B Rao

B Rao is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and measure of damages. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

B Rao has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in personal injury and measure of damages.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Personal Injury	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Whiplash Injury	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Liability insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Product Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceuticals Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Products Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non-contribution clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	B Rao has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

B Rao has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
B. Rao K.S. Rajah	3 cases	60% of cases	De Cruz v Guangzhou: Slim 10, Director Liability & Negligence(Oct 2003) Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay v Teo Eng Chuan: Personal Injury Claim for Whiplash Injury and Loss of Earning Capacity(Apr 2003) Liberty Citystate Insurance v AXA Insurance: Validity of Non-Contribution Clause in Liability Insurance(Mar 2001)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	20% of cases	Ho Yiu v Lim Peng Seng: Road Traffic Accident, Damages Assessment for Loss of Earnings(Feb 2004)
B Rao & K S Rajah	1 cases	20% of cases	Tang Chiew Ping v Abdul Rashid Bin Razali: Personal Injury Damages Assessment(Jun 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of B Rao's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.7 parties avg	3.7	60%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	33.3 parties avg	3.3
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of B Rao's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,691,465.66	563,821.893 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ho Yiu v Lim Peng Seng: Road Traffic Accident, Damages Assessment for Loss of Earnings 11 Feb 2004 Lim Peng Seng (Defendant)Lost	11 Feb 2004	Lim Peng Seng (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; required to pay damages to the Plaintiff for pre-trial medical expenses ($60,411.66), pre-trial transport expenses ($4,575), pain and suffering ($75,000), loss of pre-trial earnings ($252,103), loss of future earnings ($1,103,726), future medical expenses ($183,650), and future transport expenses ($12,000) (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	De Cruz v Guangzhou: Slim 10, Director Liability & Negligence 02 Oct 2003 TV Media Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 Oct 2003	TV Media Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment is given for the plaintiff against the second, third and fourth defendants for the amounts computed above together with costs to be taxed or agreed. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
3	Tang Chiew Ping v Abdul Rashid Bin Razali: Personal Injury Damages Assessment 15 Jun 2003 Tang Chiew Ping (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jun 2003	Tang Chiew Ping (Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the award of damages was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Nirumalan V Kanapathi Pillay v Teo Eng Chuan: Personal Injury Claim for Whiplash Injury and Loss of Earning Capacity 20 Apr 2003 Teo Eng Chuan (Defendant, Respondent)Partial	20 Apr 2003	Teo Eng Chuan (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful; the original assessment of damages was largely upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Liberty Citystate Insurance v AXA Insurance: Validity of Non-Contribution Clause in Liability Insurance 07 Mar 2001 AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	07 Mar 2001	AXA Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd (Respondent): Decision set asideDecision of the Commissioner set aside; AXA to pay the compensation awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).