges. |
04 Apr 2017 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction dismissed. |
03 Apr 2017 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the original sentence. |
02 Apr 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe accused persons were sentenced to the mandatory minimum sentence. |
29 Mar 2017 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed, and the sentence was reduced. |
29 Mar 2017 | Appellant | WonThe appeal was allowed, and the respondents were convicted of the charges. |
13 Mar 2017 | Plaintiff | WonThe accused was convicted and sentenced. |
12 Mar 2017 | Respondent | LostThe Magistrate's Order to extend the seizure of funds was set aside. |
09 Mar 2017 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was dismissed. |
09 Mar 2017 | Respondent | LostAppeal against the sentence was allowed. |
09 Mar 2017 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against conviction and sentence. |
06 Mar 2017 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against acquittal was allowed. |
28 Feb 2017 | Respondent, Appellant | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed to the extent of enhancing the sentences for the criminal conspiracy charges to 24 months’ imprisonment. |
26 Feb 2017 | Respondent, Appellant | LostAppeal against Tony Anak Imba's sentence dismissed. |
23 Feb 2017 | Respondent | PartialThe original sentence was reduced, but the penalty of $1,500 remained. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
23 Feb 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to an aggregate sentence of 22 years and three months. |
21 Feb 2017 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and caning. |
16 Feb 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe prosecution successfully proved its case beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the conviction of both accused. |
14 Feb 2017 | Respondent | WonThe conviction and sentence of the Appellant were upheld. |
09 Feb 2017 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
09 Feb 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution succeeded in proving all the elements of the Charge against the Accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
02 Feb 2017 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction of murder was dismissed. |
25 Jan 2017 | Respondent | WonThe High Court upheld the District Judge's decision to forfeit the entire bond amount of $60,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
22 Jan 2017 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the original sentence. |
16 Jan 2017 | Prosecution | WonChia Kee Chen was found guilty of murder. |
11 Jan 2017 | Respondent | WonAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed; mandatory death sentences upheld. |
05 Jan 2017 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the Judge's decision to set aside the convictions under s 376A(1)(b) was reversed. |
05 Jan 2017 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on nine charges and sentenced to imprisonment and caning. |
29 Dec 2016 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the convictions and sentences imposed by the trial judge. |
28 Dec 2016 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the sentence was allowed. |
27 Dec 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted on all charges. |
14 Dec 2016 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; the fine was increased to $250,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
08 Dec 2016 | Respondent | LostThe application was allowed, and the conviction and sentence imposed on the applicant were set aside. |
07 Dec 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
30 Nov 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and convicted. |
20 Nov 2016 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by the defendant was dismissed. |
17 Nov 2016 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the four weeks’ imprisonment term was dismissed. |
17 Nov 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced. |
16 Nov 2016 | Respondent | WonThe application for stay of execution and setting aside death sentence was dismissed. |
01 Nov 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Zainudin and Shanti for drug trafficking offences. |
27 Oct 2016 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Seng Foo Building Construction Pte Ltd was dismissed. |
27 Oct 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on all three charges: rape, sexual assault by penetration, and personating a public servant. |
19 Oct 2016 | Prosecution | WonAll three accused were found guilty as charged. |
19 Oct 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of drug trafficking. |
19 Oct 2016 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against conviction was allowed, and the appellant was acquitted and discharged. |
16 Oct 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
13 Oct 2016 | Respondent, Appellant | NeutralThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence imposed by the Judge on the rape charge was dismissed. |
10 Oct 2016 | Respondent | LostCriminal revision allowed. Disclosure Order set aside; retrial ordered before a different district judge. |
09 Oct 2016 | Prosecution | OtherThe Public Prosecutor filed a Notice of Appeal against the sentence. |
05 Oct 2016 | Prosecution | PartialOne defendant received the death penalty, while the other received life imprisonment. |
04 Oct 2016 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was set aside. |
02 Oct 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 11 years and 19 days’ imprisonment and six strokes of the cane for each of the two offences, sentences to run concurrently. |
28 Sep 2016 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's position was partially rejected as the court allowed Sim's appeal. |
21 Sep 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 16 years, 10 months and 2 weeks’ imprisonment, and 22 strokes of the cane. |
21 Sep 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty. |
15 Sep 2016 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor sought a sentence of 20 years, but the court imposed a sentence of 18 years. |
12 Sep 2016 | Respondent | LostAppeal lost; appellant ordered to undergo 12 months MTO and fines paid to be refunded in full (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
08 Sep 2016 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence of 12 weeks' imprisonment was dismissed. |
08 Sep 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. |
07 Sep 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of both charges of rape. |
07 Sep 2016 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; original sentence set aside (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
30 Aug 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 23 years imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
28 Aug 2016 | Respondent | PartialThe prosecution's appeal was partially lost as the original charge was altered and a lesser sentence was imposed. |
24 Aug 2016 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the sentence of probation was allowed, and the respondent was sentenced to reformative training. |
21 Aug 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane. |
18 Aug 2016 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed and the term of imprisonment was reduced from 7 years to 4.5 years. |
07 Aug 2016 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially allowed, and the sentence was reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
07 Aug 2016 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentences imposed by the District Judge were altered. |
04 Aug 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 16½ years of imprisonment and 18 strokes of the cane. |
03 Aug 2016 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed by the District Judge. |
28 Jul 2016 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's cross-appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
28 Jul 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution succeeded in proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the Accused committed the offence of importation of a controlled drug. |
20 Jul 2016 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially successful, with the sentence reduced. |
17 Jul 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on both charges. |
12 Jul 2016 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal denied the applicant's application for leave to refer questions of law. |
11 Jul 2016 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the original sentence was dismissed. |
03 Jul 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution proved the charge against Zaini beyond a reasonable doubt. |
03 Jul 2016 | Prosecution | WonAgbozo Billy was found guilty as charged. |
30 Jun 2016 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's sentence. |
29 Jun 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of drug trafficking. |
31 May 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted all three accused persons. |
25 May 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
23 May 2016 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the Respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
22 May 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both accused persons on charges of drug trafficking. |
18 May 2016 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended against the applicant's motion to set aside the sentence of death. |
15 May 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted. |
12 May 2016 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant. |
09 May 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved its case against both accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
08 May 2016 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's motion to reopen the criminal appeal. |
04 May 2016 | Appellant | WonThe appeal was allowed, the order of acquittal was set aside, and the case was remitted to the District Judge for the defence to be called. |
27 Apr 2016 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the Respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
21 Apr 2016 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's contention that the applicant did not meet the second condition of s 33B(3) of the MDA was not successful. |
20 Apr 2016 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the Respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
19 Apr 2016 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the aggregate sentence was reduced from 14 months to 9 months. |
18 Apr 2016 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused was not found guilty of murder, but was found guilty of culpable homicide. |
14 Apr 2016 | Respondent | WonThe High Court upheld the sentences imposed by the District Court. |
14 Apr 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 23 years’ imprisonment, including 12 months in lieu of caning. |
12 Apr 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment. |
11 Apr 2016 | Prosecution | PartialLost on charges under section 376A(1)(b) of the Penal Code, but secured a conviction under s 7 CYPA. |
10 Apr 2016 | Appellant | Lost |
06 Apr 2016 | Prosecution | Won |
05 Apr 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on both charges. |
04 Apr 2016 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the Prosecution's appeal and maintained the death sentence. |
03 Apr 2016 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment and caning. No monetary amount was awarded. |
30 Mar 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. |
10 Mar 2016 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the acquittal was allowed, and a re-trial was ordered. |
10 Mar 2016 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the Respondent's acquittal on all 11 charges was allowed. |
06 Mar 2016 | Prosecution | NeutralThe Public Prosecutor certified that Chum had rendered substantive assistance, and did not argue for the death penalty to be imposed. |
25 Feb 2016 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor agreed to the revision of the convictions on the Disputed Charges and the substitution with reduced charges. |
25 Feb 2016 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, overturning the original sentence. |
23 Feb 2016 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence. |
17 Feb 2016 | Appellant | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the court ordering the further term of imprisonment to start at the end of the existing 12-year imprisonment sentence, but reducing it to two years. |
10 Feb 2016 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
25 Jan 2016 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Mohd Suief bin Ismail was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
25 Jan 2016 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt on the trafficking charge. |
19 Jan 2016 | Respondent, Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal for a higher sentence was dismissed. |
13 Jan 2016 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction and sentence. |
06 Dec 2015 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
03 Dec 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on both charges of murder under section 300(a) of the Penal Code. |
02 Dec 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
29 Nov 2015 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and mandatory death sentence. |
29 Nov 2015 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal dismissed the application. |
23 Nov 2015 | Applicant | NeutralThe Public Prosecutor sought clarification on three questions of law. The court provided guidance on these issues. |
12 Nov 2015 | Applicant | WonThe Prosecution's motion for an extension of time to file its Petition of Appeal was allowed. |
05 Nov 2015 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of culpable homicide. |
03 Nov 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured a guilty verdict against both accused. |
02 Nov 2015 | Respondent | LostAppeal lost; imprisonment sentence substituted with a fine of $5,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
02 Nov 2015 | Respondent | WonThe application for re-sentencing was dismissed, and the original death sentence was upheld. |
26 Oct 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted under s 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act. |
25 Oct 2015 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the district judge's order of probation was substituted with a sentence of reformative training. |
25 Oct 2015 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially dismissed, with the sentences for the seventh and eighth charges remaining unchanged. |
15 Oct 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Hamidah Binte Awang. |
13 Oct 2015 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was reduced. |
05 Oct 2015 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
28 Sep 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of importing a Class A controlled drug. |
24 Sep 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe prosecution's appeal against the sentences was allowed, and the sentences were increased. |
24 Sep 2015 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's fine was increased from $20,000 to $35,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
13 Sep 2015 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment and caning. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
01 Sep 2015 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused were convicted and sentenced to death. |
27 Aug 2015 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor initially sought a custodial sentence, but later did not oppose the appeal for a fine (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Aug 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of both rape and robbery. |
19 Aug 2015 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, and the sentence on the trafficking charge was reduced. |
