Veria Engineering v Lam Hong Leong Aluminium: Dispute over Erroneous Credit Note and Counter-Claim

In a dispute between Veria Engineering & Development Pte Ltd and Lam Hong Leong Aluminium Pte Ltd, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal concerning a counterclaim awarded to Lam Hong Leong Aluminium. Veria Engineering, the appellant, challenged the trial judge's decision regarding a debit note issued to cancel an allegedly erroneous credit note. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial judge's finding that the debit note was valid and the counterclaim was justified.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Appeal Dismissed

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Veria Engineering sued Lam Hong Leong Aluminium over wrongful deductions. The court ruled in favor of Lam Hong Leong Aluminium on their counterclaim regarding an erroneous credit note.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Veria Engineering & Development Pte LtdAppellantCorporationAppeal DismissedLostChia Ti Lik
Lam Hong Leong Aluminium Pte LtdRespondentCorporationCounterclaim UpheldWonDavid Ong

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Choo Han TeckJudicial CommissionerYes

4. Counsels

Counsel NameOrganization
Chia Ti LikChia Ngee Thuang & Co
David OngDavid Ong & Co

4. Facts

  1. The appellants were the main contractor for the respondents' building and alteration project.
  2. A dispute arose over the architect's certification of work.
  3. The appellants sued the respondents for $138,000, alleging wrongful deduction.
  4. The respondents filed a defence and counterclaim.
  5. The respondents issued a credit note (CN03/0298) and subsequently a debit note (DN 5805A).
  6. The dispute centered on a meeting on 26 August 1998 between Mr. Lim and Miss See.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Veria Engineering & Development Pte Ltd v Lam Hong Leong Aluminium Pte Ltd, DCA 34/2002/D, [2002] SGHC 277

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Meeting between Mr. Lim and Miss See regarding account settlement
Judgment delivered

7. Legal Issues

  1. Validity of Debit Note
    • Outcome: The court found the debit note to be valid, supporting the respondent's counterclaim.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Breach of Contract
    • Outcome: The court implicitly found that the appellant had breached the contract by disputing the debit note.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Breach of Contract

10. Practice Areas

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Construction Disputes

11. Industries

  • Construction

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
No cited cases

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Credit Note
  • Debit Note
  • Counterclaim
  • Certification of Work
  • Settlement
  • Good Faith

15.2 Keywords

  • construction
  • contract
  • dispute
  • credit note
  • debit note
  • counterclaim

16. Subjects

  • Construction Dispute
  • Contract Law
  • Civil Litigation

17. Areas of Law

  • Contract Law
  • Construction Law
  • Civil Procedure