Fong Yoke San v Chan Lee Pa: Option to Purchase Validity When Not Executed by All Joint Tenants
In Fong Yoke San & Another v Chan Lee Pa, the High Court of Singapore addressed the validity of an option to purchase a property signed by only one of three joint tenants. The plaintiffs, Fong Yoke San and Kwok Sing Cheong, sought a refund of the option fee, arguing the option was incomplete. The court dismissed the claim, holding that the option was binding on the signatory, Chan Lee Pa, who was obligated to procure the other joint tenants' signatures for the sale. The court dismissed the Plaintiffs' claim with costs.
1. Case Overview
1.1 Court
High Court1.2 Outcome
Plaintiffs’ claim was dismissed with costs.
1.3 Case Type
Civil
1.4 Judgment Type
Grounds of Decision
1.5 Jurisdiction
Singapore
1.6 Description
The High Court held that an option to purchase signed by one of three joint tenants was valid, obligating the signatory to complete the sale.
1.7 Decision Date
2. Parties and Outcomes
Party Name | Role | Type | Outcome | Outcome Type | Counsels |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fong Yoke San | Plaintiff | Individual | Claim Dismissed | Lost | Lim Kim Song |
Kwok Sing Cheong | Plaintiff | Individual | Claim Dismissed | Lost | Lim Kim Song |
Chan Lee Pa | Defendant | Individual | Judgment for Defendant | Won | Lee Mong Jen |
3. Judges
Judge Name | Title | Delivered Judgment |
---|---|---|
Woo Bih Li | Judicial Commissioner | Yes |
4. Counsels
Counsel Name | Organization |
---|---|
Lim Kim Song | Song Ling & Partners |
Lee Mong Jen | Leong Chua & Wong |
4. Facts
- The Defendant granted the Plaintiffs an option to purchase a property for $1.15 million.
- The option fee was $11,500, and the expiry date was 4pm on 18 September 2002.
- A title search revealed that there were three joint tenants of the property, including the Defendant.
- The Plaintiffs asserted that the option was incomplete because it was signed by only one of the three joint tenants.
- The Defendant's solicitors stated that the other two owners were willing to sign the option.
- The Plaintiffs did not exercise the option, and the option fee was forfeited.
- The property was eventually sold to another purchaser for $1.11 million.
5. Formal Citations
- Fong Yoke San & Another v Chan Lee Pa, OS No 1358 of 2002, [2002] SGHC 292
6. Timeline
Date | Event |
---|---|
Option to Purchase dated granted by the Defendant to the Plaintiffs | |
Plaintiffs' solicitors asserted the Option was incomplete and demanded the return of the option fee | |
CLP's solicitors replied that the other two owners were willing to sign the Option | |
Expiry time and date for the exercise of the Option | |
Plaintiffs’ claim was dismissed with costs |
7. Legal Issues
- Validity of Option to Purchase
- Outcome: The court held that the option was complete and binding on the signatory, obligating him to complete the sale.
- Category: Substantive
- Sub-Issues:
- Incomplete option
- Unperfected option
- Related Cases:
- [1996] 3 SLR 457
- [1994] 3 SLR 719
8. Remedies Sought
- Repayment of option fee
9. Cause of Actions
- Breach of Contract
10. Practice Areas
- Real Estate Law
- Contract Litigation
11. Industries
- Real Estate
12. Cited Cases
Case Name | Court | Affirmed | Citation | Jurisdiction | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mookka Pillai Rajagopal & Ors v Khushvinder Singh Chopra | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1996] 3 SLR 457 | Singapore | Cited regarding the principle of an incomplete or unperfected option when not signed by all joint tenants. |
Tay Joo Sing v Ku Yu Sang | Court of Appeal | Yes | [1994] 3 SLR 719 | Singapore | Cited regarding the sale of property by one tenant-in-common on behalf of another. |
Malhotra v Choudhury | English Court of Appeal | Yes | [1979] 1 All ER 186 | England and Wales | Cited to support the argument that a person with the benefit of an option can sue on it even if the grantor is not the sole owner of the property. |
13. Applicable Rules
Rule Name |
---|
No applicable rules |
14. Applicable Statutes
Statute Name | Jurisdiction |
---|---|
Civil Law Act (Cap 43) | Singapore |
15. Key Terms and Keywords
15.1 Key Terms
- Option to Purchase
- Joint Tenants
- Option Fee
- Incomplete Option
- Unperfected Option
15.2 Keywords
- Option to Purchase
- Joint Tenants
- Contract Law
- Real Estate
- Singapore High Court
16. Subjects
- Contract Law
- Real Estate
- Options to Purchase
17. Areas of Law
- Contract Law
- Property Law