13 Aug 2015 | Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal against the District Judge's decision was dismissed. |
02 Aug 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully convicted both accused persons on the charge of drug trafficking. |
02 Aug 2015 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was set aside. |
29 Jul 2015 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution’s appeals against the sentences imposed on the Respondents were dismissed. |
28 Jul 2015 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's original sentencing was deemed manifestly excessive and reduced. |
26 Jul 2015 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty as charged. |
23 Jul 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
19 Jul 2015 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
15 Jul 2015 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially successful as the imprisonment terms for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges were replaced with an imprisonment term of four months for each of these three Proceeded Charges. The imprisonment terms for the Third Proceeded Charge and the Fifth Proceeded Charge are to run consecutively, making a total imprisonment term of eight months for the Third to the Fifth Proceeded Charges. The fines imposed by the Sentencing Judge for all five Proceeded Charges as well as the default imprisonment terms in respect of those fines were upheld. |
13 Jul 2015 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; original sentence overturned. |
12 Jul 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
28 Jun 2015 | Appellant | WonThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and convicted the Respondent on the charge preferred against him. |
25 Jun 2015 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for the first charge and to 1 year’s imprisonment in respect of the second charge. Both imprisonment terms to run consecutively. |
24 Jun 2015 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 17 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
24 Jun 2015 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 14 years’ imprisonment and 14 strokes of the cane. |
10 Jun 2015 | Respondent | NeutralCross-appeal against sentence dismissed. |
08 Jun 2015 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court maintained its finding that the accused was only a courier. |
04 Jun 2015 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the respondent's acquittal was allowed. |
18 May 2015 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence was allowed and the sentence was reduced. |
07 May 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured the conviction of both accused persons on charges of drug trafficking. |
04 May 2015 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence for importing diamorphine. |
28 Apr 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured a conviction against both accused persons. |
27 Apr 2015 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
19 Apr 2015 | Prosecution | PartialDeath penalty imposed on Micheal Anak Garing, but not on Tony Anak Imba. |
14 Apr 2015 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the sentence for the penile-vaginal penetration charge was enhanced. |
09 Apr 2015 | Applicant | LostThe Court of Appeal declined to answer the reframed question and dismissed the application. |
05 Apr 2015 | Respondent, Appellant | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal on the second charge was successful. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction. |
29 Mar 2015 | Applicant | RemandedThe matter was remitted to the State Courts for reconsideration of the prosecution’s application for revocation of bail in light of the principles set out and the observations made by the Court of Appeal. |
23 Mar 2015 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe High Court allowed the Public Prosecutor's cross-appeal on the second charge. |
19 Mar 2015 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
16 Mar 2015 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on the charge of drug trafficking. |
15 Mar 2015 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence of probation was allowed, and the sentence was substituted with a term of imprisonment. |
12 Mar 2015 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part; conviction under s 408 of the Penal Code set aside and substituted with a conviction under s 406. Sentence reduced to 14 months' imprisonment. |
10 Mar 2015 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed. |
03 Mar 2015 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
12 Feb 2015 | Respondent | WonProsecution's cross-appeal allowed; original charge reinstated. |
10 Feb 2015 | Respondent | PartialThe High Court upheld the conviction on both charges. The appeal against sentence was partially upheld, with the imprisonment term reduced for the s 66 RTA offence but the fine for the s 337(a) Penal Code offence remaining. |
10 Feb 2015 | Respondent | WonThe District Court's decision to impose a term of imprisonment of five years and two months and to order three strokes of the cane was affirmed. |
10 Feb 2015 | Respondent | NeutralThe court answered the questions of law referred against the Public Prosecutor. |
02 Feb 2015 | Prosecution | PartialOne defendant sentenced to death, the other to life imprisonment. |
01 Feb 2015 | Respondent | WonThe Respondent successfully opposed the Applicant's motion for bail pending appeal. |
01 Feb 2015 | Respondent | LostThe application for bail was granted. |
29 Jan 2015 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially dismissed as the sentence for the TMA charge was reduced, but the sentences for the rest of the proceeded charges remained unchanged. |
28 Jan 2015 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the application to set aside the death sentence. |
15 Jan 2015 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe prosecution's cross-appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
13 Jan 2015 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the death penalty was imposed on the Respondent. |
07 Jan 2015 | Prosecution | PartialHamidah Binte Awang was convicted for attempting to export not less than 1963.3g of methamphetamine. |
07 Jan 2015 | Applicant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's application for revision was allowed. |
22 Dec 2014 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, and the sentence was reduced. |
21 Dec 2014 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially denied, with the court reducing the term of imprisonment but affirming the fine and ineligibility for probation. |
21 Dec 2014 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
18 Dec 2014 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was overturned. |
17 Dec 2014 | Applicant | PartialThe prosecution's application to set aside the fine was allowed, but the court also suggested a review of the 'show cause' procedure. |
27 Nov 2014 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty as charged. |
27 Nov 2014 | Applicant | RemandedThe cases concerning Abdul Kahar and Chum were remitted to the Judge, who shall determine whether Abdul Kahar’s and Chum’s involvement in the offences under ss 5(1) and 7 of the MDA respectively was restricted to the activities under ss 33B(2)(a) and 33B(3)(a). |
27 Nov 2014 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the Accused on the 1st and 2nd Charges of the murder offences was allowed. |
18 Nov 2014 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's preliminary objection was upheld, preventing the trial judge from referring questions of law to the High Court during the trial. |
12 Nov 2014 | Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
09 Nov 2014 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced. |
05 Nov 2014 | Applicant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's application for criminal revision was dismissed by the High Court. |
02 Nov 2014 | Plaintiff | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
27 Oct 2014 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution successfully proved its case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
27 Oct 2014 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, resulting in a reduced sentence for the appellant. |
26 Oct 2014 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed to the extent that the conviction of an offence punishable under Section 325 of the Penal Code was set aside, but the charge was amended to one of voluntarily causing hurt simpliciter, punishable under Section 323 of the Penal Code. |
16 Oct 2014 | Applicant | Unknown |
16 Oct 2014 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence of 20 years' imprisonment was affirmed by the Court of Appeal. |
02 Oct 2014 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed. |
28 Sep 2014 | Respondent | WonThe court affirmed the sentence of death imposed on the applicant. |
24 Sep 2014 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's original sentencing request was partially overturned. |
16 Sep 2014 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty as charged. |
04 Sep 2014 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against sentence was dismissed as the convictions for the fourteen charges do not stand. |
03 Sep 2014 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, overturning the conviction. |
01 Sep 2014 | Appellant | WonThe appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was varied to four weeks' imprisonment. |
26 Aug 2014 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence was overturned. |
26 Aug 2014 | Appellant | PartialThe court answered the question in the negative, holding that it is not necessary for the Prosecution to prove that the consideration was inadequate or that the transaction was a sham before an offence under s 6 of the Act is made out. |
26 Aug 2014 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the aggregate sentence of eight months’ imprisonment was dismissed, but its appeal against the District Judge’s decision not to order a penalty under s 13(2) was allowed. The Accused was ordered to pay a sum of $6,500 as a penalty under s 13(2). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
30 Jul 2014 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the disqualification order was dismissed. |
24 Jul 2014 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and sentenced. |
24 Jul 2014 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, and the fines were reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
14 Jul 2014 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
13 Jul 2014 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
09 Jul 2014 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant for dishonestly receiving stolen property was upheld. |
03 Jul 2014 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the decision of the District Judge was dismissed. |
29 Jun 2014 | Prosecution | PartialThe prosecution's charge was amended, and the accused was convicted on the amended charge. |
29 Jun 2014 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant. |
25 Jun 2014 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
24 Jun 2014 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced for culpable homicide and offences under the Women's Charter. |
22 Jun 2014 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor was awarded costs to be paid by the accused persons. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
29 May 2014 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
27 May 2014 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the High Court's decision to convict the appellant on drug charges. |
27 May 2014 | Respondent | WonThe criminal motion filed by the Applicant was dismissed. |
26 May 2014 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence of probation was dismissed. |
22 May 2014 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence. |
15 May 2014 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, and the conviction was upheld. |
13 May 2014 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 8 years’ imprisonment. |
29 Apr 2014 | Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence of probation was dismissed. |
28 Apr 2014 | Respondent | LostAppeal allowed; imprisonment terms substituted with fines (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
15 Apr 2014 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
14 Apr 2014 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was reduced. |
10 Apr 2014 | Respondent | WonAppeal against sentence dismissed. |
06 Apr 2014 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the disqualification period reduced. |
03 Apr 2014 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
03 Apr 2014 | Applicant | DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's application to amend the respondent's previous convictions was dismissed. |
16 Mar 2014 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the criminal revision application. |
12 Mar 2014 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal of the accused on the impersonation charge was allowed. |
27 Feb 2014 | Respondent | LostAppeal allowed; convictions set aside. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Feb 2014 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the disqualification order was changed to commence from the date of the appellant's conviction. |
25 Feb 2014 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was deemed manifestly excessive. |
20 Feb 2014 | Respondent, Appellant | LostCross-appeal against sentence dismissed. |
18 Feb 2014 | Respondent | LostAppeal allowed and case remitted to the District Judge for a Newton hearing. |
06 Feb 2014 | Prosecution | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the re-sentencing of Wang Wenfeng to life imprisonment and caning was dismissed. |
26 Jan 2014 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 20 years' imprisonment. |
26 Jan 2014 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by ABE was dismissed. |
22 Jan 2014 | Applicant | PartialThe court set aside the Judge’s orders that the PP provide the respondents with (a) the identity of the persons whom the respondents allegedly conspired to defraud and (b) the reasons why the subcontract between ZTE and Questzone was allegedly fictitious. |
19 Jan 2014 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused. |
14 Jan 2014 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentences was dismissed. |
13 Jan 2014 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's motion. |
07 Jan 2014 | Prosecution | PartialThe prosecution sought a sentence of life imprisonment with 16-18 strokes of the cane. The court imposed life imprisonment with 10 strokes of the cane (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
06 Jan 2014 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the original sentence was allowed. |
01 Jan 2014 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and sentenced. |
08 Dec 2013 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part; imprisonment term reduced from 4 months to 4 weeks, but the fine of $30,000 (in default, 4 weeks’ imprisonment) remains. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
21 Nov 2013 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Wu Guo Hao Max was dismissed. |
17 Nov 2013 | Prosecution | LostThe prosecution urged the court to re-impose the death penalty on the convicted person, but the court re-sentenced the convicted person to life imprisonment and caning. |
14 Nov 2013 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction. |
10 Nov 2013 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part. |
07 Nov 2013 | Applicant | NeutralThe Public Prosecutor referred six questions of law for determination by the court. |
05 Nov 2013 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on all six charges. |
30 Oct 2013 | Respondent | LostThe prosecution's appeal against sentence was dismissed. |
