Lee Mong Jen

Lee Mong Jen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and maintenance. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and maintenance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Design Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Products Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Lee Mong Jen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Lee Mong Jen has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Leong Chua & Wong	3 cases	50% of cases	Fong Yoke San v Chan Lee Pa: Option to Purchase Validity When Not Executed by All Joint Tenants(Dec 2002) Tan Poh Cheng v Kwan Wei Beng: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute(Aug 2000) Gema Metal Ceilings v Iwatani Techno Construction: Breach of Contract & Defective Ceiling System(Mar 2000)
LMJ Law Corporation	2 cases	33% of cases	XGA v XGB: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce(Dec 2024) WDW v WDX: Child Custody, Access, and Maintenance Dispute(Dec 2022)
M J Lee & Associates	1 cases	17% of cases	NK v NL: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife Maintenance, Child Custody & Welfare(Jul 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lee Mong Jen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lee Mong Jen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(17%)	17%
Partial	3(50%)	50%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,812,058.65	468,676.446 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	XGA v XGB: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance in Divorce 04 Dec 2024 XGA (Plaintiff)Partial	04 Dec 2024	XGA (Plaintiff): PartialThe Wife is entitled to S$1,880,446.27 from the division of matrimonial assets. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	WDW v WDX: Child Custody, Access, and Maintenance Dispute 22 Dec 2022 WDX (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	22 Dec 2022	WDX (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe Mother's appeal (DCA 39) was dismissed, upholding the original maintenance contribution ratio.
3	NK v NL: Division of Matrimonial Assets, Wife Maintenance, Child Custody & Welfare 18 Jul 2007 NK (Appellant)Partial	18 Jul 2007	NK (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part in so far as the division of matrimonial assets is concerned. Wife awarded 40% of the matrimonial home and 60% of the other matrimonial assets (which amounts to $931,612.38), as well as 60% of the total value of the companies (if a positive value (overall) results from the valuation ordered at [54] above). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Fong Yoke San v Chan Lee Pa: Option to Purchase Validity When Not Executed by All Joint Tenants 08 Dec 2002 Chan Lee Pa (Defendant)Won	08 Dec 2002	Chan Lee Pa (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; the Plaintiffs' claim was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Tan Poh Cheng v Kwan Wei Beng: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Child Maintenance Dispute 28 Aug 2000 Kwan Wei Beng (Respondent)Won	28 Aug 2000	Kwan Wei Beng (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partHusband's appeal was allowed in part. The court set aside the order directing the parties to surrender the flat to the Housing Development Board. The wife was ordered to transfer her right, title and interest to the flat to the husband upon the husband paying her such sum as was equivalent to 43% of the amount derived by deducting the outstanding loan due on the flat as at the date of transfer from the commercial value of the flat pegged at $480,000. The wife was also ordered to pay a portion of the husband’s costs of appeal fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Gema Metal Ceilings v Iwatani Techno Construction: Breach of Contract & Defective Ceiling System 13 Mar 2000 Gema Metal Ceilings (Far East) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	13 Mar 2000	Gema Metal Ceilings (Far East) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim Dismissed in Part, Claim Allowed in PartClaim for S$143,250 and RM225.20 dismissed. Claim for RM208,636.79 and RM21,251 allowed.