Chia Ti Lik

Chia Ti Lik is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in wills and probate and civil practice. Their track record shows a 29.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 43% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in succession law and wills and probate.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Succession Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Central Provident Fund Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Securities Industry Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recovery of Debt	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Salesmen’s puff	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Certification of Work	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misleading Information	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
CPF Nomination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Chia Ti Lik has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Chia Ti Lik has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chia Ngee Thuang & Co	5 cases	71% of cases	VGI v VGJ: Security for Costs in Probate Proceedings under Family Justice Rules(Feb 2020) Attorney-General v Tan Liang Joo John: Contempt of Court for Scandalizing Judiciary with Kangaroo T-Shirt(Feb 2009) Teo Kim Hui v Kwok Wai Hon: Dispute over Water Seepage and Jurisdiction of Strata Titles Board(Dec 2008)
Chia Ngee Thuang and Co	2 cases	29% of cases	Chai Choon Yong v Central Provident Fund Board: Validity of CPF Nomination & Interpretation of 'Written Law'(Mar 2005) Chai Choon Yong v Central Provident Fund Board: CPF Nomination Validity & Intestate Succession(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chia Ti Lik's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 3 (43%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.7 parties avg	2.7	71%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	29%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chia Ti Lik's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(71%)	71%
Won	2(29%)	29%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	720,062.00	240,020.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VGI v VGJ: Security for Costs in Probate Proceedings under Family Justice Rules 12 Feb 2020 VGI (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	12 Feb 2020	VGI (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; VGI is considered the plaintiff commencing contentious proceedings for the purposes of rule 459 of the Family Justice Rules.
2	Attorney-General v Tan Liang Joo John: Contempt of Court for Scandalizing Judiciary with Kangaroo T-Shirt 17 Feb 2009 Muhammad Shafi’ie Syahmi Bin Sariman (Respondent)Lost	17 Feb 2009	Muhammad Shafi’ie Syahmi Bin Sariman (Respondent): Liable for Contempt of CourtFound liable for contempt of court and sentenced to 7 days in prison.
3	Teo Kim Hui v Kwok Wai Hon: Dispute over Water Seepage and Jurisdiction of Strata Titles Board 10 Dec 2008 Lim Ah Mui alias Lim Teck Seng (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Dec 2008	Lim Ah Mui alias Lim Teck Seng (Plaintiff): Application DismissedOriginating Summons dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Chai Choon Yong v Central Provident Fund Board: Validity of CPF Nomination & Interpretation of 'Written Law' 27 Mar 2005 Lai Weng Kwong (Respondent)Won	27 Mar 2005	Lai Weng Kwong (Respondent): Judgment in favor of respondentThe court found in favor of Lai Weng Kwong, upholding the validity of the nomination.
5	Chai Choon Yong v Central Provident Fund Board: CPF Nomination Validity & Intestate Succession 30 Mar 2004 Lai Weng Kwong (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2004	Lai Weng Kwong (Defendant): WonOriginating summons dismissed with costs to all the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Veria Engineering v Lam Hong Leong Aluminium: Dispute over Erroneous Credit Note and Counter-Claim 21 Nov 2002 Veria Engineering & Development Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	21 Nov 2002	Veria Engineering & Development Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the trial judge's award to the respondents on their counterclaim was dismissed.
7	Ong & Co Pte Ltd v Lai Siew Ping Vivien: Indemnity Clause Validity for Stockbroker's Dealer 28 Nov 2001 Lai Siew Ping Vivien (Defendant)Lost	28 Nov 2001	Lai Siew Ping Vivien (Defendant): Claim DismissedDefendant is liable to indemnify the plaintiff for losses incurred as a result of the trading activities of Mr Xuan Yu, Mr Tay Kong Kiong and Mr New Aik Keong. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.