23 Oct 2013 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court found that the accused acted as a courier only, giving him the benefit of the doubt under the new sentencing provisions. |
29 Sep 2013 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially upheld, resulting in a reduced fine and disqualification period. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
26 Sep 2013 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the appellant's sentence reduced from 4 months to 2 months. |
26 Sep 2013 | Respondent | LostAppeal upheld; convictions dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
26 Sep 2013 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the order made by DJ Sarah Tan, as the application for criminal revision was dismissed. |
22 Sep 2013 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant was upheld. |
19 Sep 2013 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed. |
17 Sep 2013 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was overturned. |
17 Sep 2013 | Respondent | LostAll 12 charges of corruption under s 6(a) of the PCA have not been made out. |
12 Sep 2013 | Prosecution | PartialAccused acquitted on first charge; convicted on second, third, and fourth charges. |
26 Aug 2013 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
19 Aug 2013 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the Respondent's imprisonment term was increased. |
12 Aug 2013 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentences imposed by the District Judge was allowed. |
04 Aug 2013 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
24 Jul 2013 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against sentences partially allowed; the sentence on the sixth charge was varied. |
18 Jul 2013 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction upheld. Appeal against sentence partially overturned, with the imprisonment term reduced from six weeks to one week (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
16 Jul 2013 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
16 Jul 2013 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence was upheld. |
14 Jul 2013 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully argued against the criminal motions filed by the applicants. |
09 Jul 2013 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentences for both charges was allowed. |
30 Jun 2013 | Respondent | PartialAppeal partially allowed as the sentence was varied from eight months to two weeks. |
27 Jun 2013 | Applicant | WonThe Court of Appeal held that the prosecution does not need to prove that the accused imported the controlled drug for the purpose of trafficking to secure a conviction under Section 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act. |
19 May 2013 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor partially won the case, securing a conviction for both accused, but one accused received a life sentence instead of the death penalty. |
29 Apr 2013 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment and caning. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Apr 2013 | Respondent | LostThe respondent's arguments were rejected and the application was allowed. |
08 Apr 2013 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of all charges, save that the 3rd charge was amended. |
07 Apr 2013 | Respondent | Unknown |
26 Mar 2013 | Respondent | LostThe High Court ordered the Public Prosecutor to provide further particulars regarding the identity of the defrauded party and the reasons why the sub-contract between ZTE and Questzone was alleged to be fictitious. |
18 Mar 2013 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the respondent's acquittal was dismissed. |
07 Mar 2013 | Respondent | LostThe Court of Appeal allowed the First Appellant's appeal, finding that he rebutted the presumption in s 18(2) of the MDA on a balance of probabilities. |
07 Mar 2013 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased. |
20 Feb 2013 | Applicant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's petition to amend the charge against the respondent was dismissed. |
29 Jan 2013 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
28 Jan 2013 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on both charges. |
17 Jan 2013 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 19 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
10 Jan 2013 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully opposed the criminal motions for leave to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal. |
29 Nov 2012 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, overturning the conviction obtained by the Public Prosecutor. |
29 Nov 2012 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentences imposed was allowed in part, with the sentences for the First and Third Charges enhanced. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
29 Nov 2012 | Appellant | PartialAppeal allowed in part; Ong Eng Teck was convicted on three of eight charges. |
29 Nov 2012 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor partially won the case, securing a murder conviction on one charge but failing to secure murder convictions on two other charges due to the defense of diminished responsibility. |
06 Nov 2012 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
01 Nov 2012 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence of two weeks' imprisonment was overturned (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
01 Nov 2012 | Respondent, Appellant | PartialThe court held that TCH’s properties are realisable properties. |
29 Oct 2012 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
23 Oct 2012 | Prosecution | Unknown |
22 Oct 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal; the reference was dismissed. |
09 Oct 2012 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the initial charge amended to a less serious offence. |
27 Sep 2012 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the case was remitted to the District Court for a new trial. |
13 Sep 2012 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
03 Sep 2012 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the imprisonment term was enhanced. |
28 Aug 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the application to set aside the conviction and sentence. |
22 Aug 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, and the appellant's conviction for murder was upheld. |
14 Aug 2012 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, and the initial conviction of murder was overturned. |
12 Aug 2012 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased. |
09 Aug 2012 | Respondent | WonThe court found the law constitutional and within the powers of the Legislature. |
09 Aug 2012 | Respondent | WonThe court determined that section 33A(5)(a) of the Misuse of Drugs Act does not violate the principle of separation of powers. |
06 Aug 2012 | Respondent | PartialApplications of Wong Yuh Lan and Lim Yong Nam allowed; applications of Lim Kow Seng and Hia Soo Gan Benson dismissed. |
31 Jul 2012 | Respondent | LostConviction set aside and case remitted to the District Court for plea to be re-taken. |
26 Jul 2012 | Respondent | PartialAppeal dismissed in part regarding the insider trading conviction of Chong Keng Ban. |
10 Jul 2012 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence was successful, resulting in a reduced sentence for the appellant. |
10 Jul 2012 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the conviction was allowed, and the original fine is to be refunded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Jun 2012 | Respondent | WonThe appellant's criminal revision and appeal were both dismissed. |
24 Jun 2012 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 12 years’ preventive detention. |
11 Jun 2012 | Respondent | LostAppeal allowed; original custodial sentence overturned. |
23 May 2012 | Respondent | LostBail granted to the applicant, Christanto Radius, at $2,000,000 in two sureties, with specific conditions. |
23 May 2012 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence was partially upheld, with the fine and caning remaining, but the imprisonment term was reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
20 May 2012 | Respondent | PartialPartial judgment; appeal dismissed for five appellants, but appeal allowed for one appellant. |
13 May 2012 | Appellant, Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part; Mas Swan convicted of attempted importation of ecstasy; Roshamima's conviction for importing diamorphine set aside; convicted of attempted importation of ecstasy. |
17 Apr 2012 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's case was dismissed on appeal. |
16 Apr 2012 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentences was allowed, and the sentences were increased. |
16 Apr 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed. |
10 Apr 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld as the appeal was dismissed. |
08 Apr 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction and sentence imposed on Quek Hock Lye. |
03 Apr 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for importing diamorphine. |
03 Apr 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against Yong Vui Kong's motion. |
20 Mar 2012 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of murder. |
18 Mar 2012 | Respondent, Petitioner | LostThe appeal was dismissed and the conditional discharge was granted. |
08 Mar 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the applicant's motion. |
06 Mar 2012 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor sought a 20-year sentence, but the court imposed a 10-year sentence. |
05 Mar 2012 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions of Chan Heng Kong and Sng Chun Heng. |
05 Mar 2012 | Respondent | LostThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, overturning the conviction obtained by the Public Prosecutor. |
04 Mar 2012 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
08 Feb 2012 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased. |
06 Feb 2012 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed. |
02 Feb 2012 | Respondent | PartialThe Court of Appeal reduced the sentence. |
29 Jan 2012 | Respondent | PartialFines and caning reduced; imprisonment term undisturbed. |
11 Jan 2012 | Respondent | PartialThe appellant's term of imprisonment was reduced from five to two weeks. |
29 Dec 2011 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced from 10 months to 15 months' imprisonment. |
30 Nov 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of all seven charges. |
29 Nov 2011 | Respondent | LostAppeal allowed and a retrial was ordered. |
21 Nov 2011 | Respondent, Applicant | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against the sentence for salary charges. |
20 Nov 2011 | Respondent | NeutralCross-appeal against sentences dismissed. |
17 Nov 2011 | Respondent | WonThe application for a Mandatory Order was dismissed. |
03 Nov 2011 | Prosecution | LostThe accused were sentenced to imprisonment. |
01 Nov 2011 | Prosecution | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal for a life sentence was dismissed. |
12 Oct 2011 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the Appellant for murder was affirmed. |
04 Oct 2011 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused were found guilty as charged. |
03 Oct 2011 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. |
26 Sep 2011 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. Assumed currency is SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction. |
25 Sep 2011 | Prosecution | PartialOne defendant was found guilty of murder, while the other was convicted of robbery with hurt. |
20 Sep 2011 | Prosecution | WonThe prosecution proved its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. |
20 Sep 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 13 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
19 Sep 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty of murder. |
14 Sep 2011 | Applicant | WonConfiscation order granted against Ng Teck Lee for US$51,196,938.52. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction. |
06 Sep 2011 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, upholding the appellant's conviction. |
25 Aug 2011 | Respondent, Applicant | NeutralThe court clarified the scope of the Prosecution's duty of disclosure. |
24 Aug 2011 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the custodial sentence was dismissed. |
21 Aug 2011 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
17 Aug 2011 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's objection to bail was overruled. |
03 Aug 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 27 years’ imprisonment and 20 strokes of the cane. |
01 Aug 2011 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence for trafficking in diamorphine was dismissed. |
26 Jul 2011 | Prosecution | NeutralThe Public Prosecutor sought a life sentence, but the court imposed a 10-year imprisonment term. |
20 Jul 2011 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal against the fine for the s 32(3)(a) offence was unsuccessful. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
30 May 2011 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
29 May 2011 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal dismissed the applicant's motion. |
26 May 2011 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was increased. |
25 May 2011 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted and sentenced to 14 years' imprisonment. |
25 May 2011 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the sentence was varied to a term of six weeks’ imprisonment and a fine of $25,000 per charge. |
23 May 2011 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor partially lost the appeal as Galing's conviction was reduced. |
02 May 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
28 Apr 2011 | Prosecution | PartialConviction of one defendant, acquittal of the other. |
27 Apr 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged and convicted accordingly. |
25 Apr 2011 | Respondent | WonConviction and sentence upheld. |
14 Apr 2011 | Respondent | LostThe Court of Appeal allowed the appeal. |
12 Apr 2011 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal to increase the disqualification period was allowed. |
11 Apr 2011 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the initial conviction of murder was overturned. |
10 Apr 2011 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the amendment of charges and sentences was dismissed. |
10 Apr 2011 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
07 Apr 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted on the charges and sentenced to life imprisonment for each offence. |
06 Apr 2011 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed. |
27 Mar 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 16 years' imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane. |
24 Mar 2011 | Prosecution | PartialConviction of Quek Hock Lye, but Somchit acquitted of the main charge. |
14 Mar 2011 | Respondent | PartialSentence of imprisonment varied from a total of twelve months to eight months. |
14 Mar 2011 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against the disqualification from driving. |
10 Mar 2011 | Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
06 Mar 2011 | Respondent | NeutralThe Public Prosecutor entered a nolle prosequi, discontinuing the charges against the second respondent. |
28 Feb 2011 | Respondent | WonApplication to reserve questions of law to the Court of Appeal was dismissed. |
24 Feb 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 12 years imprisonment and 10 strokes of the cane. |
21 Feb 2011 | Respondent | WonAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
21 Feb 2011 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions of Pang Siew Fum and Cheong Chun Yin. |
21 Feb 2011 | Respondent | WonAppeals against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
