Public Prosecutor v C: Rape, Attempted Rape, and Outrage of Modesty Case Involving a Minor

In Public Prosecutor v C, the High Court of Singapore heard a case against the accused, C, charged with rape, attempted rape, and outrage of modesty against his 16-year-old daughter. The alleged incidents occurred between 1999 and 2000. The court, presided over by Judicial Commissioner Choo Han Teck, found inconsistencies and unresolved issues in the complainant's evidence, raising reasonable doubt. Consequently, the court discharged and acquitted the accused on all three charges.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Accused discharged and acquitted.

1.3 Case Type

Criminal

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

High Court case involving charges of rape, attempted rape, and outrage of modesty against the accused concerning his daughter. The accused was acquitted due to reasonable doubt.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Public ProsecutorProsecutionGovernment AgencyCharges DismissedLostChristopher Ong, Wong Sook Ping, Sia Aik Kor
CDefendantIndividualAcquittedWon

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Christopher OngAttorney-General's Chambers
Wong Sook PingAttorney-General's Chambers
Sia Aik KorAttorney-General's Chambers

4. Facts

  1. The accused was charged with rape, attempted rape, and outrage of modesty against his daughter.
  2. The complainant alleged the rape occurred in 1999, the attempted rape in February 2000, and the outrage of modesty between September and December 2000.
  3. The complainant told her friend about the rape after the second incident but did not report it to the police until after an unrelated incident.
  4. The accused maintained his innocence throughout the trial.
  5. The complainant identified the Alana Hotel as the location of the outrage of modesty incident.
  6. The accused claimed he had sold the flat where the attempted rape allegedly occurred and no longer had access to it.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Public Prosecutor v C, CC 51/2002, [2002] SGHC 275

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Rape allegedly committed by the accused.
Attempted rape allegedly committed by the accused.
Outraging modesty allegedly committed by the accused.
Complainant molested in a van.
Judgment issued.

7. Legal Issues

  1. Standard of Proof
    • Outcome: The court reiterated that the prosecution must prove the case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
    • Category: Procedural
    • Related Cases:
      • [1998] 2 SLR 42
      • Woolmington v DPP 1935 [AC] 462
  2. Credibility of Witness
    • Outcome: The court found the complainant's evidence to be unsatisfactory due to inconsistencies and lack of explanation for certain omissions.
    • Category: Substantive
    • Related Cases:
      • [1998] 2 SLR 42

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Criminal Prosecution
  2. Imprisonment

9. Cause of Actions

  • Rape
  • Attempted Rape
  • Outrage of Modesty

10. Practice Areas

  • Criminal Litigation

11. Industries

  • No industries specified

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Soh Yang Tick v PPHigh CourtYes[1998] 2 SLR 42SingaporeCited regarding the impact of a victim's failure to promptly file a police report on their credibility in sexual offence cases.
Woolmington v DPPHouse of LordsYesWoolmington v DPP 1935 [AC] 462England and WalesCited for the principle that the prosecution must prove the case against the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Reasonable Doubt
  • Credibility
  • Inconsistencies
  • Corroboration
  • Standard of Proof
  • Disclosure
  • Omission

15.2 Keywords

  • Rape
  • Attempted Rape
  • Outrage of Modesty
  • Singapore
  • High Court
  • Criminal Law
  • Acquittal

16. Subjects

  • Criminal Law
  • Evidence
  • Sexual Offences

17. Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law
  • Sexual Offences
  • Evidence Law