Tang Chiew Ping v Abdul Rashid Bin Razali: Personal Injury Damages Assessment

In Tang Chiew Ping v Abdul Rashid Bin Razali, the High Court of Singapore heard an appeal by Abdul Rashid Bin Razali against the Assistant Registrar's assessment of damages awarded to Tang Chiew Ping for personal injuries sustained in a car accident. Tang Chiew Ping sued Abdul Rashid for damages resulting from a whiplash injury. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Assistant Registrar's award for pre-trial and post-trial loss of earnings.

1. Case Overview

1.1 Court

High Court

1.2 Outcome

Defendant's appeal dismissed.

1.3 Case Type

Civil

1.4 Judgment Type

Grounds of Decision

1.5 Jurisdiction

Singapore

1.6 Description

Assessment of damages for personal injuries. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Assistant Registrar's award for pre-trial and post-trial loss of earnings.

1.7 Decision Date

2. Parties and Outcomes

Party NameRoleTypeOutcomeOutcome TypeCounsels
Tang Chiew PingPlaintiffIndividualAppeal DismissedWon
Abdul Rashid Bin RazaliDefendant, AppellantIndividualAppeal DismissedLost

3. Judges

Judge NameTitleDelivered Judgment
Woo Bih LiJudgeYes

4. Counsels

4. Facts

  1. The plaintiff was injured in a car accident on 30 November 1997.
  2. The defendant was found 85% liable for the accident.
  3. The plaintiff was the Head of the Mathematics Department at St Hilda’s Primary School.
  4. The plaintiff ceased her employment on 28 June 1999 due to her injuries.
  5. The Assistant Registrar awarded the plaintiff $216,021.10 for pre-trial loss of earnings.
  6. The Assistant Registrar awarded the plaintiff $319,250 for post-trial loss of earnings.

5. Formal Citations

  1. Tang Chiew Ping v Abdul Rashid Bin Razali, Suit 951/2000, RA 86/2003, [2003] SGHC 129

6. Timeline

DateEvent
Car accident occurred
Plaintiff stepped down as Head of Department
Plaintiff ceased employment
Assessment of damages commenced
Appeal dismissed

7. Legal Issues

  1. Measure of Damages for Pre-Trial Loss of Earnings
    • Outcome: The court upheld the Assistant Registrar's calculation of pre-trial loss of earnings, which included bonus, performance bonus, and CPF.
    • Category: Substantive
  2. Measure of Damages for Post-Trial Loss of Earnings
    • Outcome: The court upheld the Assistant Registrar's decision to use a loss of future earnings approach rather than a loss of earning capacity approach.
    • Category: Substantive

8. Remedies Sought

  1. Monetary Damages

9. Cause of Actions

  • Negligence

10. Practice Areas

  • Personal Injury Litigation

11. Industries

  • Education

12. Cited Cases

Case NameCourtAffirmedCitationJurisdictionSignificance
Karuppiah Nirmala v Singapore Bus Services LtdHigh CourtYes[2002] 3 SLR 415SingaporeCited regarding the approach to awarding damages for loss of earning capacity versus loss of future earnings.
Chang Ah Lek & Ors v Lim Ah KoonCourt of AppealYes[1999] 1 SLR 82SingaporeCited for the principle that loss of earning capacity is used when a plaintiff can continue in employment without loss of emoluments but would be handicapped if seeking alternative employment.
Fairley v John Thompson (Design and Contracting Division) LtdN/AYes[1973] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 40N/ACited with approval from Chang Ah Lek for the principle that compensation for loss of future earnings is awarded for real assessable loss proved by evidence, while compensation for diminution in earning capacity is awarded as part of general damages.

13. Applicable Rules

Rule Name
No applicable rules

14. Applicable Statutes

Statute NameJurisdiction
No applicable statutes

15. Key Terms and Keywords

15.1 Key Terms

  • Whiplash injury
  • Pre-trial loss of earnings
  • Post-trial loss of earnings
  • Loss of future earnings
  • Loss of earning capacity
  • Multiplicand
  • Multiplier

15.2 Keywords

  • Personal injury
  • Damages
  • Loss of earnings
  • Car accident
  • Singapore

17. Areas of Law

16. Subjects

  • Personal Injury
  • Damages Assessment