16 Feb 2011 | Respondent | LostConvictions and sentences set aside. |
15 Feb 2011 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the sentence was allowed. |
06 Feb 2011 | Prosecution | WonDefendant sentenced to 26 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
19 Jan 2011 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; original conviction and sentence upheld. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
18 Jan 2011 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the defendant. |
10 Jan 2011 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Tan Chin Heng was dismissed. |
10 Jan 2011 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Choi Byeongkuk was dismissed. |
10 Jan 2011 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
02 Jan 2011 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced to death. |
30 Dec 2010 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
20 Dec 2010 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
15 Dec 2010 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant for drug trafficking was upheld. |
07 Dec 2010 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; original sentence overturned. |
11 Nov 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty of murder as charged. |
10 Nov 2010 | Prosecution | WonThe prosecution's submissions were largely accepted, and the accused were sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
07 Nov 2010 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed and the murder conviction was set aside. |
07 Nov 2010 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction allowed in part; sentence reduced. |
28 Oct 2010 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
27 Oct 2010 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction under s 13E(5)(a) of the Registration of Criminals Act allowed, and fine of $500 to be refunded. Appeal against conviction under s 13(2)(a) of the Registration of Criminals Act dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Oct 2010 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused were convicted. |
24 Oct 2010 | Respondent, Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Oct 2010 | Prosecution | LostThe Prosecution's case was dismissed due to insufficient evidence. |
03 Oct 2010 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was dismissed. |
19 Sep 2010 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially successful as the sentence was reduced. |
16 Sep 2010 | Plaintiff | WonThe offenders were sentenced to imprisonment and caning. |
13 Sep 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted and sentenced to death. |
02 Sep 2010 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part for two of the appellants. |
29 Aug 2010 | Respondent | WonThe High Court upheld the District Judge's decision to convict the appellant on the four Deployment Charges. |
29 Aug 2010 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentences imposed by the District Judge were increased. |
19 Aug 2010 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was overturned. |
17 Aug 2010 | Respondent, Appellant, Applicant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal to increase the sentence was allowed. |
12 Aug 2010 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was set aside. |
10 Aug 2010 | Prosecution | OtherThe Public Prosecutor has appealed against the sentence of six years' imprisonment. |
09 Aug 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged and sentenced to suffer death. |
04 Aug 2010 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
29 Jul 2010 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused were convicted of murder. |
28 Jul 2010 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was dismissed and the original sentence of 48 months' imprisonment was overturned. |
20 Jul 2010 | Prosecution | WonLim and Koay were found guilty of drug trafficking. |
14 Jul 2010 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence against appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
08 Jul 2010 | Prosecution | WonFirst accused found guilty. |
01 Jul 2010 | Respondent | WonConviction for dangerous driving and causing grievous hurt was upheld, although the sentence was reduced. |
22 Jun 2010 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the conviction was allowed. |
26 May 2010 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld in part, as the appeal against conviction was dismissed, but the appeal against sentence was allowed in part. Currency assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
23 May 2010 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was dismissed and the initial sentence was overturned. |
13 May 2010 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the constitutionality of the mandatory death penalty. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
06 May 2010 | Respondent | LostThe petition was allowed, the Warrant of Arrest was quashed, and the aggregate fine for the two CGHA charges was reduced to $92,542. |
04 May 2010 | Prosecution | WonAHB was found guilty on all charges. |
29 Apr 2010 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced. |
28 Apr 2010 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor lost the murder charge but won the culpable homicide conviction. |
21 Apr 2010 | Prosecution | WonThe prosecution won the case against both accused. |
21 Apr 2010 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor was the respondent in both appeals. They won the appeal against Balbir Singh but lost the appeal against Taniguchi Mitsuru. |
19 Apr 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted as charged. |
13 Apr 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
31 Mar 2010 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed and the orders for acquittal against all five respondents are set aside. |
18 Mar 2010 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on all charges. |
16 Mar 2010 | Appellant | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the sentences adjusted. |
16 Mar 2010 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's case was dismissed on appeal. |
14 Mar 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and convicted on all five charges. |
09 Mar 2010 | Prosecution | WonThe court sentenced the accused persons to imprisonment and caning. |
09 Mar 2010 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially allowed as the sentence for criminal intimidation was reduced. |
08 Mar 2010 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
02 Mar 2010 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondents' sentences were increased. |
22 Feb 2010 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the initial sentence of four weeks' imprisonment was replaced with a fine (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 Feb 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty and convicted on three charges. |
03 Feb 2010 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused persons were found guilty. |
21 Jan 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of drug trafficking. |
20 Jan 2010 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentence was increased from 24 years to 32 years. |
19 Jan 2010 | Respondent | WonCriminal Motion No. 45 of 2009 granted. |
18 Jan 2010 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction dismissed; fine of $1,500 substituted with a probation order of six months and 40 hours of community service. |
10 Jan 2010 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on all seven charges. |
07 Jan 2010 | Prosecution | WonThe prosecution proved its case against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. |
05 Jan 2010 | Respondent | PartialAppeal partially lost; the initial fine was reduced, but the conviction was upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
04 Jan 2010 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
30 Dec 2009 | Respondent | LostThe applicant was allowed to proceed with his appeal. |
30 Dec 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted. |
28 Dec 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted of importing diamorphine. |
17 Dec 2009 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
07 Dec 2009 | Respondent | PartialThe High Court reduced the original sentence of 3 months' imprisonment to 1 month. |
03 Dec 2009 | Respondent, Applicant | PartialExtension of time granted to apply to the High Court Judge for leave to raise questions to the Court of Appeal. |
02 Dec 2009 | Respondent | LostStay of execution granted pending a decision by the Court of Appeal. |
02 Dec 2009 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentence of the District Judge was set aside. |
30 Nov 2009 | Respondent, Appellant | PartialThe Prosecution's appeal for enhanced sentencing was partially allowed, with the Judge's sentence of six months' imprisonment on the 12th and 13th charges increased to terms of nine months' imprisonment each. The sentences on the tenth, 12th and 13th charges are to run consecutively and the remaining sentences on the first and ninth charges are to run concurrently. |
29 Nov 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Iryan bin Abdul Karim, Muhammad Hamdan bin Abdul Rahman, and Mohammed Zameen bin Abdul Manoff, securing convictions on multiple charges. |
24 Nov 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and convicted on two charges; death sentence imposed for each charge. |
23 Nov 2009 | Respondent | LostAppeal lost; original sentence of eight weeks’ imprisonment substituted with a fine of $40,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
12 Nov 2009 | Respondent | PartialConviction under section 67(1)(b) of the Road Traffic Act quashed; court to hear counsel on whether to convict under section 68(1)(b). |
04 Nov 2009 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, and the original sentence was reduced. |
02 Nov 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully prosecuted Soh Song Soon, leading to his conviction and sentencing. |
28 Oct 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to five years' imprisonment. |
13 Oct 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured a conviction against the first accused, Ng Pen Tine. |
05 Oct 2009 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
28 Sep 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured a conviction against both accused. |
15 Sep 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
14 Sep 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 18 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane. |
10 Sep 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused had in his possession not less than 25.91grams of diamorphine for the purpose of trafficking. |
24 Aug 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced to death. |
17 Aug 2009 | Applicant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's application for revision of the sentence was dismissed. |
13 Aug 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 24 years imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
29 Jul 2009 | Prosecution | Won |
23 Jul 2009 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal against the decision of the district judge was allowed. |
09 Jul 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe accused persons were found guilty of culpable homicide and immigration offences. |
09 Jul 2009 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; the Public Prosecutor's arguments were not accepted. |
07 Jul 2009 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the judge’s decision to convict the respondent for the offence of carnal connection under the Women’s Charter was allowed. |
02 Jul 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe High Court upheld the sentence imposed by the lower court. |
29 Jun 2009 | Prosecution | Lost |
28 Jun 2009 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the sentence was increased. |
18 Jun 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of murder. |
27 May 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane for the first charge. Second accused sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane for the second charge, to run concurrently. |
25 May 2009 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the original sentence imposed on the appellant. |
24 May 2009 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction upheld. |
21 May 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 10 years. |
20 May 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused pleaded guilty and was convicted on all charges. |
14 May 2009 | Respondent, Appellant | LostAppeals against conviction dismissed. |
05 May 2009 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed and the original sentence was reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
26 Apr 2009 | Respondent | WonThe applicant's criminal motion was dismissed. |
26 Apr 2009 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal against the sentence was partially successful, with the sentence being reduced. |
20 Apr 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 42 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
19 Apr 2009 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal to set aside the sentence of nine years’ imprisonment imposed on Aniza binte Essa and to sentence her to life imprisonment was dismissed. |
19 Apr 2009 | Respondent | LostThe High Court allowed the applicant's appeal, setting aside the conviction and remitting the case back to the District Court for a retrial. |
16 Apr 2009 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's case was partially successful as the conviction for dangerous driving was upheld, but the sentence was reduced. |
12 Apr 2009 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially allowed, and the sentence was reduced. |
06 Apr 2009 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court reserved judgment. |
02 Apr 2009 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence. |
29 Mar 2009 | Prosecution | NeutralSentencing of the accused persons. |
24 Mar 2009 | Respondent | WonCriminal Motion No. 32 of 2008 was dismissed. |
23 Mar 2009 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the original sentence was overturned. |
23 Mar 2009 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentences imposed on Jeffery bin Abdullah was dismissed. |
22 Mar 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution proved its case against the Accused beyond reasonable doubt. |
11 Mar 2009 | Respondent | WonThe applications to transfer the trial were dismissed. |
08 Mar 2009 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence. |
01 Mar 2009 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal, and the appellant's sentence was enhanced from 24 months to 33 months. |
25 Feb 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe High Court reaffirmed its original decision and sentenced Ms. Barokah to life imprisonment. |
04 Feb 2009 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on five charges. |
08 Jan 2009 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the term of imprisonment was ordered to run from the date of the sentence. |
06 Jan 2009 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
05 Jan 2009 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the fine was allowed, and a six-week imprisonment term was imposed. |
29 Dec 2008 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
18 Nov 2008 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
13 Nov 2008 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
12 Nov 2008 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court sentenced the accused to four years and nine months’ imprisonment. The Public Prosecutor has filed an appeal against the sentence. |
06 Nov 2008 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application to reserve questions of law. |
06 Nov 2008 | Respondent | WonApplication for leave to appeal out of time was dismissed. |
19 Oct 2008 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; the original sentence of three months imprisonment was overturned (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
07 Oct 2008 | Prosecution | LostThe appeal by the accused was dismissed, upholding the convictions. |
25 Sep 2008 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed. |
23 Sep 2008 | Respondent | WonThe application against the Public Prosecutor was dismissed. |
22 Sep 2008 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on all 42 charges. |
01 Sep 2008 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed and the sentence was increased from one month to three months' imprisonment. |
19 Aug 2008 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed and the conviction was set aside. |
11 Aug 2008 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused was convicted under section 140(1)(i) of the Women’s Charter. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Aug 2008 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part, custodial sentence reduced, but penalty of $4,000 remains intact (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
04 Aug 2008 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentences imposed on the respondent was allowed, and the total length of imprisonment was increased from 12 months to 48 months. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
04 Aug 2008 | Respondent | WonThe application against the Public Prosecutor was dismissed. |
04 Aug 2008 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's application for adjournment. |
04 Aug 2008 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased. |
27 Jul 2008 | Prosecution | WonAll three accused persons were found guilty as charged. |
20 Jul 2008 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case, leading to the conviction of both accused. |
17 Jul 2008 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal. |
03 Jul 2008 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's case was dismissed on appeal. |
26 Jun 2008 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
12 Jun 2008 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was substituted. |
09 Jun 2008 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's initial sentencing was overturned on appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
28 May 2008 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case, securing a conviction against Amir bin Jubir. |
27 Apr 2008 | Prosecution | OtherThe Public Prosecutor appealed against the sentence of 9 years imprisonment. |
24 Apr 2008 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeals against the sentences imposed on the appellants. |
08 Apr 2008 | Respondent | LostAppeal lost; original sentence deemed manifestly excessive and reduced. |
10 Mar 2008 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the district judge's decision was allowed. |
09 Mar 2008 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the original sentence of one year's imprisonment was substituted with a sentence of three years' imprisonment. |
10 Feb 2008 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
03 Feb 2008 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed; original sentence overturned. |
30 Jan 2008 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and convicted for murder; death sentence imposed. |
17 Jan 2008 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 14 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
15 Jan 2008 | Respondent | WonThe conviction and sentence for trafficking diamorphine were affirmed. |
09 Jan 2008 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 24 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
11 Dec 2007 | Respondent | LostAppeal lost; conviction set aside. |
11 Dec 2007 | Respondent | LostAppeal against the quantum of the fine was allowed and the fine was reduced to $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
28 Nov 2007 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent was convicted on the charge. |
28 Nov 2007 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the District Court's sentence was dismissed. |
01 Nov 2007 | Respondent | PartialThe original sentence of imprisonment was altered to a fine (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
30 Oct 2007 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence imposed on the respondent by the district judge was allowed. |
30 Oct 2007 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution’s appeal was allowed, and the probation order was substituted with a sentence of reformative training with immediate effect. |
23 Oct 2007 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused was convicted of culpable homicide, but the sentence sought by the prosecution was not fully granted. |
16 Oct 2007 | Prosecution | WonSentences of imprisonment and caning were imposed on all six accused. |
11 Oct 2007 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to a total of 22 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
26 Sep 2007 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to nine years imprisonment. |
23 Sep 2007 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentences that were imposed by the district court on the ground that they were manifestly inadequate was allowed. |
19 Sep 2007 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
27 Aug 2007 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 16 years imprisonment. |
23 Aug 2007 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
13 Aug 2007 | Appellant | PartialAppeal allowed in part, with the sentence for drink driving increased. |
30 Jul 2007 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the respondent was allowed. |
23 Jul 2007 | Respondent | WonThe convictions of the Appellants were upheld. |
16 Jul 2007 | Applicant | WonThe Court of Appeal answered both questions in the affirmative. |
26 Jun 2007 | Prosecution | WonAll three accused persons were found guilty on the charge they faced, convicted them, and imposed the mandatory death sentence on them. |
19 Jun 2007 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of rape and sentenced to 16 years imprisonment and ten strokes of the cane. |
29 May 2007 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to one year's imprisonment. |
21 May 2007 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
16 May 2007 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced to death. |
13 May 2007 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
29 Apr 2007 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's position was partially upheld as the appeal was dismissed in part. |
17 Apr 2007 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction was set aside. |
02 Apr 2007 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court found no reason to alter the original verdict and orders made at the end of the trial. |
25 Mar 2007 | Prosecution | NeutralThe court sentenced the accused to two years and six months’ imprisonment backdated to date of arrest. |
15 Mar 2007 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
06 Mar 2007 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent's sentence was enhanced. |
22 Feb 2007 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the life sentence. |
14 Feb 2007 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
23 Jan 2007 | Respondent | WonApplication dismissed as misconceived. |
16 Jan 2007 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the Public Prosecutor was dismissed. |
14 Jan 2007 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to three years imprisonment. |
14 Jan 2007 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty of murder and sentenced to the mandatory death penalty. |
20 Dec 2006 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed in part. Sentence for market rigging altered to six months' imprisonment. Sentences for deceitful practice reduced to fines of $50,000 each (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
12 Dec 2006 | Respondent | WonThe High Court enhanced the sentence imposed by the District Court. |
10 Dec 2006 | Prosecution | WonThe High Court allowed the revision and imposed mandatory imprisonment terms. |
28 Nov 2006 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted. |
22 Nov 2006 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to ten years imprisonment and six strokes of the cane. |
07 Nov 2006 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended against the applicant's criminal motion for a mistrial. |
07 Nov 2006 | Respondent | WonApplication dismissed. |
26 Oct 2006 | Prosecution | PartialAccused found guilty of the fourth, sixth and seventh charges and convicted accordingly. Accused discharged and acquitted of the first, second, third, fifth, and eighth charges. |
18 Oct 2006 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was allowed in part, with the fine reduced from $200,000 to $80,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
05 Oct 2006 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the murder conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
24 Sep 2006 | Prosecution | LostThe Public Prosecutor's case was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to the dismissal of all charges. |
21 Sep 2006 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application to discharge the orders. |
20 Sep 2006 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. |
20 Sep 2006 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the original conviction was overturned. |
20 Sep 2006 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
07 Sep 2006 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially dismissed as the sentence was reduced but not fully overturned. |
31 Aug 2006 | Respondent | WonThe application for criminal revision was dismissed. |
10 Aug 2006 | Prosecution | LostThe prosecution failed to prove that BIGL gave the financial assistance in question, leading to the acquittal of both accused. |
07 Aug 2006 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction upheld. |
23 Jul 2006 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was dismissed, and the convictions were upheld. |
19 Jul 2006 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction upheld; appeal against sentence overturned. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
06 Jul 2006 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused was convicted of a lesser charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. |
06 Jul 2006 | Respondent | LostAppeal against sentences for theft and criminal intimidation was allowed. The sentence of 21 months’ imprisonment on the charge of criminal intimidation was reduced to three months. The sentence of 12 months’ imprisonment for the conviction of theft was substituted with a fine of $1,000 and in default thereof, a sentence of two weeks’ imprisonment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
04 Jul 2006 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced. |
06 Jun 2006 | Respondent | LostThe respondent's objection to the motion was overruled. |
28 May 2006 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused was found guilty of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. |
25 May 2006 | Prosecution | PartialAccused acquitted on attempted rape charge but convicted of outrage of modesty. |
18 May 2006 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty of murder and sentenced to death. |
25 Apr 2006 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of murder. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Apr 2006 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal on the murder charge was upheld. |
17 Apr 2006 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 32 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
10 Apr 2006 | Respondent | WonApplication for extension of time to apply for leave to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
06 Apr 2006 | Prosecution | PartialThe Prosecution sought a life sentence, but the court imposed a 10-year sentence for culpable homicide and a 3-year sentence for kidnapping, to run consecutively. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
30 Mar 2006 | Respondent | LostBail reduced from $100,000 to $50,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
27 Mar 2006 | Prosecution | PartialThe Prosecution sought life imprisonment, but the court imposed a 10-year sentence. |
20 Mar 2006 | Respondent | WonThe court upheld the forfeiture order of the vehicle. |
15 Mar 2006 | Respondent | PartialConviction for the second offence upheld. |
15 Mar 2006 | Respondent | WonThe appeals by both appellants were dismissed. |
14 Mar 2006 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed. |
13 Mar 2006 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
07 Mar 2006 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction of R Alagiyasolan. |
13 Feb 2006 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed and the original sentence was upheld. |
09 Feb 2006 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
09 Feb 2006 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
24 Jan 2006 | Respondent | WonThe conviction and mandatory death sentence were affirmed. |
23 Jan 2006 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of kidnapping and culpable homicide. |
21 Dec 2005 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused found guilty and convicted. |
08 Dec 2005 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's opposition to probation was overruled, and the appeal was allowed. |
08 Dec 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeals of both appellants were dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
30 Nov 2005 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part. Sentences for abduction and rape to run concurrently. |
29 Nov 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, and the sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment was not disturbed. |
29 Nov 2005 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of murder. |
10 Nov 2005 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant was upheld. |
10 Nov 2005 | Respondent | WonConviction upheld. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore. |
03 Nov 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction of the appellant. |
03 Nov 2005 | Respondent | WonThe High Court enhanced the sentence to 24 months’ imprisonment with nine strokes of the cane. |
16 Oct 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeals of both appellants against conviction and sentence were dismissed. |
13 Oct 2005 | Respondent | WonConviction upheld after amendment of charge to abetment by intentional aiding. |
03 Oct 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the drug trafficking conviction. |
22 Sep 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, and the appellant's sentences were enhanced by the High Court. |
04 Sep 2005 | Prosecution | PartialThe Prosecution's charge of murder was not proven, but the accused were convicted of culpable homicide. |
30 Aug 2005 | Respondent | WonBail application denied. |
29 Aug 2005 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted on all charges he claimed trial to. |
25 Aug 2005 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
16 Aug 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeals against conviction and sentence were dismissed, and the sentences were enhanced. |
15 Aug 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal and obtained an enhancement of the sentence. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Aug 2005 | Prosecution | Unknown |
07 Aug 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal. |
01 Aug 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
14 Jul 2005 | Prosecution | WonThe Prosecution proved the charge against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. |
14 Jul 2005 | Appellant | WonThe appeal was allowed, and the respondents were convicted of murder. |
12 Jul 2005 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of the charge pursuant to s 4(1) of the Arms Offences Act (Cap 14, 1998 Rev Ed). |
11 Jul 2005 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's case against the appellant was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, resulting in the appeal being allowed. |
05 Jul 2005 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to four years’ imprisonment and disqualified from driving all classes of motor vehicles for life. |
30 Jun 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application by Cigar Affair. |
12 Jun 2005 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
29 May 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
11 May 2005 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
27 Apr 2005 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor's petition to revise the sentence was allowed. |
21 Apr 2005 | Prosecution | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
12 Apr 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner. |
05 Apr 2005 | Petitioner | WonThe Public Prosecutor's petition to set aside the respondent's conviction was allowed. |
04 Apr 2005 | Respondent | PartialThe High Court reduced the sentence from 12 months to 8 months. |
31 Mar 2005 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment for life. |
15 Mar 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal affirmed the death sentence imposed on the appellant. |
07 Mar 2005 | Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction and sentence was allowed. |
06 Mar 2005 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
27 Feb 2005 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. |
21 Feb 2005 | Respondent | WonThe applicant's motion was dismissed. |
21 Feb 2005 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
14 Feb 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence of life imprisonment was dismissed, affirming the original sentence. |
13 Feb 2005 | Respondent | WonThe court upheld the order to forfeit the jewellery. |
01 Feb 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Pannirselvam was dismissed. |
01 Feb 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed. |
01 Feb 2005 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
01 Feb 2005 | Respondent | WonThe respondent's position was upheld as the appeal was dismissed. |
01 Feb 2005 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction upheld. Sentences for wrongful confinement and false impersonation reduced. |
31 Jan 2005 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld as the appeal and petition for criminal revision were dismissed. |
31 Jan 2005 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor partially lost the appeal as the sentence was reduced. |
30 Jan 2005 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
23 Jan 2005 | Prosecution | PartialThe charge of murder was reduced to a charge under Section 394 of the Penal Code. |
13 Jan 2005 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
02 Dec 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and sentenced to death. |
22 Nov 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and sentence imposed by the trial judge. |
09 Nov 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
07 Nov 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the murder conviction was dismissed. |
04 Nov 2004 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; compensation order granted for SGD 3,580 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
04 Nov 2004 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction on the third and fourth charges dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
04 Nov 2004 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to four years’ imprisonment. |
03 Nov 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against conviction. |
28 Oct 2004 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
24 Oct 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on both charges. |
19 Oct 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by the appellant was dismissed. |
17 Oct 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeals against conviction and sentence were dismissed. |
04 Oct 2004 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's application. |
28 Sep 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of culpable homicide and sentenced to life imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
23 Sep 2004 | Prosecution | PartialThe initial charge of murder was reduced to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. |
15 Sep 2004 | Respondent | WonThe court upheld the decision to withhold consent to composition. |
12 Sep 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty of murder and sentenced to death. |
09 Sep 2004 | Respondent | PartialAppeal on sentence allowed in part, with the sentence for DAC 3550/2004 to be reduced from four months’ to two months’ imprisonment. |
08 Sep 2004 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused persons were convicted of kidnapping. |
07 Sep 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on amended charge and sentenced to death. |
07 Sep 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction for trafficking was affirmed. |
06 Sep 2004 | Respondent | WonThe court upheld the forfeiture order of the vehicle. |
02 Sep 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed. |
25 Aug 2004 | Appellant | WonThe Prosecution's appeal against the order of acquittal was allowed. |
22 Aug 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for trafficking in diamorphine. |
12 Aug 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
12 Aug 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction. |
10 Aug 2004 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal; original conviction and sentence upheld. |
10 Aug 2004 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured convictions against both accused for robbery with hurt and against the first accused for an immigration offence. |
04 Aug 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of culpable homicide. |
27 Jul 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
25 Jul 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted on all four charges. |
23 Jul 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of the appellant. |
23 Jun 2004 | Applicant | NeutralThe Public Prosecutor agreed with the district judge that the conviction and sentence should be set aside and the case remitted back to the subordinate courts for a fresh plea to be taken on a charge as appropriately amended. |
23 Jun 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and convicted; mandatory death sentence imposed. |
22 Jun 2004 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; the case was remitted to the trial judge for further action under s 315 of the Criminal Procedure Code. |
14 Jun 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed, upholding the original judgment. |
14 Jun 2004 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused was convicted on the first charge of rape. |
14 Jun 2004 | Appellant | LostThe Prosecution's appeal against the sentences imposed on the respondents was dismissed. |
14 Jun 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
06 Jun 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused Raffi Bin Jelan sentenced to 20 years of preventive detention and 21 strokes of caning. |
27 May 2004 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to imprisonment of three years and six months. |
11 May 2004 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction dismissed. |
05 May 2004 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
04 May 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the application to set aside the conviction. |
03 May 2004 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case. |
28 Apr 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. |
21 Apr 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of murder. |
15 Apr 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by the defendant was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
13 Apr 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant. |
13 Apr 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed. |
12 Apr 2004 | Prosecution | PartialAccused acquitted of rape charges but convicted of causing hurt. |
01 Apr 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on all charges. |
31 Mar 2004 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of drug trafficking. |
19 Mar 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and convicted; sentenced to death. |
16 Mar 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty of murder. |
04 Mar 2004 | Respondent | LostAppeal against sentence allowed; sentence reduced to 12 months imprisonment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
03 Mar 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence. |
02 Mar 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction and sentence were affirmed. |
01 Mar 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of culpable homicide. |
26 Feb 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction of the appellant. |
25 Feb 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
24 Feb 2004 | Respondent | WonThe petition for criminal revision was dismissed. |
23 Feb 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, maintaining the original conviction and sentence. |
03 Feb 2004 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld against three appellants, but the appeal of the fourth appellant was allowed. |
03 Feb 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
02 Feb 2004 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal against the 12-month imprisonment sentence was partially successful, with the sentence reduced to six months. |
28 Jan 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction. |
27 Jan 2004 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced. |
26 Jan 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
19 Jan 2004 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to a total of three years and nine months imprisonment. |
09 Jan 2004 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction of the appellant for murder. |
08 Jan 2004 | Respondent | WonConviction and sentence affirmed. |
08 Jan 2004 | Respondent | LostThe High Court dismissed the Public Prosecutor's case. |
05 Dec 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on the charge and sentenced according to the law. |
02 Dec 2003 | Appellant | LostThe appeal against the sentence imposed by the magistrate was dismissed. |
02 Dec 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
25 Nov 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
18 Nov 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty and convicted as charged. |
14 Nov 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on all charges. |
13 Nov 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal, with the court dismissing the appellant's challenge to her conviction and sentence. |
05 Nov 2003 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal against sentence was allowed, and the sentence was reduced to one month's imprisonment. |
03 Nov 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
02 Nov 2003 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
30 Oct 2003 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal for an increase in sentence to life imprisonment was dismissed. |
29 Oct 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
28 Oct 2003 | Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal was dismissed. |
27 Oct 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, with the court upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
20 Oct 2003 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction dismissed, but sentence reduced. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
16 Oct 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed. |
15 Oct 2003 | Applicant | WonThe High Court allowed the application and reinstated the original conviction and sentence of three months' imprisonment. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore. |
14 Oct 2003 | Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
13 Oct 2003 | Applicant | WonApplication for criminal revision allowed. |
12 Oct 2003 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount is applicable. |
05 Oct 2003 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal of the respondent was dismissed. |
01 Oct 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of murder (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
29 Sep 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
24 Sep 2003 | Prosecution | WonVelu was convicted of abetting rape. |
18 Sep 2003 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, enhancing the sentence to 20 years' preventive detention. |
17 Sep 2003 | Respondent | WonThe application for retrial and stay of execution was dismissed. |
15 Sep 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty as charged. |
11 Sep 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 20 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
10 Sep 2003 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused sentenced to imprisonment and caning. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
07 Sep 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
28 Aug 2003 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. |
27 Aug 2003 | Respondent | PartialThe Public Prosecutor partially lost the appeal as the sentence was reduced to a fine. |
25 Aug 2003 | Respondent | WonPublic Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence imposed on the first charge was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced to 15 months' imprisonment. |
24 Aug 2003 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed; sentence enhanced to 36 months’ imprisonment. |
21 Aug 2003 | Applicant | LostThe court answered the criminal reference in the negative, holding that the proviso to section 11(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code does not allow the District Court, or the High Court in its appellate jurisdiction, to impose a sentence beyond the maximum limit prescribed for the offense. |
20 Aug 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application to admit Nigel John Seed QC. |
20 Aug 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment and caning. |
17 Aug 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
10 Aug 2003 | Prosecution | WonAll three accused were found guilty as charged and convicted. |
04 Aug 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe accused were found guilty and sentenced. |
31 Jul 2003 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction upheld; imprisonment term overturned and substituted with a fine of $250 for the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Jul 2003 | Respondent | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
24 Jul 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted of culpable homicide. |
21 Jul 2003 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
20 Jul 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Pritam Singh was dismissed. |
16 Jul 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of murder. |
16 Jul 2003 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, but the appeal against sentence was allowed. |
15 Jul 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
13 Jul 2003 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld. |
10 Jul 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to seven years imprisonment for culpable homicide and 12 months imprisonment for causing grievous hurt, to run concurrently. |
07 Jul 2003 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant for drug trafficking was upheld. |
05 Jun 2003 | Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction allowed; original conviction for murder overturned. |
01 Jun 2003 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the accused was convicted. |
29 May 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against Chee Soon Juan's appeal. |
25 May 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, upholding the original conviction and sentence. |
21 May 2003 | Prosecution | WonSecond and Fourth Accused convicted of abetment of rape and offences under the Women's Charter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
16 May 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case for murder was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
08 May 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to life imprisonment. |
04 May 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the petition to revise the sentence. |
29 Apr 2003 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed and sentences enhanced. |
29 Apr 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the petition to quash the conviction and the appeal against the sentence. |
22 Apr 2003 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal of Yeow Beng Chye was dismissed. |
16 Apr 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeals were dismissed. |
15 Apr 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, upholding the original sentence. |
13 Apr 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment and 4 strokes of the cane. |
10 Apr 2003 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the decision to acquit the respondent was dismissed. |
08 Apr 2003 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the original sentence was allowed. |
01 Apr 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case as the accused was convicted. |
30 Mar 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to imprisonment and caning. |
30 Mar 2003 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed and the respondent was convicted on the fourth charge. |
24 Mar 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. |
23 Mar 2003 | Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the defendant was dismissed. |
23 Mar 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment and caning. |
20 Mar 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case. |
17 Mar 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Lim Ek Kian was dismissed. |
16 Mar 2003 | Appellant | LostAppeal against acquittal of murder charge dismissed; respondents convicted of causing grievous hurt instead. |
12 Mar 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 18 years imprisonment. |
11 Mar 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal, maintaining the murder conviction. |
11 Mar 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction for trafficking cannabis was dismissed. |
10 Mar 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal. |
04 Mar 2003 | Prosecution | WonSentences of imprisonment and caning imposed on all five accused. |
02 Mar 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused was sentenced to nine years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane. |
02 Mar 2003 | Prosecution | LostThe High Court quashed the conviction of the accused. |
27 Feb 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe prosecution proved its case against the accused beyond any reasonable doubt. |
26 Feb 2003 | Respondent | WonThe court dismissed the applicant's motion to suspend her sentence. |
23 Feb 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty of murder. |
20 Feb 2003 | Applicant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's motion to refer a question of law to the Court of Appeal was allowed. |
17 Feb 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction. |
13 Feb 2003 | Prosecution | Won |
06 Feb 2003 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal of the respondent was dismissed. |
05 Feb 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction for unauthorized import of diamorphine was dismissed. |
04 Feb 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentences imposed. |
03 Feb 2003 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of Comfort Management Pte Ltd was upheld. |
03 Feb 2003 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted on six charges. |
23 Jan 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe accused were found guilty on the charges they faced. |
22 Jan 2003 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted on charges A1, A2, A3, and A5. |
21 Jan 2003 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeals against the convictions. |
20 Jan 2003 | Respondent | WonThe original sentence of 12 months' imprisonment was upheld. |
19 Jan 2003 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, overturning the acquittal of the respondents. |
15 Jan 2003 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Tay Chi Hiong was dismissed. |
30 Dec 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of the charge. |
13 Dec 2002 | Appellant | LostThe appeal against the acquittal of the respondent was dismissed. |
13 Dec 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
12 Dec 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
11 Dec 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
10 Dec 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
09 Dec 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
09 Dec 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed, and the sentence imposed by the trial judge was affirmed. |
08 Dec 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed. |
03 Dec 2002 | Applicant | WonEntire bail amount of $32,000 forfeited. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
21 Nov 2002 | Respondent | PartialAppeal dismissed in MA 211 of 2002. Appeal allowed in MA 210 of 2002, reducing the term of preventive detention from 20 years to 10 years, to commence on the expiration of the sentence in MA 211 of 2002. |
19 Nov 2002 | Prosecution | LostAll charges against the accused were dismissed due to reasonable doubt. |
07 Nov 2002 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed. |
05 Nov 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted as charged. |
31 Oct 2002 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor accepted the accused's guilty plea to reduced charges of manslaughter and robbery. |
27 Oct 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
20 Oct 2002 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, and the conviction and sentence were set aside. |
17 Oct 2002 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against conviction dismissed, but appeal against sentence allowed, reducing the sentence. |
15 Oct 2002 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent was convicted. |
14 Oct 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Yeo Chiang Chew was dismissed. |
14 Oct 2002 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused persons were convicted. |
13 Oct 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions of the appellants. |
10 Oct 2002 | Petitioner | WonPetition for criminal revision allowed; fine enhanced from $1,500 to $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
07 Oct 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
25 Sep 2002 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted of three charges of rape. |
23 Sep 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
19 Sep 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed, upholding the original judgment. |
17 Sep 2002 | Prosecution | LostCharges against the accused were dismissed due to reasonable doubt. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
16 Sep 2002 | Respondent | PartialThe High Court upheld the imprisonment sentence but set aside the caning sentence. |
15 Sep 2002 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent was sentenced to preventive detention for 20 years. |
12 Sep 2002 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the original sentence was replaced with a term of imprisonment. |
09 Sep 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld. |
01 Sep 2002 | Prosecution | Won |
01 Sep 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case against the appellant was upheld. |
29 Aug 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for possession of cocaine. |
27 Aug 2002 | Respondent | LostThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed, but the original sentence was set aside due to a jurisdictional error. |
26 Aug 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
25 Aug 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed. |
25 Aug 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the original conviction and sentence. |
23 Aug 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
22 Aug 2002 | Applicant | WonApplication for criminal revision allowed. |
13 Aug 2002 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to eight years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane. |
11 Aug 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor secured a conviction against all three accused for drug trafficking. |
04 Aug 2002 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 9 years imprisonment for the first charge and 3 years imprisonment for the second charge, to run concurrently. |
04 Aug 2002 | Prosecution | WonJudgment for the Prosecution. |
30 Jul 2002 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed. Sentence enhanced to 14 years’ corrective training. |
25 Jul 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment. |
25 Jul 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment. |
22 Jul 2002 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed and case remitted back to the court below for the defence to be called. |
21 Jul 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
21 Jul 2002 | Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal against the respondent's acquittal was dismissed. |
17 Jul 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
14 Jul 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
14 Jul 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed and the original sentence was upheld. |
11 Jul 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the convictions and sentences. |
11 Jul 2002 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 24 years imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane. |
09 Jul 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for theft. |
09 Jul 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
07 Jul 2002 | Prosecution | PartialThe accused were found guilty of rioting, not murder. |
13 Jun 2002 | Prosecution | PartialAccused sentenced to four years imprisonment, but preventive detention order not made. |
30 May 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the applicant's motion to postpone the commencement of his sentence. |
29 May 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction was dismissed. |
29 May 2002 | Respondent | WonThe petition for criminal revision was dismissed in favour of the Public Prosecutor. |
23 May 2002 | Prosecution | WonSentences imposed on both accused persons. |
16 May 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking. |
15 May 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced. |
12 May 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane. |
29 Apr 2002 | Respondent | WonThe conviction and sentence of the appellant were affirmed. |
29 Apr 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against Yap Siew Luan. |
26 Apr 2002 | Prosecution | PartialFine of $1,000 imposed on each charge (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
23 Apr 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed, upholding the original judgment. |
18 Apr 2002 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence for abetting murder. |
18 Apr 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused were found guilty and sentenced to imprisonment. |
17 Apr 2002 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was dismissed. |
31 Mar 2002 | Respondent | WonConviction and sentence upheld. |
31 Mar 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction for trafficking in a controlled drug was dismissed. |
26 Mar 2002 | Prosecution | WonAll three accused persons were convicted on the charges. |
26 Mar 2002 | Respondent | LostAppeal allowed. |
18 Mar 2002 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the conviction of Lim Choo Song for importing diamorphine. |
18 Mar 2002 | Respondent | WonSuccessfully defended the appeal against the conviction for importing drugs. |
12 Mar 2002 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
06 Mar 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeals of the second and third appellants were dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
06 Mar 2002 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed against the Public Prosecutor. |
03 Mar 2002 | Respondent | WonThe trial judge's decision to order a subsequent term of imprisonment to commence after the expiration of the appellant’s existing term was affirmed. |
27 Feb 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty of murder. |
24 Feb 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case. |
20 Feb 2002 | Applicant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's application for criminal revision was granted, and the defective charges were amended. |
19 Feb 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
18 Feb 2002 | Applicant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's application for criminal revision was granted, allowing for the amendment of the charges. |
17 Feb 2002 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case as both accused were found guilty. |
17 Feb 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and sentence. |
01 Feb 2002 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction of the appellant. |
31 Jan 2002 | Respondent | WonThe petition for criminal revision was dismissed. |
27 Jan 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, and the sentences were enhanced. |
22 Jan 2002 | Respondent | WonAppeal and petition dismissed; sentence enhanced. |
17 Jan 2002 | Respondent | WonThe petition for criminal revision was dismissed. |
07 Jan 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original judgment. |
06 Jan 2002 | Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction allowed; Rehana Perveen acquitted of the charge. |
06 Jan 2002 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
25 Dec 2001 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused were found guilty of drug trafficking. |
13 Dec 2001 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor proved the offence of causing grievous hurt but failed to prove murder. |
12 Dec 2001 | Appellant, Respondent | Unknown |
12 Dec 2001 | Appellant, Respondent | WonThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the original sentence was varied. |
10 Dec 2001 | Respondent | NeutralNo outcome information provided in the judgment extract. |
06 Dec 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
06 Dec 2001 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; the Public Prosecutor prevailed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
04 Dec 2001 | Prosecution | WonAnthony Ler was found guilty of abetment to murder and sentenced to death. Z was found guilty of murder and sentenced to be detained during the President's pleasure. |
27 Nov 2001 | Prosecution | WonAll three accused persons were found guilty as charged. |
27 Nov 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment and caning. |
19 Nov 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence. |
19 Nov 2001 | Respondent | Unknown |
15 Nov 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to life imprisonment for attempted murder and 6 months imprisonment for criminal breach of trust, to run concurrently. |
15 Nov 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to life imprisonment and 6 months imprisonment. |
11 Nov 2001 | Respondent | Unknown |
11 Nov 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld as the appeal was dismissed and the sentence was enhanced. |
08 Nov 2001 | Respondent | WonThe trial judge's conviction and sentence were upheld. |
07 Nov 2001 | Respondent | WonThe respondent's cross-appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
07 Nov 2001 | Respondent | WonRespondent's cross-appeal against sentence was allowed and the sentence was enhanced to nine months’ imprisonment. |
30 Oct 2001 | Respondent, Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's cross-appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
30 Oct 2001 | Respondent | Neutral |
21 Oct 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced according to the law. |
16 Oct 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed. |
14 Oct 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
10 Oct 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted of trafficking diamorphine. |
09 Oct 2001 | Respondent | NeutralThe court heard the appeal. |
09 Oct 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
03 Oct 2001 | Prosecution | WonBoth accused were convicted and sentenced to death. |
27 Sep 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
20 Sep 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
11 Sep 2001 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was amended to three months’ imprisonment on each charge, to run consecutively, making a total sentence of six months’ imprisonment. The fine imposed by the trial judge was set aside and ordered to be refunded forthwith. |
11 Sep 2001 | Appellant, Respondent | Unknown |
10 Sep 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking was dismissed. |
03 Sep 2001 | Other | NeutralNo outcome information provided in the judgment extract. |
03 Sep 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
03 Sep 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
03 Sep 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
02 Sep 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction and sentence. |
02 Sep 2001 | Respondent | Neutral |
02 Sep 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the drug trafficking conviction. |
27 Aug 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's position was upheld, and the appellant's sentence was enhanced to 12 months' imprisonment and a fine of $10,000 was imposed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
27 Aug 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced to death. |
27 Aug 2001 | Respondent | NeutralNo outcome information provided in the text. |
27 Aug 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
26 Aug 2001 | Respondent | WonThe conviction and sentence of the appellant were affirmed. |
26 Aug 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence and forfeiture was dismissed. |
26 Aug 2001 | Respondent | Other |
26 Aug 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted and sentenced to death. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
23 Aug 2001 | Respondent | WonThe motion to further postpone the applicant's sentence was dismissed. |
06 Aug 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe court found the accused guilty of trafficking in diamorphine. |
05 Aug 2001 | Appellant | LostThe prosecution's appeal against the acquittal was dismissed. |
05 Aug 2001 | Prosecution | Neutral |
02 Aug 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Ramis a/l Muniandy was dismissed. |
22 Jul 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by the appellant was dismissed. |
19 Jul 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
17 Jul 2001 | Respondent, Appellant | LostCross-appeal for sentence enhancement was dismissed. |
15 Jul 2001 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed and sentence enhanced to 48 months imprisonment and a fine of $100,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
05 Jul 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. |
28 Jun 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
28 Jun 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was sentenced to life imprisonment. |
18 Jun 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and sentence imposed by the High Court. |
17 Jun 2001 | Respondent | WonAppeal against conviction dismissed; sentence enhanced. |
04 Jun 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
31 May 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the sentence of eight years' preventive detention was dismissed. |
27 May 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment and caning (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
23 May 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on both charges. |
22 May 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the sentence was increased. |
20 May 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the murder conviction against the appellant's appeal. |
11 May 2001 | Respondent | PartialMurder conviction overturned; appellant convicted of attempted murder (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 May 2001 | Respondent | LostMurder conviction overturned; appellant convicted of a lesser charge. |
08 May 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for drug trafficking. |
08 May 2001 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant was affirmed. |
01 May 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction and sentence. |
29 Apr 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
25 Apr 2001 | Prosecution | PartialThe Public Prosecutor lost the case against the first accused but won the case against the second accused (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
25 Apr 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
22 Apr 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
20 Apr 2001 | Prosecution | PartialConviction of the first and second accused, but acquittal of the third accused. |
15 Apr 2001 | Respondent | PartialAppeal allowed, resulting in a reduced sentence for the appellant. |
08 Apr 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
01 Apr 2001 | Respondent | Won |
30 Mar 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed. |
26 Mar 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Chow Mun Fai's conviction. |
25 Mar 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
18 Mar 2001 | Respondent | PartialThe appeal was partially successful as the sentence was reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
15 Mar 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, and the conviction was affirmed. |
11 Mar 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
07 Mar 2001 | Respondent | LostPetition allowed; conviction reversed and fine of $1,000 to be returned (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
01 Mar 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence. Assumed currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
22 Feb 2001 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
21 Feb 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for harbouring illegal immigrants. |
18 Feb 2001 | Respondent | LostThe appeal was allowed, reversing the conviction. |
07 Feb 2001 | Appellant | WonAppeal by the prosecution was allowed. |
06 Feb 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, and the original sentence was upheld. |
04 Feb 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted on the charge of murder. |
30 Jan 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor's case was upheld; the appeal was dismissed. |
25 Jan 2001 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was allowed, and Chew Suang Heng was sentenced to two months' imprisonment in addition to the fine. |
21 Jan 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
14 Jan 2001 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction. |
11 Jan 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on both charges. |
10 Jan 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted of murder. |
10 Jan 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted and sentenced to death (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
09 Jan 2001 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty on the charges. |
02 Jan 2001 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeals against the convictions. |
22 Dec 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
05 Dec 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 40 years imprisonment. |
30 Nov 2000 | Appellant | LostThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal of Koh Beng Oon was dismissed. |
29 Nov 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe Accused was found guilty on all charges. |
29 Nov 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence of reformative training. |
29 Nov 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the appeal, maintaining the appellant's conviction. |
28 Nov 2000 | Prosecution | WonChow Mun Fai was found guilty of possession of 23.21g of heroin for the purposes of trafficking. |
27 Nov 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 30 years imprisonment. |
27 Nov 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal. |
26 Nov 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused was found guilty and convicted. |
23 Nov 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to 9 years imprisonment. |
22 Nov 2000 | Prosecution, Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against Kuah Kok Choon's acquittal was allowed. |
19 Nov 2000 | Appellant | WonThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the respondents were sentenced to imprisonment for a term of one month and a fine of $2,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
15 Nov 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Suboh's conviction. |
14 Nov 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused was convicted on both charges. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
13 Nov 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted and sentenced to death. |
12 Nov 2000 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; original sentence upheld and enhanced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
05 Nov 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused convicted as charged. |
30 Oct 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld. |
19 Oct 2000 | Prosecution | LostThe Prosecution's case was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and the charges against the accused were dismissed. |
03 Oct 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
01 Oct 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the drug trafficking conviction. |
25 Sep 2000 | Respondent | LostAppeal dismissed and conviction set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
21 Sep 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty and sentenced. |
18 Sep 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Loh Ah Kow was dismissed. |
17 Sep 2000 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant for drug trafficking was upheld. |
06 Sep 2000 | Prosecution | PartialConviction of the second and third accused, but acquittal of the first accused. |
03 Sep 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Yusof bin A Samad was dismissed. |
31 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal by Fong Ser Joo William was dismissed. |
24 Aug 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on all charges. |
23 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld. |
22 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonThe conviction of the appellant for drug trafficking was affirmed. |
20 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed. |
15 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonThe court upheld the forfeiture order of the vehicle used in the commission of an immigration offence. |
14 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the convictions on appeal. |
13 Aug 2000 | Prosecution, Petitioner | WonThe Public Prosecutor's petition for revision was allowed, and the sentence of reformative training was revised to commence on 16 February 2000. |
11 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonThe conviction and sentence of the appellant were affirmed. |
10 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonAppeal dismissed, affirming the original conviction and sentence. No monetary amount was specified. |
03 Aug 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused were found guilty as charged. |
02 Aug 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction. |
31 Jul 2000 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the case was remitted to the District Judge for further inquiry. |
31 Jul 2000 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal against the original sentence was allowed, and the sentence was enhanced. |
23 Jul 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction. |
23 Jul 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused Ong Li Xia and Yeo Kim Han were convicted on all charges. |
16 Jul 2000 | Respondent | WonThe convictions and sentences of both appellants were upheld. |
11 Jul 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the appellant's conviction. |
10 Jul 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was convicted and sentenced to death. |
07 Jul 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed. |
05 Jul 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused sentenced to imprisonment. |
04 Jul 2000 | Respondent | PartialAppeal against convictions upheld; appeals against sentences overturned. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction. |
03 Jul 2000 | Respondent | WonThe High Court enhanced the sentence to 48 months' imprisonment and six strokes of the cane. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
02 Jul 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the murder conviction. |
25 Jun 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed. |
04 Jun 2000 | Prosecution | LostThe accused was acquitted and discharged on all three charges. |
01 Jun 2000 | Appellant | WonThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the respondent was sentenced to preventive detention. |
31 May 2000 | Petitioner | WonThe Public Prosecutor's application for criminal revision was allowed, and the district judge's order was quashed. |
24 May 2000 | Applicant | PartialCriminal Revision No 5/2000 allowed, altering the sentence. |
23 May 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty on the amended charge of trafficking 1,177.28g of cannabis. |
21 May 2000 | Prosecution | Won |
09 May 2000 | Prosecution | PartialConviction of the first accused but acquittal of the second accused. |
03 May 2000 | Prosecution | Unknown |
02 May 2000 | Respondent | WonConviction and sentence upheld. |
26 Apr 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused were sentenced to life imprisonment. |
21 Apr 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty as charged. |
19 Apr 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against Chia Jin Hock. |
18 Apr 2000 | Prosecution | WonAccused found guilty and convicted. |
13 Apr 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against both accused. |
09 Apr 2000 | Respondent | WonCriminal revision allowed; a fine of $1,000 was imposed for each of the six convictions under s 57(1)(e) of the Immigration Act, with one month’s imprisonment in default of each fine. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
31 Mar 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal was dismissed. |
30 Mar 2000 | Respondent | LostAppeal against conviction allowed; sentence of ten weeks' imprisonment set aside. |
27 Mar 2000 | Respondent | WonThe prosecution was awarded costs for both the appeal and the initial court proceedings. |
16 Mar 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the defendant. |
14 Mar 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the applicant's motion for criminal reference. |
13 Mar 2000 | Prosecution | WonAll three accused found guilty as charged. |
10 Mar 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the murder conviction. |
25 Feb 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused. |
11 Feb 2000 | Respondent | WonThe Court of Appeal upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant. |
10 Feb 2000 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the conviction of murder was dismissed. |
07 Feb 2000 | Prosecution | WonThe accused was found guilty as charged. |
16 Jan 2000 | Respondent | PartialAppeal on the first charge dismissed; appeal against conviction on the second charge allowed. |
02 Jan 2000 | Appellant | WonThe prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the respondent was found guilty. |